|DOJ Fines Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo
$31.5 Million for Advertising of Internet Gambling
12/19. The Department of Justice's (DOJ) Office of the U.S. Attorney for the
Eastern District of Missouri released a
settlement agreement [7 pages in PDF] with Microsoft that provides for
payments by Microsoft totaling $21 Million in return for settlement of
government claims that Microsoft violated laws related to internet gambling.
The agreement states that this results "from the conduct of Microsoft
Corporation involving its' alleged acceptance, processing and use of payments
received for advertising on-line gambling activities in the United States from,
or attributable to, on-line gambling businesses operating in violation of state
or federal law."
The agreement further states that the government alleged that Microsoft
"received payments from, or attributable to, on-line gambling businesses for
advertising in the United States on-line gambling activities, ... the
transmission and receipt of which funds the business operators knew, or should
have known, were derived from criminal offenses, or funds intended to be used to
promote or support unlawful activity, including violations of the Federal Wire
Wager Act, of federal wagering excise tax laws, and of various states' statutes
and municipal laws prohibiting gambling, either outright or absent regulation,
licensing and/or taxation by the particular states and municipalities."
Under this agreement, Microsoft agrees to pay penalties, cooperate with the government in
its ongoing investigations and prosecutions (including providing retained electronic data),
and refrain from making any public statements refuting any part of the agreement. The
government agrees not to bring any criminal or civil action against Microsoft under federal
Microsoft admits no wrongdoing in this agreement.
This agreement does not settle any state or local claims or allegations.
The DOJ released a similar
settlement agreement [6 page in PDF] with Google, and another similar
settlement agreement [7 pages in PDF] with Yahoo and related companies.
Microsoft's fine is $21 Million, payable as follows: $4.5 Million to the
U.S., $7.5 Million to the International Center
for Missing and Exploited Children (ICMEC), and $9 Million for internet
advertising of the illegality of online gambling enterprises.
Google's fine is $3 Million.
Yahoo's fine is $7.5 Million, payable as follows: $3 Million to the
U.S., and $4.5 Million for internet anti-gambling advertising.
These actions involve several government agencies, including the DOJ, its
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
The DOJ's accompanying release reflects a variety of governmental goals. These
include protection of onshore gambling operations from competition form offshore
gambling operations, and maximization of tax revenues.
Catherine Hanaway, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri,
stated in this release “Honest taxpayers and gambling industry personnel who do
follow the law suffer from those who promote illegal online behavior."
The IRS's James Vickery stated that "Illegal internet gaming operations
continue to be areas of IRS compliance concern", and that it "will continue to
play an enforcement role in the illegal gaming industry and to support
regulatory and legislative initiatives aimed at eliminating an environment
conducive to illegal gambling."
|WTO Allows Offshore Nation not to Enforce
US IPR as Damages for US Protection of Onshore Internet Gambling
12/21. The World Trade Organization (WTO) released a
[PDF] in the case brought by the tiny Caribbean nation of Antigua and Barbados (A&B).
A&B asserts, and the WTO has held, that U.S. laws related to internet gambling violate
U.S. trade treaty obligations by protecting onshore internet gambling, while outlawing the
provision of similar gambling services online by providers in A&B. This report allows
A&B to collect $21 Million per year from the U.S. in the form of non-protection of U.S.
intellectual property rights (IPR).
Previously, in this long running WTO proceeding, the WTO found that the U.S. has violated
its treaty obligations on the grounds that U.S. law carves out an domestic exception
for internet gambling on horse racing.
This report summarizes past proceedings, and provides a ruling on remedies. It provides
that A&B may collect damages of $21 Million per year from the U.S. by suspending their own
treaty obligations, under the
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) [33 pages in
PDF], to protect U.S. IPR.
That is, unless the U.S., A&B, and other affected nations do not resolve this dispute,
U.S. creators and inventors, IPR owners, and the content aggregation and distribution sectors,
will pay to maintain the protection domestic gambling operations.
The report allows A&B not to enforce rights of U.S. persons with respect to
"Copyright and related rights", "Trademarks", "Industrial
designs", "Patents", and "Protection of undisclosed information".
It adds that "we may not question the complaining party's choice of specific
obligations to be suspended".
A&B had sought billions per year in such damages. The small size of the damages award
is a victory for the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
(OUSTR), which has long fought A&B in this proceeding.
Also, it should also be noted that but for the negligence of the OUSTR in failing to include
gambling services as an exception to the treaty obligations of the U.S. in original
negotiations, and the failure of the Congress to regulate internet gambling in a uniform and
nondiscriminatory manner, A&B could not have maintained this WTO proceeding.
