|UK Clears Ticketmaster Live Nation
12/22. The United Kingdom
Competition Commission (UKCC) approved the proposed merger of
Ticketmaster and Live Nation. See,
UKCC stated in a
release that it "concluded that the merger will not result in a substantial
lessening of competition in the market for live music ticket retailing or in any other
market in the UK, including live music promotion and live music venues".
Much of the UKCC's analysis focused on the likely impact of this transaction
on Eventim. The UKCC wrote in its
Final Report [85 pages in PDF], also released on December 22, 2009, that the
three relevant markets are ticketing, promotion, and venues.
Ticketmaster stated in a
release that "Clearance of the
proposed merger in the UK follows regulatory approval in Norway and Turkey.
Separate regulatory reviews are continuing in the United States and Canada,
where the parties remain optimistic there will be a successful outcome."
The two companies announced their proposed merger in February of
2009. The Department of Justice's (DOJ)
Antitrust Division is still sitting on this transaction.
Rep. Bill Pascrell (D-NJ) stated in a
release that he is "disappointed" by the UKCC's decision. He added that
"While in the United Kingdom they only control about 50 percent of the market,
the two companies combined control between 70 to 80 percent of the market here
in the United States."
Several interest groups in the U.S. have joined in opposing this transaction,
including the National Association of Ticket Brokers
(NATB), American Antitrust Institute
(AAI), Consumer Federation of America (CFA), and U.S. Public Interest Research Group
(USPIRG). See, AAI
On December 16, 2009, Rep. Pascrell, Rep. Joe
Courtney (D-IL), Rep. Michael Capuano
(D-MA), Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN),
Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT) and others held a news
conference at which they argued that the DOJ should block the merger. See, Rep. Courtney's
Also, Rep. Pascrell, Rep. Courtney and 48 other Representatives sent a
letter [PDF] to Christine Varney, head of the DOJ's Antitrust Division, on July
27, 2009. They wrote then that "Ticketmaster Entertainment is the industry's
overwhelmingly dominant ticket seller, its largest provider of talent management
services, and its second largest reseller of tickets. Live Nation is the
industry's largest promoter of live entertainment events, the second largest
ticket seller, and the second largest owner/manager of entertainment venues. The
transaction therefore would create an entity, Live Nation Entertainment, which
would enjoy a virtual stranglehold over the live entertainment industry."
They added that the merger would "exacerbate the already significant barriers
to entering the ticket sales market".
The Representatives also wrote that "the proposed merger would create a
vertically integrated entity whose power would extend across five of the
industry's six main markets. An entrant or competitor in any of these markets
would face the merged firm not only as a market rival, but also as a power in
other critically related markets. A new promoter, for example, needs artists
willing to perform and venues appropriate for staging the event. A new venue
needs artists and promoters willing to book the facility. The vertically
integrated firm can withhold these critical inputs, and its rival will suffer.
To avoid such problems, an entrant would need to enter the industry on several
levels at once, a burden that makes entry far more daunting and costly. The
combined entity could therefore use its five-market vertical integration to
restrain trade both by chilling entry and disciplining rivals."
Rep. Pascrell and others introduced HR 2669
the "Better Oversight of Secondary Sales and Accountability in Concert Ticketing
Act of 2009", or "BOSS ACT", on June 2, 2009.
This bill would require that the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) write rules that regulate the sales, distribution and pricing
of tickets. The bill would require one set of rules for primary sales, distribution
and pricing, and a second set of rules for the secondary market.
This bill would reach not only live music concert tickets, but also, any
"ticket of admission to a sporting event, theater, musical performance, or place
of public amusement of any kind".
The bill would also require the registration of both "secondary ticket
seller" and "online ticket marketplace. The bill defines "online resale
marketplace" as "an Internet website -- (A) that facilitates or enables the
resale of tickets by secondary ticket sellers; or (B) on which secondary ticket
sellers offer tickets for resale".
This bill would give enforcement authority to the FTC and states. It would
not preempt any state laws, except those inconsistent with this bill and
regulations promulgated thereunder.
|FCC Reports on ILEC Quality of Service
12/24. The Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Wireline Competition
Bureau's (WCB) Industry Analysis and Technology
Division (IATD) released a
[43 pages in PDF] titled "Quality of Service of Incumbent Local
This report finds that for several indicators quality of
service (QOS) is deteriorating, and that among the large carriers, Verizon far
and away receives the highest number of complaints per million lines. See also,
This report states that the FCC does not impose
service quality standards on communications common carriers, but that it
"monitors quality of service data submitted by incumbent local exchange carriers
that are regulated as price-cap carriers" and "summarizes these data and
publishes a report on quality of service trends annually".
The FCC monitors eight QOS categories: "average
complaints per million lines, percent of installation commitments met, lengths
of installation intervals, lengths of repair intervals, percentage of switches
with outages, trouble report rate per thousand access lines, percentage
dissatisfied with installation, and percentage dissatisfied with repair".
