| House to Take Up Broadcast Decency 
Enforcement Act | 
               
              
                | 
 2/15. The 
House Rules Committee adopted a
rule for consideration of
HR 310, 
the "Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005". It is a structured rule 
that makes in order only one
amendment 
[PDF], offered by Rep. Fred Upton 
(R-MI) and Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA). 
This is an amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by the sponsors of 
the bill. It makes several changes to the bill as approved by the 
House Commerce 
Committee on February 9, 2005. Several of these changes make it harder for the 
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to find 
individuals, such as performers, liable for violations. For example, it 
would change the current standard for individuals from "willfully or 
intentionally made the utterance" to "willfully and intentionally made the 
utterance, knowing or having reason to know that the utterance would be 
broadcast". 
The amendment in the nature of a substitute would also require the FCC, in 
proceedings against individuals, to take into consideration "the financial impact 
of a forfeiture penalty on that individual". 
See also, story titled "House Commerce Committee Approves Bill to Increase 
Broadcast Indecency Fines" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,074, Feb. 10, 2005. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | 9th Circuit Issues En Banc Opinion in 
Gator.com v. L.L.Bean | 
               
              
                | 
 2/15. The U.S. Court of Appeals 
(9thCir) issued it en banc
opinion [32 pages in PDF] in Gator.com 
v. L.L.Bean, a case involving pop up ads on web sites, and trademarks. 
The majority held that since the parties just settled all issues in the case, 
except the dispute over whether the District Court has personal jurisdiction 
over L.L.Bean, the appeal is moot, and the case must be dismissed. 
The parties have settled their dispute. Moreover, opinions regarding 
application of the Article III case or controversy requirement to appeals in 
settled declaratory judgment actions may not be important. Nevertheless, this en 
banc decision is significant to the extent that it leaves unresolved issues 
regarding when web based activity can serve as the basis for personal 
jurisdiction over an out of state company that engages in e-commerce. 
There is considerable variation among different countries, different federal 
circuits, and within the 9th Circuit. The District Court and three judge panel 
reached opposite conclusions. The en banc panel's dissent noted that "We 
vacated the decision of the three-judge panel when we 
took the appeal en banc, but the panel decision is in the Federal Reporter for 
anyone to read." 
The dissent added that "The disarray in our case law is patent. 
How else to explain such dramatically different holdings from our judges -- one 
judge dismissing for lack of jurisdiction and three judges holding that there is 
general jurisdiction? It is not only the litigants in this case that would 
benefit from an en banc opinion in this appeal. All potential litigants in this 
circuit would benefit." 
The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to take a case that involves personal 
jurisdiction and web based activity. The present case is unlikely to serve as a 
vehicle for Supreme Court review. 
L.L.Bean is a corporation based in the 
state of Maine that sells clothing and related items to consumers by direct mail 
and over the internet. Its offices, and manufacturing and distribution 
facilities, are located in Maine. It has some stores, but none in the state of 
California. While it sells to customers in California by mail and internet, and 
mails catalogues to persons in California, it has no presence there. 
Gator.com, which is now Claria Corporation, 
is Delaware corporation with its principle place of business in California. It developed 
and distributed software for use by consumers that, among other things, caused pop up ads 
to appear over the e-commerce web sites visited by consumers using the software. 
L.L.Bean wrote a letter to Gator.com, in California, demanding that it cease 
violating its trademark rights. 
Gator filed a complaint in U.S. 
District Court (NDCal) against L.L.Bean seeking declaratory relief that its 
software does not violate L.L.Bean's state or federal trademark or other rights. 
L.L.Bean moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over 
it. The District Court dismissed the complaint. Gator appealed. 
A three judge panel of the Appeals Court reversed. On September 2, 2003, it 
issued its
opinion [16 pages in PDF] holding that L.L. Bean has 
substantial or continuous and systematic contacts with California sufficient to 
support a finding of general jurisdiction. See, story titled 
"9th Circuit Rules on Personal Jurisdiction Over Internet Retailers" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail 
Alert No. 731, September 3, 2003. 
On April 29, 2004 the Court of Appeals ordered that the case be reheard en 
banc. After briefing and oral argument before the en banc panel, the parties 
reached a confidential settlement of the case. 
The Court wrote that "Under the terms of the settlement, Gator 
agreed to place no more than twenty-five pop-up advertisements per month on the 
L. L. Bean website between August 21, 2004, and November 20, 2004. The agreement 
further provided that, after this three-month period had elapsed, Gator would 
permanently discontinue the use of all such advertisements on the L. L. Bean 
website. Gator also agreed to make a monetary payment to L. L. Bean. In exchange 
for these concessions, L. L. Bean renounced all claims arising from Gator's use 
of pop-up advertisements prior to -- or in accordance with -- the agreement." 
However, both parties also wrote to the Court of Appeals that 
this settlement "does not provide for the dismissal 
of this appeal." 
The majority of the en banc panel disagreed, and on its own motion dismissed 
the appeal for mootness, based upon the settlement. It wrote that Article III of 
the U.S. Constitution limits the federal courts' jurisdiction to "cases and 
controversies", and that "Because the parties’ 
settlement agreement has wholly eviscerated the dispute that prompted Gator to 
initiate this suit, Gator’s request for declaratory relief no longer gives rise 
to a live case or controversy." 
However, Judge Fletcher wrote a dissent, 
in which Judges Graber and Paez joined. He wrote that "The parties continue to 
dispute whether a federal district court in California has personal jurisdiction 
over L.L. Bean. They have disputed this since the beginning of this litigation. 
Both parties had, and still have, an interest in our resolution of that dispute. 
Depending on how we resolve it, either Gator owes L.L. Bean $10,000 or it does 
not. Nothing more is required for our continuing jurisdiction." 
This case is Gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals 
for the 9th Circuit, App. Ct. No. 02-15035, an appeal from the U.S. District 
Court for the Northern District of California, Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena 
James presiding, D.C. No. CV-01-01126-MEJ. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | 10th Circuit Rules in Copyright Case 
Involving Karaoke Sound Recordings | 
               