The report states that "the Arbitrator determines that the annual level of nullification
or impairment of benefits accuing to Antigua in this case is US$21 million and that Antigua
has followed the principles and procedures of Article 22.3 of the DSU in determining that it
is not practicable or effective to suspend concessions or other obligations under the GATS
and that the circumstances were serious enough. Accordingly, the Arbitrator determines that
Antigua may request authorization from the DSB, to suspend the obligations under the TRIPS
Agreement ... at a level not exceeding US$21 million annually."
The USTR's Sean Spicer stated in a
release on December 21 that "The United States has already initiated the
formal process under the WTO for clarifying its schedule of commitments and is
engaged in compensation negotiations with Antigua and six other WTO Members that
have claimed to be affected. We announced a compensation agreement with three of
those Members earlier this week, and are continuing discussions with the
others. We would expect that Antigua would not suspend its WTO commitments to
the United States while that process is underway."
See also, USTR
release of December 17.
Sallie James, a trade
policy analyst at the Cato Institute, wrote in a
short piece published in the Cato web site that "The $21 million worth of
pirated software, movies, and music would go on annually unless and until the
United States changes its laws, so we can expect some lobbying from Hollywood to
have the restrictions on internet gambling lifted."
|Sen. Kyl and State AGs Address Rep.
Frank's Internet Gambling Bill and WTO
12/18. Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) spoke in the Senate
opposing HR 2046
"Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act", sponsored by
Frank (D-MA), "or any similar proposals that would create a permissive Federal
licensing scheme for Internet gambling".
Sen. Kyl discussed, and introduced into the record, a letter from numerous state attorneys
general. He said that they "note that the recently enacted Unlawful
Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 has ``effectively driven many illicit
gambling operators from the American marketplace.'' The Frank bill ``proposes to
do the opposite, by replacing state regulations with a federal licensing program
that would permit Internet gambling companies to do business with U.S. customers.´´"
See, Congressional Record, December 18, 2007, at Page S15896.
HR 2046 would provide for the licensing of operators of internet gambling facilities by
the Department of the Treasury's (DOT) Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network (FinCEN). The bill affect, but not not repeal, the
Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA), the statute enacted in
2006 that targets the financial transactions associated with internet gambling.
Last year the Congress enacted the UIGEA. Ultimately, it was not approved as
a stand alone bill, but rather a one component of the unrelated port security
bill, which both the House and Senate approved on September 29, 2006. The larger
bill was HR 4954
(109th Congress), the "Port Security Improvement Act of 2006". It is
now Public Law No. 109-347. Title VIII of this bill is the UIGEA. See, story
titled "House and Senate Approve Port Security Bill With Tech Provisions" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,461, October 4, 2006.
The Frank bill would exempt from the provisions of the UIGEA financial
transactions with licensed operators of internet gambling facilities.
Rep. Frank's bill does not expressly repeal or amend the federal Wire Act, or
preempt any state laws banning any types of gambling or internet gambling.
However, the bill provides that "It shall be a defense against any prosecution
or enforcement action under any Federal or State law against any person
possessing a valid license under this subchapter that the activity is authorized
under and has been carried out lawfully under the terms of this subchapter".
See also, story
titled "Rep. Frank Introduces Bill to Facilitate Licensed Internet Gambling" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
1,574, May 3, 2007.
The state AGs wrote that "A federal license would supersede any state
enforcement action, because §5387 in H.R. 2046 would grant an affirmative
defense against any prosecution or enforcement action under any Federal or State
law to any person who possesses a valid license and complies with the
requirements of H.R. 2046. This divestment of state gambling enforcement power
is sweeping and unprecedented."
They also wrote that "the opt-outs may prove illusory", because they "will
likely be challenged" before the World Trade
Organization (WTO). The AG's add that the WTO "has already shown itself to
be hostile to U.S. restrictions on Internet gambling. If it strikes down state
opt-outs as unduly restrictive of trade, the way will be open to the greatest
expansion of legalized gambling in American history and near total preemption of
State laws restricting Internet gambling."
|SEC and DOJ Fine Lucent $2.5 Million for
Entertaining Chinese Telecom Employees
12/21. The Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) filed
a complaint [15
pages in PDF] in U.S. District Court (DC) against
Lucent Technologies alleging violation of the books and records and internal controls
provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).
The complaint alleges that "From at least 2000 to 2003, Lucent spent over $10 Million
for approximately 1,000 Chinese foreign officials, who were employees of Chinese state-owned
or state-controlled telecommunications enterprises, to travel to the United States and
elsewhere. The Chinese government enterprises were either entities to which Lucent was seeking
to sell its equipment and services or existing Lucent customers."
