|Bills Introduced in House and Senate to End
Terrestrial Broadcasters' Performance Right
12/18. Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA)
and others introduced HR 4789
"Performance Rights Act of 2007". Sen. Patrick
Leahy (D-VT) and others introduced S 2500, the companion bill in the Senate. These
bills would end terrestrial broadcasters' exemption from paying copyright royalties when they
play copyrighted songs.
Introduction. Section 106 of the Copyright Act, which is codified at
17 U.S.C. § 106, enumerates the exclusive rights of owners of copyrights.
Section 106(6) currently provides that "the owner of copyright under this title
has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: ... (6) in
the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means
of a digital audio transmission".
17 U.S.C. § 114 then elaborates on what is an exclusive right under
Section 106(6), and what is exempt.
That is, performances by AM and FM radio broadcasters are exempted from the exclusive
rights of copyright holders. These broadcasters do not need to obtain permission, or pay
royalties, for playing copyrighted songs in the U.S.
Broadcasters, who are represented by the National Association
of Broadcasters (NAB), are happy with this arrangement, and therefore oppose this bill.
In contrast, various copyright groups support ending this broadcast performance exception.
Also, various other platforms for music delivery that compete with radio, including webcasting,
satellite radio, and cable, must pay to play.
Rep. Berman (at right), the sponsor of the
bill, is the Chairman of the House Judiciary
Committee's (HJC) Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property. He wrote
in his statement introducing this bill that "This legislation is a first step at ensuring
that all radio platforms are treated in a similar manner and that those who perform music are
paid for their work. This narrowly tailored bill amends a glaring inequity in America’s
copyright law -- the provision in Section 114 that exempts over-the-air broadcasters from
paying those who perform the music that we listen to on AM and FM radio."
Bill Summary. This bill amends Section 106(6) to provide an exclusive right "in
the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of an audio
transmission." It also makes several revisions to Section 114.
Also, the bill provides for special treatment for small, non-commercial,
educational, and religious broadcasters.
For example, the bill provides that "each individual terrestrial broadcast
station that has gross revenues in any calendar year of less than $1,250,000 may
elect to pay for its over-the-air nonsubscription broadcast transmissions a
royalty fee of $5,000 per year, ...", while a "public broadcasting entity ...
may elect to pay for its over-the-air nonsubscription broadcast transmissions a
royalty fee of $1,000 per year ..."
The bill also provides that the performance of a sound recording publicly by means
of an audio transmission is not an infringement of Section 106(6) if the
performance is part of an eligible nonsubscription transmission of either
"services at a place of worship or other religious assembly" or "an incidental
use of a musical sound recording".
That is, no royalties must be paid for the broadcast of a religious service
that includes performance of a copyrighted song.
Rep. Berman stated that "incidental use" would include "brief musical
transitions in and out of commercials or program segments, or brief performances
during news, talk and sports programming". Although, neither this bill, Section
114, Section 106, nor
Section 101 (the definitions section of the Copyright Act), define the term
The bill then amends Section 114 to provide that "Such rates and terms
shall include a per program license option for terrestrial broadcast stations
that make limited feature uses of sound recordings."
Rep. Berman explained that "This section allows terrestrial radio stations to
obtain program licenses for sound recordings (at separately set rates), in lieu
of blanket licenses. In some cases, a radio station may not make many featured
uses of music, for example a mixed-format station. In such cases, rather than
requiring a station to pay a general blanket license fee in the same amount paid
by a station that primarily makes featured uses of music, this section requires
the Copyright Royalty Board to establish a ``per program license´´ so that such
stations can choose only to pay for the music they use, which may be less costly
than the general blanket license. This parallels the licenses offered by the
performance rights organizations for performing the underlying musical
copyright." (Parentheses and internal quotations in original.)
The bill also provides that "Nothing in this Act shall adversely
affect in any respect the public performance rights of or royalties payable to
songwriters or copyright owners of musical works."
Sponsors' Statements. The original cosponsors of the bill in the House are
Rep. John Conyers (D-MI),
Rep. John Shadegg (R-AZ),
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA),
Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), and
Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA). The Senate cosponsors
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT),
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and
Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN).
Sen. Leahy, the Chairman of the Senate
Judiciary Committee (SJC), wrote in his introduction statement that "artists should be
compensated fairly for the use of their work". See, Sen. Leahy's
summary, and release.