              
                | 
 2/14. The U.S. Court of Appeals 
(10thCir) issued its
opinion in Palladium Music v. Eatsleepmusic, a copyright case 
involving karaoke music tracks. The District Court, and Appeals Court, held that 
the karaoke producer, which did not obtain license from the owners of the 
underlying works, has no claim for copyright infringement against a third party 
that took its recordings and distributed them over the internet. The Court held 
that the karaoke producer's works are derivative works, and its copyrights in 
the sound recordings are invalid and unenforceable because it failed to obtain 
compulsory or consensual licenses from the copyright owners of the underlying 
musical compositions as required by
17 U.S.C. § 115. 
Palladium Music, Inc. produced sound recordings of popular music hits that 
enable people to sing along with these popular hits. While Palladium produces a 
sound similar to that of the original artist, it does not incorporate any 
previously recorded sound components in its productions. Its products are 
original sound recording of previously copyrighted musical compositions. In the 
late 1990s Palladium produced and sold these sound recordings without licensing 
from the copyright owners the underlying musical works. Palladium registered 
copyrights with the U.S. Copyright Office. 
Eatsleepmusic, Inc. (ESM) then delivered Palladium's sound recordings through 
ESM's online digital delivery services, without license from Palladium. 
Palladium filed a complaint in U.S. District Court (WDOkla) against ESM and 
another entity alleging copyright infringement. The owners of the underlying 
musical works are not parties to this appeal. 
The District Court held that Palladium does not own valid copyrights for its 
sound recordings, and thus cannot maintain an action for copyright infringement. 
Palladium appealed. 
The Court of Appeals affirmed. 
It began with the statement that "To establish copyright infringement, a 
plaintiff must prove (1) ownership of a valid copyright and (2) unauthorized 
copying of constituent elements of the work that are original." Moreover, "A 
plaintiff's presentation of a certificate of registration from the U.S. 
Copyright Office usually constitutes prima facie evidence of a valid copyright 
and of the facts stated in the certificate." However, a defendant may rebut this 
presumption. 
The Court next reasoned that Palladium's recordings are derivative works 
within the meaning of
17 U.S.C. § 101. 
This section provides, in part, that "A ``derivative work´´ is a work based 
upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, 
dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art 
reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be 
recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, 
annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent 
an original work of authorship, is a ``derivative work´´." 
Then,
17 U.S.C. § 106, which identifies the exclusive rights of copyright, 
enumerates the right "to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted 
work". 
The Court continued that the exclusive rights of copyright owners are limited 
by the compulsory licensing provisions of
17 U.S.C. § 115. But, Palladium did not fulfill the requirements of this 
section. The Court wrote that "the exclusive rights of copyright owners of 
previously published musical works are limited only in that they are required 
(hence the term "compulsory") to license the work to a party who has complied 
with Section 115. The concept is simple.  In order for a party in 
Palladium's position to lawfully use preexisting, copyrighted musical works to 
create and sell its sound recordings, it must first secure the appropriate 
licensing from the copyright owners of those musical works. ... By failing to 
comply with Section 115, Palladium has illegally used the preexisting material. 
See 17 U.S.C. § 103(a). As a result, Palladium's 
copyrights in the sound recordings at issue are invalid and unenforceable." 
This case is Palladium Music, Inc. v. Eatsleepmusic Inc. and Tennessee 
Production Center, Inc., d/b/a Chartbuster Karaoke, U.S. Court of Appeals 
for the 10th Circuit, App. Ct. Nos. 04-6061 and 04-6097, appeals from the U.S. 
District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, D.C. No. CIV-03-206-A. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Panel Discusses Adoption of Info Tech by 
Government  | 
               
