| Rep. Smith Releases Revised Version of SOPA 
to Be Marked Up on December 15 | 
               
              
                | 
 12/12. Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX), the sponsor of 
HR 3261 [LOC | 
WW], the 
"Stop Online Piracy Act" or "SOPA", released a revised version of his 
bill on Monday, December 12, 2011. See,
amendment 
in the nature of a substitute [71 pages in PDF]. 
The House Judiciary Committee (HJC), which he 
chairs, is scheduled to mark up this bill on Thursday, December 15, 2011, at 10:00 AM. 
This bill is the only item on the
agenda. 
Rep. Smith also released a
summary of this amendment. 
The related bill in the Senate is S 968 
[LOC | 
WW], the "Preventing 
Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011" 
or "PROTECT IP Act". The Senate Judiciary 
Committee (SJC) amended and approved this bill on May 26, 2011. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Rep. Issa and Others Propose USITC Based 
Approach to Web Sites Dedicated to Infringing Activity | 
               
              
                | 
 12/14. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA),
Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA),
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), and others have 
announced, but not yet introduced, a competing bill to be titled "Online 
Protection & Enforcement of Digital Trade Act". This title provides a near 
acronym -- "OPEN Act". See, 
draft [18 pages in PDF]. 
Their
summary of the draft states that their proposal would give new authority to the
U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) to deal with 
rogue foreign web sites. 
The summary states that the USITC is already "an arbiter of 
whether imports violate U.S. intellectual property rights and should or should 
not be allowed into the U.S. Under current law, rightsholders can petition the 
ITC to investigate whether certain imports violate U.S. trademarks and 
copyrights. The ITC is authorized to not only investigate these issues but to 
initiate actions to prevent the imports in question from entering into the U.S." 
It elaborates that "Under our proposal, the ITC would be 
authorized to initiate an investigation at a rightsholder's request and issue a 
cease-and-desist order against foreign websites that provide illegal digital 
imports and/ or facilitate the importation of counterfeit goods. In order to 
issue such an order, the ITC would need to find that the foreign website is 
``primarily´´ and ``willfully´´ engaging in infringement of U.S. copyrights or 
willfully enabling imports of counterfeit merchandise. This standard comports 
with existing copyright and trademark law. An ITC cease-and-desist order would, 
under this proposal, compel financial transaction providers and Internet 
advertising services to cease providing financial and advertising services to 
the foreign website." 
It also states that "respondents would have a right to be heard", but that 
the USITC could issue emergency ex parte orders. 
It also proposes "immunity for those entities that are complying 
with the ITC orders, including financial transaction providers and Internet 
advertising services that voluntarily refuse to provide services to foreign 
websites that endanger public health by supplying illicit prescription 
drugs." 
The draft bill provides that "It shall be unlawful to operate or maintain an 
Internet site dedicated to infringing activity." 
Then, if the USITC "determines ... that an Internet site 
dedicated to infringing activity is operated or maintained in violation" of this 
prohibition, the USITC may "issue an order to cease and desist the infringing 
activity of the Internet site against the Internet site and to the owner and the 
operator of the Internet site". 
The draft also provides that a "financial transaction provider 
shall take reasonable measures, as expeditiously as reasonable, designed to 
prevent or prohibit the completion of payment transactions by the provider that 
involve customers located in the United States and the Internet site associated 
with the domain name subject to the order ..." 
Also, "an Internet advertising service shall, as expeditiously 
as reasonable, take technically feasible measures intended to cease serving 
advertisements to the domain name subject to the order ... in situations in 
which the service would directly share revenues generated by the advertisements 
with the operator of the Internet site associated with that domain name." 
The draft contains numerous immunity provisions for 
intermediaries. For example, "No cause of action shall lie in any court against 
a financial transaction provider or an Internet advertising service on which a 
copy of an order is served ... or against any director, officer, employee, or 
agent thereof, other than in an action ... for‚ (i) any act reasonably designed 
to comply with this subsection or reasonably arising from the order; or (ii) any 
act, failure, or inability to meet the obligations under this subsection of the 
provider or service if the provider or service, as the case may be, makes a good 
faith effort to comply with such obligations." 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Critics and Proponents Dispute Merits of 
SOPA | 
               