He elaborated that "When radio stations broadcast music, listeners are
enjoying the intellectual property of two creative artists – the songwriter and
the performer. The success, and the artistic quality, of any recorded song
depends on both. Radio stations pay songwriters for a license to broadcast the
music they have composed. That is proper, and that is fair. The songwriters’
work is promoted by the air play, but no one seriously questions that the songwriter should
be paid for the use of his or her work. But the performing artist is not paid by the
radio station. The time has come to end this inequity."
Rep. Conyers, the Chairman of the HJC, stated that "Today we take the first
step toward finally giving artists and musicians their fair due ... They are the
people who bring the music to life and should no longer be overlooked. My
decision to take a leading role to remedy this inequity in no way alters my
commitment to working with the songwriters to ensure that their rights and
compensation are protected.”
More Reaction to Bill. Sen. Arlen Specter
(R-PA), the ranking Republican on the SJC is not a cosponsor. He stated in a
release that "I welcome Senator Leahy and Hatch's introduction
of the Performance Rights Act, and I commend their efforts to tackle perceived
inequities in the treatment of music within the Copyright Code."
He added that "I am very interested in the issues involved in the
performance rights debate, and I will continue to analyze the Performance Rights
Act to ensure it achieves a proper balance amongst the recording artists,
songwriters and broadcasters."
He concluded that "This legislation is a positive step in the dialogue
between the Congress and interested industries regarding performance rights. I
agree that some changes in the existing law are necessary, but I would like to
give interested parties an opportunity to give me the benefit of their thinking
before I make a final decision on this important matter."
The NAB's Dennis Wharton stated in a
release that "After decades of Ebenezer Scrooge-like exploitation of
countless artists, RIAA and the foreign-owned record labels are singing a new
holiday jingle to offset their failing business model".
He added that the "NAB will aggressively oppose this brazen attempt to force
America's hometown radio stations to subsidize companies that have profited
enormously through the free promotion provided by radio airplay."
Related Congressional Activity. On October 31, 2007,
Rep. Gene Green (D-TX) and others introduced
It states that the "Congress should not impose any new performance fee, tax, royalty,
or other charge relating to the public performance of sound recordings on a local radio
station for broadcasting sound recordings over-the-air, or on any business for such public
performance of sound recordings."
As of December 18, 2007, this resolution had 122 cosponsors.
Also, the HJC's SCIIP held a hearing on July 31, 2007, titled "Ensuring Artists Fair
Compensation: Updating the Performance Right and Platform Parity for the 21st Century".
testimony [1 page in PDF] of Rep. Paul Hodes (D-NH),
testimony [16 pages in PDF] of Marybeth Peters (Register of Copyright),
testimony [6 pages in PDF] of Judy Collins (recording artist),
testimony [20 pages in PDF] of Charles Warfield (ICBC Broadcast Holding,
prepared testimony [6 pages in PDF] of Sam Moore (recording artist).
Peters wrote that "Congress has repeatedly
recognized the emergence of technological threats to the creators of sound
"What is needed is a change to ensure that performers and record
companies can continue to make a viable living from their craft." She suggested
that "an expansion of the performance right for sound recordings would I believe
provide fair compensation to the creators and serve as a significant stimulus to
ensure that creators continue to develop new works throughout the 21st Century."
Warfield, who testified for the NAB, wrote that the radio and music industries have a
relationship of "mutual collaboration" which is embodied in the broadcast performance
right. He argued that radio stations advertise the music that they play. He said that ending
this exemption would be a "tax".
He said that "The recording industry’s pursuit of a performance
tax at this time appears directly linked to the loss of revenues from the sale
of music. This should not be a basis for the imposition of such a tax and radio
should not be responsible for the loss of revenue from physical sales in the
recording industry. A performance tax would harm the beneficial relationship
that exists between the recording industry and the radio industry."
|1st Circuit Holds Copyright Act Limitation
Applies to State Law Claim for Accounting for Sales of Items for which Copyright
Ownership is Disputed
12/13. The U.S. Court of Appeals (1stCir) issued
opinion in Cambridge Literary Properties, Ltd. v. W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik,
affirming the summary judgment of the District Court for the defendant in an action for an
accounting regarding the sale of copyrighted works. The issue is which statute of limitations
Cambridge Literary Properties (CLP) filed a complaint in U.S. District Court
(DMass), based upon diversity of citizenship, against W. Goebel Porzellanfabrik
and others seeking an accounting and share of the profits, under state law,
regarding the sale of figurines and images in which it claims a copyright
interest. The complaint does not plead copyright infringement, or seek a
declaration of ownership of copyright, although this fact is in dispute.