              
                | 
 2/15. The Cato Institute hosted a book forum. 
William Eggers discussed 
his book titled
Government 2.0: Using Technology to Improve Education, Cut Red Tape, Reduce 
Gridlock, and Enhance Democracy [Amazon]. 
Eggers reviewed how information technologies are changing government, with 
emphasis on education and transportation. For example, he said the new 
technologies could lead to per mile pricing for road use, and thereby replace 
the gas tax. He suggested that road could become like utilities. 
Robert 
Atkinson (PPI),  Stephen 
Slivinski (Cato) commented on the book and the use of information technology in 
government. Jim Harper (Cato) 
moderated. 
Robert Atkinson is VP of the Progressive 
Policy Institute (PPI), a Democratic think tank based in Washington DC. He is also 
the Director of its Technology and New Economy Project. He has also just authored a book 
titled 
The Past And Future Of America's Economy: Long Waves Of Innovation That Power 
Cycles Of Growth [Amazon]. 
Atkinson argues in his book that there have been periodic transformations of 
the economy that have resulted from new technologies. In the late 1800s 
electricity and cheap steel led to a factory based economy. In the mid 20th 
Century, automation, electronics and chemicals led to a mass production economy. 
And, since the 1990s there has been an information technology revolution. 
Atkinson argued at the book forum that transformations in the economy cause, on 
a time lagged basis, transformations in government. Thus, the factory based 
economy ultimately contributed to the progressive era changes in government. He 
said that the information technology revolution will, eventually, revolutionize 
government, and for the better. 
Stephen Slivinski, a Cato libertarian, stated that he worries that adoption 
of information technologies by government may not result in a reduced scope of 
government. Rather, new technologies may create a "Leviathan with e-mail". See, 
Encyclopedia Britannica
entry on Leviathan, 
Thomas Hobbes's 1651 book titled
Leviathan [Amazon], and Robert Higgs' 1987 book titled
Crisis and Leviathan [Amazon]. 
He also said that adoption of information technology by government agencies 
may result in cost savings, which in turn, could enable these agencies to expand 
their programs. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | People and Appointments | 
               
              
                | 
 2/15. The Senate confirmed Michael Chertoff to Secretary of Homeland 
Security by a vote of 98-0. See,
Roll Call No. 10. Harriet Miers promptly administered the oath of office. 
She is Counsel to the President. She replaced Alberto Gonzales, who is now 
Attorney General. See, White House
release. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | More News | 
               
              
                | 
 2/15. The 
House Rules Committee adopted a
rule for consideration of
S 5, the 
"Class Action Fairness Act of 2005". It is a structured rule that 
makes in order only one 
amendment [27 pages in PDF], offered by
Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) and other 
Democrats. It is an amendment in the nature of a substitute. The Senate approved
S 5 by a vote of 72-26 
on February 10, 2005. See,
Roll Call No. 9 and story titled "Senate Approves Class Action Reform Bill" 
in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,075, February 11, 2005.  
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
                  subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
                  to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
                  are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
                  month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
                  subscriptions are available for journalists,
                  federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
                  executive branch. The TLJ web site is
                  free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not 
                  published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
                  information page. 
                   
                  Contact: 202-364-8882. 
                  P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008. 
                  