              
                | 
 12/14. Proponents and critics of the SOPA have been waging intensified 
lobbying and advertising campaigns in the run up to mark up of HR 3261 
[LOC | 
WW], the 
"Stop Online Piracy Act" or "SOPA" 
A large group of individuals, who describe themselves as the people who 
"designed the Internet the first time", sent a
letter to members of Congress on December 15 opposing the SOPA. The group 
includes Vint Cerf, 
who has worked for Google since 2005. 
The letter states that "If enacted, either of these bills will create an 
environment of tremendous fear and uncertainty for technological innovation, and 
seriously harm the credibility of the United States in its role as a steward of 
key Internet infrastructure. Regardless of recent amendments to SOPA, both bills 
will risk fragmenting the Internet's global domain name system (DNS) and have 
other capricious technical consequences. In exchange for this, such legislation 
would engender censorship that will simultaneously be circumvented by deliberate 
infringers while hampering innocent parties' right and ability to communicate 
and express themselves online." 
The Tech Freedom (TF), Competitive Enterprise 
Institute (CEI), Americans for Job Security (AJS), and Americans for Limited Government (ALG) 
sent a letter 
on December 14 to Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) and 
Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) in which they wrote that 
"While we applaud the manager's amendment proposed by Chairman Smith, there simply has not 
been time to properly evaluate its real-world consequences. Although the proposed changes would 
indeed improve the bill, they leave several legitimate objections unaddressed." 
They wrote that there is a "massive grassroots campaign" against "Internet 
censorship", and "profound public skepticism". Hence, "If SOPA is ultimately 
enacted, any public perception that Congress failed to carefully balance the 
competing interests of copyright enforcement, free speech, due process, and 
Internet freedom will further erode public support not only for Congress, but 
also for copyright itself. The erosion of public respect for copyright is a 
primary factor behind the dramatic increase in infringement in recent years." 
They urged the HJC to postpone the mark up, hold additional hearings, and 
allow sufficient time for preparation of proposed amendments. 
The Internet Society (IS) announced on 
December 12 that its Board of Trustees "has expressed concern with a number of 
U.S. legislative proposals that would mandate DNS blocking and filtering by ISPs 
to protect the interests of copyright holders." 
The IS wrote in a release 
that it is "concerned with provisions in both bills regarding Domain Name System 
(DNS) filtering. DNS filtering is often proposed as a way to block illegal 
content consumption by end users. Yet policies to mandate DNS filtering will be 
ineffective for that purpose and will interfere with cross-border data flows and 
services undermining innovation and social development across the globe." 
The IS continued that "Filtering DNS or blocking domain names does not remove the illegal 
content -- it simply makes the content harder to find. Those who are determined to 
download filtered content can easily use a number of widely available, 
legitimately-purposed tools to circumvent DNS filtering regimes. As a result, 
DNS filtering encourages the creation of alternative, non-standard DNS systems." 
"From a security perspective, DNS filtering is incompatible with an important 
security technology called DNSSEC.  In fact, DNSSEC would be weakened by these 
proposals. This means that the DNS filtering proposals in SOPA and PIPA could 
ultimately reduce global Internet security, introduce new vulnerabilities, and 
put individual users at risk." 
"Most worrisome", the IS concluded, "DNS filtering and blocking raises human 
rights and freedom of expression concerns, and often curtails international principles of rule of 
law and due process. Some countries have used DNS filtering and blocking as a 
way to restrict access to the global Internet and to curb free expression." 
The Computer & Communications Industry 
Association (CCIA) stated in a
release 
on December 14 that "All who value the economic and political freedom of the 
Internet need to join in opposing the overly broad Internet censorship and 
regulatory regime, which SOPA and PIPA would create. The fact that some in the 
House Judiciary Committee are so dismissive of the concerns of so many diverse 
stakeholders from cybersecurity experts and venture capitalists to human rights 
groups and tech industry leaders is perplexing." 
Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google, spoke at an event in Washington 
DC on December 12. The moderator of the program asked him why he opposes this 
bill. He responded, "mostly because it criminalizes the intermediaries".  
He stated that it provides that "we are going to criminalize the linking and structure of 
the internet itself". He said that this is "censorship of the internet links". 