Basically, CLP filed its complaint beyond the limitation set by the Copyright
Act for claims to establish copyright ownership, but within the state statute's
limitation for claims for an accounting.
The Court of Appeals held that the Copyright Act limitation applies, and
therefore affirmed the summary judgment of the District Court for the defendant.
The Court of Appeals reasoned that "The accounting and equitable trust claims
created by state law are premature. Such claims may well be governed by state
law, but they are not ripe and necessarily rest upon plaintiff having met the
antecedent showing that it has ownership rights under the Copyright Act.
Plaintiff may not assert the state-law claims for accounting or equitable trust
without establishing that it is a co-owner. Whether Cambridge is a co-owner in
turn depends, on the facts of this case, upon the federal Copyright Act. This in
turn requires that Cambridge have asserted its ownership claims within that
statute's limitations period."
Judge Cyr wrote in his dissenting opinion that this holding "threatens to
draw into the federal courts many copyright-related claims over which Congress
deliberately intended to give the state courts concurrent jurisdiction".
This case is Cambridge Literary Properties, No. U.S. Court of Appeals
for the 1st Circuit, App. Ct. 06-2339, an appeal from the U.S. District Court
for the District of Massachusetts. Judge Lynch wrote the opinion of the Court of
Appeals, in which Howard joined. Judge Cyr wrote a dissenting opinion.
|More IPR News
12/18. The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced in
release that a federal grand jury in Puerto Rico returned indictments that charge 26
individuals with violations to
U.S.C. §§ 506(a)(1) & (b) and
U.S.C. § 2319 (b)(1) in connection with reproducing and distributing music CDs and DVDs
for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain. The DOJ also stated that
this follows the seizure in Puerto Rico by various federal government agencies, working with
the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and the
Recording Industry of Association of America (RIAA), of more
than 53,000 counterfeit music CDs and DVDs in flea markets in Puerto Rico.
12/18. The U.S. Court of Appeals (9thCir) issued
opinion [6 pages in PDF] in K and N Engineering v. Bulat, a
case regarding remedies for trademark counterfeiting. The Court of Appeals held
that an election to receive statutory damages under
15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) precludes an award of attorney’s fees under 15 U.S.C. §
1117(b). Hence, it reversed the judgment of the District Court. This case is
K and N Engineering, Inc. v. Sarah Bulat, et al., U.S. Court of Appeals for
the 9th Circuit, App. Ct. No. 06-55393, an appeal from the U.S. District Court
for the Central District of California, D.C. No. CV-04-09707-AHM, Judge Howard
Matz presiding. Judge Sandra Ikuta wrote the opinion of the Court of Appeals, in
which Judges Thomas Nelson and Randy Smith joined.
|Chertoff Addresses Terrorism and
12/18. Michael Chertoff, the Secretary of Homeland Security, gave a
Dublin, Ireland. He addressed threats posed by terrorists, including uses of new
technologies, and things that governments are doing in response, including
collection and sharing of identification information.
He stated that "I would say
this threat is particularly exacerbated because we live in a world in which
technology has given even the individual terrorist much more leverage than was
true 20, 50 or 75 years ago: the ability to use the Internet to communicate and
create networks; the ability to use technology to develop biological, chemical,
even radiological and nuclear weapons. What this has created is the threat that
even a small group getting control of a small portion of a state could build
laboratories and other facilities that would allow them to put together
capabilities that would enable the waging of war on a scale that a hundred years
ago required a powerful nation-state."
He also discussed the US-EU passenger name record agreement, and other
intelligence and identification efforts. He said that "there is a perception
that somehow America is an outlier, that America is Big Brother looking to
collect information in a way that is at odds with the general trend in Europe
and in other free parts of the world."
He asserted that "that perception is clearly at odds with reality, for it is
precisely in those nations that share our commitment to democratic values and
freedom that we see a similar movement to what I would consider to be a reasonable and
balanced approach to identifying people who are threats to security."