                    
                  Privacy
                  Policy 
                  Notices
                  & Disclaimers 
                  Copyright 1998 - 2005 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved.  | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
        
          
            
              
                | Publication Schedule | 
               
              
                David Carney, author of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert, is on jury duty. 
                This is limiting the scope of coverage in issues this week, and may affect the 
                publication schedule.  | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                Washington Tech Calendar 
                New items are highlighted in red. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Wednesday, February 16 | 
               
              
                | 
                 The House will meet at 10:00 AM for legislative business. It may take up
  HR 310, 
  the "Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005", and/or
  S 5, the 
  "Class Action Fairness Act of 2005". See,
  Republican Whip 
  Notice. 
                The Senate will meet at 9:30 AM. It will consider S 384, the "Nazi 
  War Crimes Working Group Extension Act". 
                The Supreme Court is in 
  recess until February 22, 2005. 
                8:45 - 10:00 AM. The New America 
  Foundation (NAF) will host a breakfast and panel discussion titled "Education 
  Revolution: How Investing in E-Learning R&D Could Dramatically Improve Educational 
  Productivity". The speakers will be Michael Calabrese (NAF),
  Newton Minow 
  (Sidley Austin), Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), 
  Thomas Stratmann (George 
  Mason University), Eamon Kelly (Tulane University), and Larry Grossman. See,
  notice. 
  RSVP to Naveen Lakshmipathy at 202-986-2700 or
  lakshmipathy@newamerica.net. 
  Location: Room 628, Dirksen Building, Capitol Hill. 
                9:00 AM. The Campaign 
  Legal Center (CLC) will host a news conference titled "Public Interest Public 
  Airwaves". For more information, contact Stephanie Collier (CLC) at 202 736-2200. 
  Location: Zenger Room, National Press Club, 529 
  14th St. NW, 13th Floor. 
                10:00 AM. The House Commerce 
  Committee's Subcommittee on Trade, Commerce and Consumer Protection will meet to 
  mark up HR 29, 
  the "The Securely Protect Yourself Against Cyber Trespass Act" or Spy Act. 
  The meeting will be webcast by the Committee. Press contact: Jon Tripp (Barton) at 202 
  225-5735 or Paul Flusche (Stearns) at 202 225-5744. Location: Room 2123, Rayburn 
  Building. 
                10:00 AM. The Senate Banking 
  Committee will hold a hearing titled "The Federal Reserve's First 
  Monetary Policy Report to Congress for 2005". 
  Federal Reserve Board Chairman
  Alan Greenspan 
  will testify. See,
  
  notice. Location: Room 106, Dirksen Building. 
                10:00 AM. The Senate 
  Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee will hold a hearing titled 
  "Transforming Government for the 21st Century". See, 
  notice. 
  Location: Room 342, Dirksen Building. 
                11:00 AM - 1:00 PM. The House 
  Science Committee will hold a hearing titled "An Overview of the Federal 
  R&D Budget for Fiscal Year 2006". The scheduled witnesses are  
  John Marburger (Director of the 
  White House Office of Science and Technology Policy),
  Samuel Bodman 
  (Secretary of Energy), 
  Arden Bement 
  (Director of the National Science Foundation),
  Charles 
  McQueary (Undersecretary for Science and Technology at the 
  Department of Homeland Security), and 
  Theodore Kassinger 
  (Deputy Secretary of Commerce). Press contact: Joe Pouliot at 202 225-0581. Location: 
  Room 2318, Rayburn Building. 
                12:00 NOON. Intel will host a news conference titled 
  "Benchmarks of Innovation". For more information, contact Jennifer Greeson at 
  202 320-8532. Location: Murrow Room, National Press 
  Club, 529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor. 
                12:30 - 1:45 PM. The Federal Communications 
  Bar Association (FCBA) will host a lunch. The speaker will be Mel Karmazin, 
  CEO of Sirius Satellite Radio. Prices range from 
  $35 to $65. The deadline to register is February 11. See, 
  registration 
  form [MS Word]. Location: Mayflower Hotel, East Room, 1127 Connecticut 
  Ave., NW. 
                2:00 PM. The House Homeland Security Committee's 
  Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk 
  Assessment will hold a hearing titled "The Proposed Fiscal Year 2006 
  Budget: Building the Information Analysis Capability of DHS". The 
  witnesses will include Patrick Hughes of the 
  Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Location: Room 2261, Rayburn 
  Building. 
                2:00 - 4:00 PM. The Department of State's 
  International 
  Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) will meet by teleconference to prepare 
  for the International Telecommunications Union's 
  (ITU) Telecommunication Standardization Advisory Group (TSAG) meeting. See, the ITU's
  calendar of 
  meetings. See,
  