Moreover, governments will also use this to censor speech. And, as a result, 
"the internet is going to get balkanized". See,
video of event. 
Rep. Smith responded to some of his critics, including Google. He wrote in a 
December 14
release that "It's disappointing that some critics of the Stop Online Piracy 
Act do not understand what the bill actually does. The manager's amendment 
introduced earlier this week narrows the scope of the bill to ensure that it 
only applies to foreign rogue websites. The bill defines rogue sites as foreign 
websites primarily dedicated to the sale and distribution of illegal or 
infringing material or foreign websites that market themselves as websites 
primarily dedicated to illegal or infringing activity. Lawful companies and 
websites like Google, Twitter, Yahoo and Facebook have nothing to worry about 
under this bill." 
He continued that "Unfortunately, that has not stopped some of the bill's 
critics from spreading lies about the legislation in an attempt to stall efforts 
by Congress to combat foreign rogue websites. Companies like Google have made 
billions by working with and promoting foreign rogue websites so they have a 
vested interest in preventing Congress from stopping rogue sites." 
Rep. Smith also raised the subject of Google's own illegal activities. "In 
August, Google paid half a billion dollars to settle a criminal case because of 
the search engine giant's active promotion of foreign rogue pharmacies that sold 
counterfeit and illegal drugs to U.S. patients. Their opposition to this 
legislation is self-serving since they profit from doing business with rogue 
sites that steal and sell America's intellectual property." 
See also, story 
titled "Google to Pay $500 Million for Allowing Its AdWords Program to be Used 
to Promote Illegal Online Drug Sales" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail 
Alert No. 2,292, August 24, 2011. 
Michael O'Leary of the Motion Picture 
Association of America (MPAA), stated in a
release that "Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt 
again engaged in sky is falling rhetoric in attacking important legislation that 
targets criminals who profit from online piracy and counterfeiting." 
O'Leary wrote that "Schmidt's comment that the legislation ``criminalizes the 
intermediaries´´ is a new weapon in their arsenal of hyperbole. 
There is broad recognition that all companies in the Internet ecosystem have a 
serious responsibility to target criminal activity. This type of rhetoric only 
serves as a distraction and I hope it is not a delaying tactic." 
Chris Dodd, head of the MPAA, gave a
speech in Washington DC on December 13 in which he stated that "Hollywood 
is pro-Internet. We stand with those who strongly oppose foreign governments 
that would unilaterally block websites, and thus deny the free flow of 
information and speech. So I want to make it clear right at the outset that our 
fight against content theft is not a fight against technology. It is a fight 
against criminals. Nor is it a fight to protect a stagnant and outmoded business 
model. Indeed, it is fundamentally a fight to protect jobs." 
Former Senator Dodd continued that "Contrary to piracy apologists, the operators of 
these fraudulent sites aren't overzealous film buffs or political activists making a statement 
about freedom of information. They are criminals, plain and simple: they don't innovate, they 
don’t adhere to manufacturing standards, and they certainly don't pay taxes on 
the proceeds from their scams. They dupe honest consumers into accepting stolen 
-- and in many cases counterfeit and dangerous -- goods." 
"Therefore", Dodd concluded, "I find absolutely reprehensible the comparisons 
some have made between efforts to shut down foreign rogue sites and the policies of repressive 
governments. We have not proposed, nor would we ever support, any efforts to 
block political websites, censor social media, or silence artists because of 
what they want to say. It's an outrageous false comparison." 
A large collection of movie, record, book publishing and other 
content companies, as well as related unions, stated in an
ad run in New York based newspapers that "illegal foreign websites are 
destroying American jobs and causing billions in lost revenue. They threaten the 
jobs of some of the best-known creative talent in the world, many of whom belong 
to New York guilds and unions. And they threaten the jobs of hundreds of 
thousands of musicians, songwriters, artists and professionals in entertainment 
companies, worldwide sports organizations and telecasters -- in New York and 
across America. That's why we all strongly urge you to protect the jobs and intellectual 
property of American citizens by supporting" the SOPA and PROTECT IP Act. 
Maria Pallante, the Register 
of Copyright, stated at an event in Washington DC on December 12 that passage of this legislation 
is one of the two top priorities of the Copyright Office. 
The other is passage of orphan works legislation. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | In This 
                Issue | 
               