"What we're seeing, then, in Japan, in Southeast Asia, in Europe, is that
many countries around the world are beginning to take a converging approach to
the management of intelligence and information to identify those who are a
threat to all of our free societies", said Chertoff.
|Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red.
|Wednesday, December 19
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for legislative
business. The House may consider several non-technology
related items under suspension of the rules. It may also approve the Senate
amendment to the AMT bill, the Senate amendments to the foreign operations
appropriations bill, and HJRes 72, the continuing resolution. See, Rep. Hoyer's
schedule for the week and
schedule for Wednesday.
The Senate will meet at 11:30 AM.
10:00 AM. The Senate Judiciary
Committee (SJC) will hold a hearing on the nomination of Judge Mark Filip to be
the Deputy Attorney General. See, Sen. Patrick Leahy's
(D-VT) release and SJC
Room 226, Dirksen Building.
6:00 - 9:15 PM. The DC Bar
Association will host a continuing legal education (CLE) program titled "2007
Intellectual Property Law: Year in Review Series - Part I". Part I will address
developments in copyright, trademark, and internet law. The speakers will be Brian Banner,
Justyna Burr, and Terence Ross. The price to attend ranges from $80 to $115. For more
information, call 202-626-3488. See,
notice. Location: DC Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H St., NW.
Deadline to submit initial comments to the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) in response to its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) regarding ancillary
terrestrial components (ATC), which allow mobile satellite service (MSS) operators to
integrate terrestrial services into their satellite networks in order to augment coverage
in areas where their satellite signals are largely unavailable due to blocking, by re-using
their assigned MSS frequencies. This item is FCC 07-194 in IB Docket No. 07-253. See,
in the Federal Register, November 19, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 222, at Pages 64979-64980.
|Thursday, December 20
The House will meet at 10:00 AM for legislative business. See, Rep.
schedule for the week.
10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The Department of State's (DOS)
Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) will meet to prepare
advice on U.S. positions on the restructuring of the Radiocommunication Sector
of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU-R). See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 7, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 235, at
Page 69279. Location: Boeing Company, 1200 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.
1:00 PM. The National Science Foundation's (NSF) National Science Board's
(NSB) Public Service Award Committee will hold a closed meeting by teleconference. See,
notice in the Federal Register, November 30, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 230, at
Page 67761. Location: NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The DC Bar
Association will host a continuing legal education (CLE) program titled "2007
Intellectual Property Law: Year in Review Series - Part II". Part II will address
developments in patent law. The speakers will be Bradley Wright and Eric Wright. The price
to attend ranges from $80 to $115. For more information, call 202-626-3488. See,
notice. Location: DC Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H St., NW.
|Friday, December 21
The House will meet at 9:00 AM for legislative
business. See, Rep. Hoyer's
schedule for the week.
12:00 NOON. Deadline to submit initial comments to the Office of
the US Trade Representative (OUSTR) regarding compliance with
telecommunications trade agreements. See,
notice in the Federal Register, November 19, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 222, at
Deadline to submit initial comments to the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) in response to its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) regarding hearing
aids and wireless handsets. This item is FCC 07-192 in WT Docket No. 07-250. See,
notice in the Federal Register, November 21, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 224, at Pages 65494-65508.
See also, story titled "FCC Releases 2nd Report and Order and NPRM on Hearing Aids and
Wireless Handsets" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,672, November 8, 2007.
Deadline to submit comments to the Office of
the US Trade Representative (OUSTR) regarding the US complaint to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) regarding the People's
Republic of China's (PRC) trade barriers and market
access restrictions affecting movies and audio recordings. See,
notice in the Federal Register, November 8, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 216, at
Deadline to submit to the National Cable and
Telecommunications Association (NCTA) proposals for 2008 NCTA Technical Papers.
|Monday, December 24
There will be no issue of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert.
All federal executive branch departments and agencies will be closed. See,
Order of December 6, 2007.
Deadline to submit comments to the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) regarding its proposal to amend the Rules of
Practice in Trademark Cases to require a description of the
mark in all applications to register a mark not in standard characters. See,
notice in the Federal Register, October 25, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 206, at Pages
Effective date of the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Second Report
and Order regarding video franchising. This item is FCC 07-190 in MB Docket No. 05-311.
notice in the Federal Register, November 23, 2007, Vol. 72, No. 225, at
Pages 65670-65677. See also, story titled "FCC Adopts 2nd Report and Order on
Video Franchising" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,668, November 2, 2007.
|About Tech Law Journal
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
dba Tech Law Journal. All rights reserved.