  notice in the Federal Register, December 20, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 243, at Page 
  76027. For more information, including the call in information, contact Julian 
  Minard at minardje@state.gov. 
                3:00 PM. The 
  Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil 
  Rights, and Property Rights will hold a hearing titled "Obscenity 
  Prosecution and the Constitution". The witnesses will be Robert Destro 
  (Catholic University of America), William Wagner (Thomas M. Cooley Law 
  School), and Frederick Schauer (John F. Kennedy School of Government). See,
  notice. Press 
  contact: Blain Rethmeier (Specter) at 202 224-5225 or Tracy Schmaler (Leahy) at 202 224-2154. 
  Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building. 
                Day four of a four day event hosted by the 
  National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) titled 
  "2005 Winter Committee Meetings". See, 
  notice. Location: Hyatt Regency Washington. 
                Deadline to submit initial comments to the
  Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 
  regarding BellSouth's and Sprint's petition for reconsideration of the FCC's 
  schools and libraries Fifth Report and Order. The FCC adopted this 5th R&O at 
  its August 4, 2004 meeting, and released it on August 13, 2004. See, FCC
  Public 
  Notice (DA 05-103). This 5th R&O is FCC 04-190 in CC Docket No. 02-6. 
                Deadline to submit comments to the
  Copyright Office in response to its
  
  notice in the Federal Register requesting comments regarding whether the
  2005 cable statutory license rate adjustment proceeding should take 
  place under the auspices of the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP) 
  system or the new Copyright Royalty Judge (CRJ) system. See, Federal Register, 
  January 26, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 16, at Pages 3738 - 3739. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Thursday, February 17 | 
               
              
                | 
                 The House will meet at 10:00 AM for legislative 
  business. It may take up
  HR 310, 
  the "Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005", and/or
  S 5, the 
  "Class Action Fairness Act of 2005". See,
  Republican Whip 
  Notice. 
                9:00 - 11:00 AM. The DC Bar Association 
  will host a panel discussion titled "Broadband Over Power Lines: Does It 
  Work, How Does It Work, and How Will It Be Regulated?" The scheduled 
  speakers are Kathleen 
  Abernathy (FCC Commissioner), 
  Nora Brownell 
  (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), Laura Chappelle (Chairman of the 
  Michigan Public Service Commission), 
  James Bolin (Current Technologies), 
  Jonathan Frankel (Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr), 
  and David Konuch (Fleischman & Walsh). See,
  