              
                This issue contains the following items: 
 • Rep. Smith Releases Revised Version of SOPA to Be Marked Up on December 15 
 • Rep. Issa and Others Propose USITC Based 
Approach to Web Sites Dedicated to Infringing Activity 
 • Critics and Proponents Dispute Merits of SOPA
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                Washington Tech 
                Calendar 
                New items are highlighted in 
                red. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Monday, December 12 | 
               
              
                | 
                 The House will meet at 12:00 NOON for morning hour, and at 2:00 PM 
  for legislative business. The House will consider numerous non-technology related items under 
  suspension of the rules. Votes will be postponed until 6:30 PM. See, Rep. Cantor's 
  schedule for the week. 
                11:00 AM - 1:00 PM. The Copyright Clearance 
  Center (CCC) will host a panel discussion titled "Copyright & Commerce: Orphan 
  Works and Fair Use in a Digital Age". The speakers will be
  Maria Pallante (Register of 
  Copyright), Victor Perlman (American Society of Media Photographers), 
  and Cecilia Kang (Washington Post). This is an invitation only event. For more information, 
  contact Craig Sender at csender at copyright dot com or  978-646-2502. See,
  
  notice. Location: Newseum, 555 Pennsylvania Ave., NW. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Tuesday, December 13 | 
               
              
                | 
                 The House will meet at 10:00 AM for morning hour, and at 
  12:00 NOON for legislative business. See, Rep. Cantor's
  schedule for the week. 
                10:30 AM. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will hold an event 
  titled "open meeting". Location: FCC, Commission Meeting Room, 445 12th St., SW. 
                1:00 - 2:30 PM. The Information 
  Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) will host an panel discussion titled 
  "Benefits and Limitations of Self-Regulation for Online Behavioral 
  Advertising". The speakers 
  will be Daniel Castro (ITIF), 
  Fernando LaGuarda (Time Warner Cable), and Morgan Reed (Association for 
  Competitive Technology). See,
  notice. Location: 
  Microsoft, 11th floor, 901 K St.,  NW. 
                2:30 PM. The Senate Intelligence 
  Committee (SIC) will hold a closed meeting. See,
  
  notice. Location: Room 219, Hart Building. 
                6:00 - 8:15 PM. The Federal Communications 
  Bar Association (FCBA) will host an event titled "Litigating Appeals in the 
  D.C. Circuit". Prices vary. CLE credits. Registrations and cancellations 
  are due by 12:00 NOON on December 12. See,
  registration form. 
  Location: Dow Lohnes, 1200 New Hampshire Ave., NW. 
                6:00 - 9:15 PM. The DC Bar Association 
  will host an event titled "IP Year In Review Series 2011:The New Patent Law and 
  More". The speakers will be Bradley Wright (Banner & Witcoff) and Eric Wright 
  (Stites & Harbison). See,
  
  notice. The price to attend ranges from $89 to $129. CLE credits. For more 
  information, call 202-626-3488. Location: DC Bar Conference Center, 1101 K St., NW. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Wednesday, December 14 | 
               
              
                | 
                 The House will meet at 10:00 AM for morning hour, and at 
  12:00 NOON for legislative business. See, Rep. Cantor's
  schedule for the   week. 
                9:00 AM. The House Commerce Committee's (HCC) Subcommittee on 
  Communications and Technology will hold a hearing titled "ICANN’s 
  Top-Level Domain Name Program". The witnesses will be Fiona Alexander 
  (NTIA), 
  Joshua Bourne (Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse), Thomas Embrescia (Employ 
  Media), Anjali Hansen (Council of Better Business Bureaus), Daniel Jaffe 
  (Association of National Advertisers), and Kurt Pritz (ICANN). 
  See,
  