The complaint continues that "The majority of the trips were ostensibly
designed to allow the Chinese foreign officials to inspect Lucent's facilities
and to train the officials in using Lucent equipment. In fact, during many of
these trips, the officials spent little or not time in the United States
visiting Lucent's facilities. Instead, they visited tourist destinations
throughout the Unites States, such as Hawaii, Las Vegas, the Grand Canyon,
Niagara Falls, Disney World, Universal Studios, and New York City."
The SEC simultaneously announced that it has reached a settlement with Lucent
under which Lucent has agreed to entry of judgment, and pay a $1,500,000 civil fine,
but admitted no wrongdoing. See, SEC
In addition, the Department of Justice
(DOJ) announced that has reached a related settlement with Lucent under which it
will pay a $1,000,000 fine. See, DOJ
Lucent Technologies is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Alcatel-Lucent.
|Cox Discusses Impact of Technology and
Mergers in Securities Markets
12/20. Chris Cox, the Chairman
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) gave a
speech in New
York City in which he addressed the adoption of new technologies by exchanges,
the conversion of mutual exchanges into shareholder owned electronic markets,
and the consequences for efficiency and costs, competition and acquisition, and
globalization of securities markets.
He said that "the same technology that is increasing
productivity in every corner of the economy is fundamentally changing the way
that exchanges themselves operate. As a result of technological advances over
the past decade or so, investors in today's markets enjoy lower costs and more
efficient access to liquidity."
Cox stated that the new more flexible shareholder owned electronic markets
can use new capital to invest in technology that offers customers faster, more
efficient, and lower cost trading.
He also said that "today technology has virtually eliminated the need for
face-to-face trading on the NYSE and everywhere else" and that "the trading
floor itself is becoming obsolete".
Cox elaborated that "The combination of new technology and new legal
structures has been the springboard, first, for dramatic changes in the U.S.
capital markets, and, simultaneously, for the new globalization of markets that
so clearly characterizes the new century. That's because, in addition to
allowing innovation, demutualization has also allowed rapid combinations of
exchanges, both internationally and domestically."
He also reviewed the recent history of mergers of exchange markets, and
the consequences, especially for securities regulators.
|Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red.
|Sunday, December 23
The Senate will meet at 11:00 AM in pro forma session only.
|Monday, December 24
There will be no issue of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert.
All federal executive branch departments and agencies will be closed. See,
Order of December 6, 2007.
Deadline to submit comments to the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) regarding its proposal to amend the Rules of
Practice in Trademark Cases to require a description of the
mark in all applications to register a mark not in standard characters. See,
notice in the Federal Register, October 25, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 206, at Pages
Effective date of the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Second Report
and Order regarding video franchising. This item is FCC 07-190 in MB Docket No. 05-311.
notice in the Federal Register, November 23, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 225, at
Pages 65670-65677. See also, story titled "FCC Adopts 2nd Report and Order on
Video Franchising" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,668, November 2, 2007.
|Wednesday, December 26
There will be no issue of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert.
|Friday, December 28
2:00 PM. Deadline for petitioner (Quanta Computer) to file
its reply brief with the Supreme Court of the US
(SCUS) in Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics, a patent infringement
case. See, story titled "Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Patent Exhaustion
Case" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,647, September 27, 2007.
|Monday, December 31
The research and development tax credit expires.
Deadline to submit comments to the General Services Administration (GSA)
and other agencies in response to the proposal to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) to implement the Governmentwide Enterprise Software Licensing Program, which is also
named SmartBUY. See,
notice in the Federal Register, October 31, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 210, at
|Tuesday, January 1
New Year's Day. See, Office of Personnel Management's (OPM)
list of 2008 federal holidays.
Effective date of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's (SEC) amendments to its proxy rules to require issuers
and other soliciting persons to post their proxy materials on an internet web site, and
to provide shareholders with a notice of the internet availability of the materials. See,
notice in the Federal Register, August 1, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 147, at Pages
42221-42239. See also, story titled "SEC Seeks Comments on Proposal to Mandate
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,529, January 30, 2007.
Effective date of the Copyright
Office's (CO) October 23, 2007,
notice in the Federal Register that contains a final list of stations listed in
affidavits sent to the CO in which the owner or licensee of the station attests that the
station qualifies as a specialty station. The notice states that this list "shall
be used to verify the specialty station status of those stations identified as such by
cable systems on their semi-annual statements of account". See, Federal Register,
October 23, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 204, at Pages 60029-60030, and
17 U.S.C. § 111.
Effective date of the Copyright Royalty Judge's final rule setting the
royalty rates and terms for the use of sound recordings and the making of
ephemeral phonorecords by preexisting subscription services for the period
2008 through 2012. See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 19, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 243, at
|About Tech Law Journal
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
dba Tech Law Journal. All rights reserved.