  notice. Prices vary from $25 to $35. For more information, call 202 
  626-3463. Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H St., NW. 
                9:30 AM. The
  House Commerce Committee's Subcommittee 
  on Telecommunications and the Internet will hold a hearing titled "The Role of 
  Technology in Achieving a Hard Deadline for the DTV Transition". The hearing 
  will be webcast by the Committee. Press contact: Jon Tripp (Barton) at 202 225-5735 or 
  Sean Bonyun (Upton) at 202 225-3761. Location: Room 2123, Rayburn Building. 
                9:30 AM. The Senate Judiciary 
  Committee will hold an executive business meeting. It will consider
  S 256, 
  the "Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005". See,
  notice. Press 
  contact: Blain Rethmeier (Specter) at 202 224-5225, or Tracy Schmaler (Leahy) at 202 
  224-2154. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building. 
                9:30 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals 
  (DCCir) will hear oral argument in SBC Communications v. FCC, 
  No. 03-1147, a petition for review of a Forfeiture Order in which the FCC held 
  that SBC violated the provision of the FCC's order approving the merger of SBC 
  and Ameritech which required SBC to offer access to the shared transport element 
  of its telephone network to competitors in five midwestern states. See, FCC's 
  brief [38 pages 
  in PDF]. Location: Prettyman Courthouse, 333 Constitution Ave., NW. 
                9:30 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals 
  (DCCir) will hear oral argument in MGM v. Marybeth Peters, 
  No. 04-5142, and Universal City Studios v. Marybeth Peters, 
  No.04-5138.  Judges Edwards, Rogers and Williams will preside. Location: 
  Prettyman Courthouse, 333 Constitution Ave., NW. 
                9:30 AM - 12:00 NOON. The Federal Communications 
  Commission's (FCC) will host an event titled "Telecommunications 
  Services Priority (TSP) Summit". See,
  notice 
  and agenda [PDF]. Location: FCC, Commission Meeting Room (TW-C305), 
  445 12th St., SW. 
                10:00 AM. The House Judiciary 
  Committee's Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet and Intellectual Property will hold 
  a hearing on HR 683, the "Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2005". 
  Press contact: Jeff Lungren or Terry Shawn at 202 225-2492. Location: Room 2141, 
  Rayburn Building. 
                10:00 AM. The
  House Appropriations Committee's 
  Subcommittee on Homeland Security will hold a hearing titled "Department of 
  Homeland Security Management and Operations". Location: Room 2359, Rayburn 
  Building. 
                10:00 AM. Alan 
  Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal 
  Reserve Board, will testify before the 
  House Financial Services Committee on 
  monetary policy and the state of the economy. Location: Room 2128, Rayburn Building. 
                12:00 NOON - 2:00 PM. The DC Bar 
  Association will host a panel discussion titled "Developments In 
  U.S.-Russian Trade And Business Relations". The scheduled speakers are 
  Andrey Dolgorukov (Trade Representative of the Russian Federation to the 
  U.S.), Eugene Lawson (P/CEO of the U.S.-Russia Business Council), Richard Dean 
  (Coudert Brothers), and Geoffrey Goodale (Gardner Carton & Douglas). See, 
  
  notice. Prices vary from $25 to $35. For more information, call 202 
  626-3463. Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H St., NW. 
                1:30 PM. The House Ways and Means 
  Committee's Subcommittee on Trade will hold an organizational meeting. Location: Room 
  1129, Longworth Building. 
                2:00 - 4:00 PM. The
  Federal Communications Commission's (FCC)
  WRC 07 Advisory Committee, Informal 
  Working Group 3: IMT-2000 and 2.5 GHz Sharing Issues will meet. See, FCC
  notice 
  [PDF]. Location: FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, South Conference Room (6th Floor, Room 
  6-B516). 
                4:00 PM. Glynn Lunney (Tulane 
  University Law School) will present a draft paper titled "Patents and 
  Growth: Empirical Evidence from the States". See,
  abstract 
  of paper, and  
  notice of event. This event is part of the Spring 2005 Intellectual Property 
  Workshop Series sponsored by the Dean Dinwoodey Center for Intellectual Property Studies 
  at the George Washington University Law School 
  (GWULS). For more information, contact Robert Brauneis at 202 994-6138 or 
  rbraun at law dot gwu dot edu. The event is free 
  and open to the public. Location: GWULS, Faculty Conference Center, Burns 
  Building, 5th Floor, 716 20th St., NW. 
                Deadline to submit reply comments to the 
  Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 
  response to its Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (2FNPRM) regarding 
  reducing barriers to secondary markets for spectrum rights. See,
  
  notice in the Federal Register, December 27, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 247, at 
  Pages 77560 - 77568. This 2FNPRM is a part of a larger item that the FCC 
  adopted on July 8, 2004, and released on September 2, 2004. See, story titled 
  "FCC Adopts Second Secondary Markets Report and Order" in
  TLJ Daily E-Mail 
  Alert No. 934, July 9, 2004; and story titled "FCC Releases Second 
  Secondary Markets Report and Order" in
  TLJ Daily E-Mail 
  Alert No. 969, September 3, 2004. See also, story titled "FCC Sets Comment 
  Deadlines on 2FNPRM Regarding Secondary Markets for Spectrum" in TLJ Daily 
  E-Mail Alert No. 1,045, December 28, 2004. 
                Deadline to submit reply comments to the
  Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 
  regarding Qualcomm's Petition for Declaratory 
  Ruling seeking clarification of rules and the establishment of a streamlined review 
  process to accelerate the deployment of new services in the 700 MHz band. See, FCC
  
  Public Notice (DA 05-87). This proceeding is WT Docket No. 05-7. 
                 | 
                 