  notice. Location: Room 2123, Rayburn Building. 
                9:30 - 11:30 AM. The Senate Banking 
  Committee's (SBC) Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance, and Investment will hold a 
  hearing titled "Examining Investor Risks in Capital Raising". See,
  
  notice. Location: Room 538, Dirksen Building. 
                10:00 AM. The House Ways and 
  Means Committee (HWMC) will hold a hearing on the status of negotiations 
  for a Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). See,
  notice. 
  Location: Room 1101, Longworth Building. 
                10:00 AM. The Senate Commerce 
  Committee (SCC) will meet to mark up numerous bills, including S 1953 
  [LOC | 
  WW], the 
  "Research and Innovative Technology Administration Reauthorization Act of 2011". See,
  
  notice. Location: Room 253, Russell Building. 
                10:00 AM. The Senate Judiciary 
  Committee (SJC) will hold a hearing titled "Oversight of the Federal Bureau of 
  Investigation". The only witness will be Robert Mueller (FBI Director). See,
  
  notice. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Thursday, December 15 | 
               
              
                | 
                 The House will meet at 10:00 AM for morning hour, and at 
  12:00 NOON for legislative business. See, Rep. Cantor's
  schedule for the week. 
                The Senate will meet at 9:30 AM. It will consider the 
                nomination of Morgan Kristen to be a Judge of the
                U.S. Court of Appeals 
                (9thCir). 
                9:00 -10:30 AM. The American Enterprise 
  Institute (AEI) will host a panel discussion by proponents of giving green cards to 
  foreign students who graduate from U.S. universities with advanced degrees in STEM fields. 
  The speakers will be Rep. Tim Griffin (R-AR), Madeline 
  Zavodny (Agnes Scott College), and Sudhakar Shenoy (IMC). See,
  
  notice. For more information, contact Matt McKillip at matthew dot mckillip at aei dot 
  org or 202-862-7197. Location: AEI, 12th floor, 1150 17th St., NW. 
                9:30 AM - 5:00 PM. The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) 
  North American Numbering Council 
  will meet. Location: FCC, Commission Meeting Room (Room TW-C305), 445 12th St., SW. 
                9:30 AM. The House Financial 
  Services Committee's (HFSC) Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government 
  Sponsored Enterprises will hold a hearing on HR 3606, the “Reopening American 
  Capital Markets to Emerging Growth Companies Act of 2011". See,
  
  notice. Location: Room HVC-210, Capitol Visitor Center. 
                10:00 AM. The House Judiciary 
  Committee (HJC) will meet to mark up HR 3261 
  [LOC | 
  WW], the 
  "Stop Online Piracy Act". See,
  notice. See also,
  
  amendment in the nature of a substitute [71 pages in PDF] to be offered by 
  Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX). Location: Room 2141, Rayburn Building. 
                10:00 AM. The Senate Judiciary 
  Committee (SJC) will hold an executive business meeting. The agenda 
  includes consideration of no technology related bills. The agenda includes 
  consideration of the nomination of Brian Wimes to be a Judge of the U.S. 
  District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri. See,
  
  notice. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Friday, December 16 | 
               
              
                | 
                 The House may meet at 9:00 AM for legislative business. See, Rep. Cantor's
  schedule for the week. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Monday, December 19 | 
               
              
                | 
                 No events listed. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law 
                Journal | 
               
                | 
      Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and a subscription e-mail alert. 
     The basic rate for a subscription to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year for 
     a single recipient. There are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. 
                                    
     Free one month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free subscriptions are 
     available for  federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and 
     executive branch. The TLJ web site is free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily 
     E-Mail Alert are not published in the web site until two months after writing. 
                                    
     For information about subscriptions, see 
     
     subscription information page. 
            
     Tech Law Journal now accepts credit card payments. See, TLJ
     credit 
     card payments page. 
            
     
     
     
      
     TLJ is published by
     David 
     Carney 
     Contact: 202-364-8882. 
     carney at techlawjournal dot com 
     3034 Newark St. NW, Washington DC, 20008. 
     
     Privacy
     Policy 
     Notices
     & Disclaimers 
     Copyright 1998-2011 David Carney. All rights reserved. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     |