The report concludes that "our analysis, which
incorporated service quality data from the most recent six years, identified the
presence of statistically significant long-term upward or downward trends in
some of the indicators".
The report finds that there is growth trend for
the categories of repair intervals, percent residential installation
dissatisfaction, and percent residential repair dissatisfaction.
For the year 2008 the report states that the
complaints per millions lines for large carriers was highest by far for Verizon,
followed by AT&T, Qwest, and Embarq (formerly Sprint).
Although, two small carriers (Century Tel. and Citizens) had higher complaint
rates. Also, for AT&T, the former BellSouth territory accounted for the highest
level of complaints. The average for large carriers is 147.7 complaints per million
access lines. (See, Chart 1A at page 14.)
|This issue contains the following items:
• UK Clears Ticketmaster Live Nation Merger
• FCC Reports on ILEC Quality of Service Trends
• FCC's Clyburn Troubled With Verizon Wireless's
Statements Regarding Early Termination Fees
New items are highlighted in
|Monday, December 28
The House will not meet the week of December 28 through
January 1. See, Rep. Hoyer's
release. See also, Section 11 of
The Senate will not meet. It will next meet on January 5, 2010, at 12:00
NOON in pro forma session.
Deadline to submit applications to Google for "Google Policy
Fellowships" for the summer of 2010 at various public policy groups. See,
Google notice, and
story titled "Google to Fund Summer Internships at Tech Policy Groups"
in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 2,014, November 12, 2009.
No events listed.
No events listed.
|Friday, January 1
New Year's Day. This is a federal holiday. See, Office of
Personnel Management's (OPM)
page titled "2010 Federal Holidays".
Deadline to submit comments to the Department of Justice's
(DOJ) Antitrust Division regarding the
proposed final judgment,
and Competitive Impact Statement in U.S. v. AT&T. See,
notice in the Federal
Register, November 3, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 211, at Pages 56869-56881. In this proceeding,
the DOJ approved the merger of AT&T and Centennial Communications, subject to
divestitures in eight local markets. See, story titled "DOJ Approves AT&T
Acquisition of Centennial" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
2,004, October 16, 2009. The Federal Register notice does not specify the comment
deadline. Rather, it states that comments are due "within 60 days of the date
of this notice".
|Monday, January 4
The House will not meet the week of January 4-8. See, Rep. Hoyer's
release. See also, Section 11 of
Deadline to submit proposals to be designated database
administrator in the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) white space
Notice [4 pages in PDF]. It is DA 09-2479 in ET Docket No. 04-186. See also,
story titled "FCC Requests Proposals to Be Designated White Spaces Database
Administrator" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 2,018, November 30, 2009.
|FCC's Clyburn Troubled With Verizon
Wireless's Statements Regarding Early Termination Fees
12/23. On December 18, 2009, Verizon Wireless (VW) sent a
13 page letter with attachments [77 pages in PDF] to the Federal
Communications Commission's (FCC)
Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB)
regarding its charging of early termination fees (ETF) to its wireless
VW asserted that its "contracts with ETFs promote consumer choice and
VW wrote that "This pricing structure
enables Verizon Wireless to offer wireless devices at a substantial discount
from their full retail price. By reducing up-front costs to consumers, this
pricing lowers the barriers to consumers to obtaining mobile broadband devices.
It thus enables many more consumers, including those of more limited means,
access to a range of exciting, state-of-the art broadband services and
capabilities. The company's pricing structure therefore promotes the national
goal of fostering the greater adoption and use of mobile broadband services."
FCC Commissioner Mignon
Clyburn stated in a
on December 23, 2009, this VW's statements in this letter are "are unsatisfying
and, in some cases, troubling. In particular, I am concerned about what appears to
be a shifting and tenuous rationale for ETFs."
(at right) continued that "No longer is the claim that ETFs are tied solely
to the true cost of the wireless device; rather, they are now also used to foot
the bill for `advertising costs, commissions for sales personnel, and store costs.´
Consumers already pay high monthly fees for voice and data designed to cover the
costs of doing business. So when they are assessed excessive penalties, especially
when they are near the end of their contract term, it is hard for me to believe that
the public interest is being well served."
Moreover, "I am also alarmed by the fact that many consumers have been
charged phantom fees for inadvertently pressing a key on their phones thereby launching
Verizon Wireless's mobile Internet service. The company asserted in its response to the
Bureau that it `does not charge users when the browser is launched,´ but recent press reports
and consumer complaints strongly suggest otherwise."
She concluded that "These issues cannot be ignored" and "I look forward to
exploring this issue in greater depth with my colleagues in the New Year."
|About Tech Law
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
a subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year for a single
recipient. There are discounts for subscribers with multiple
Free one month trial subscriptions are available. Also,
free subscriptions are available for journalists, federal
elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is free access. However,
copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not published in the
web site until two months after writing.
For information about subscriptions, see
subscription information page.
Tech Law Journal now accepts credit card payments. See, TLJ
card payments page.
TLJ is published by
carney at techlawjournal dot com
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Copyright 1998-2009 David Carney. All rights reserved.