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Friday, February 18 | 
               
              
                | 
                 12:00 NOON. Glynn Lunney (Tulane University 
  Law School) will give a lecture titled "Direct and Indirect Stock Price 
  Reactions to Patent Decisions" as part of the
  Georgetown Law 
  Colloquium on Intellectual Property & Technology Law. For more 
  information, contact Julie Cohen at 202 662-9871 or 
  jec at law dot georgetown dot edu, or Jay 
  Thomas at 202 662-9925. Location: Faculty Lounge, Fifth Floor, 
  Georgetown University Law Center, 600 New Jersey Ave., NW. 
                Deadline to submit reply comments to the
  Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 
  regarding reserve prices or minimum opening bids and other procedures for Auction 
  60, the auction of five licenses in the Lower 700 MHz band C block 
  (710-716/740-746 MHz), which is scheduled to begin on July 20, 2005. See, FCC's
  
  Public Notice numbered DA 05-171. 
                Deadline to submit initial comments to the
  Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 
  regarding reserve prices or minimum opening bids and other procedures for Auction 
  61, the auction of of ten Automated Maritime Telecommunications System 
  (AMTS) licenses scheduled to commence on August 3, 2005. See, 
  notice in the 
  Federal Register, February 11, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 28, at Pages 7270-7274. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          | 
            
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Tuesday, February 22 | 
               
              
                | 
                 The Supreme Court return from a recess that began on January 24, 2005. 
                9:30 AM. The U.S. Court of 
  Appeals (DCCir) will hear oral argument in American Library 
  Association v. FCC, No. 04-1037. The is a petition for review of the
  Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) 
  broadcast flag order. See,
  
  Report and Order Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking [72 pages in PDF]. 
  This item is FCC 03-273 in MB Docket 02-230. See also,
  story 
  titled "FCC Releases Broadcast Flag Rule" in
  TLJ Daily E-Mail 
  Alert No. 772, November 5, 2003. The petitioners are the
  American Library Association (ALA), 
  Association of Research Libraries, 
  American Association of Law Libraries, 
  Medical Library Association, Special Libraries Association,
  Consumer Federation of America 
  (CFA), Consumers Union, and 
  Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). 
  Public Knowledge and the law firm of 
  Steptoe and Johnson represent petitioners. See, petitioners'
  
  brief [63 pages in PDF]. Judges Edwards, Sentelle and Rogers will preside. 
  Location: Prettyman Courthouse, 333 Constitution Ave., NW. 
                10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The Department of State's 
  International 
  Telecommunication Advisory Committee (ITAC) will meet to prepare for the 
  Organization of American States' (OAS)
  Inter-American 
  Telecommunication Commission's (CITEL) Permanent Consultative Committee II 
  meeting in Guatemala to be held in April 2005. See,
  
  notice in the Federal Register, December 30, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 250, at 
  Pages 78515-78516. For more information, including the location, contact 
  Cecily Holiday at
  holidaycc@state.gov or Anne Jillson 
  at jillsonad@state.gov. Location: 
  undisclosed. 
                12:15 - 2:00 PM. The Federal Communications 
  Bar Association's (FCBA) Online Communications Committee will host a brown bag 
  lunch. Jeffrey Carlisle (Co-Director of the FCC's 
  Internet Policy Working Group and Chief of the 
  FCC's Wireline Competition Bureau) will give an 
  address on voice over internet protocol issues titled "Fear and Loathing 
  in The Voice Markets". RSVP to Wendy Parish 
  wendy@fcba.org. Location: 
  Davis Wright Tremaine, 1500 K Street, NW, Suite 450. 
                6:00 - 8:45 PM. The DC Bar Association 
  will host a continuing legal education (CLE) program titled "Using Section 
  337 Proceedings for Effective Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights at the 
  Border". The speakers will be Wayne Herrington 
  (International Trade Commission),
  
  Sturgis Sobin (Miller & Chevalier),
  Cindy Weber (Sughrue Mion), and Aoi Nawashiro 
  (Browdy & Neimark). See, 
  
  notice. Prices vary from $70 to $115. For more information, call 202 
  626-3488. Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H St., NW. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Wednesday, February 23 | 
               
              
                | 
                 10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The Advisory Committee for the 2007 World 
  Radiocommunication Conference will meet. See, FCC
  
  notice [PDF] and
  
  notice in the Federal Register, January 3, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 1, at Page 
  87. Location: Federal Communications Commission 
  (FCC), Commission Meeting Room (TW-C305), 445 12th St., SW. 
                11:30 AM - 1:45 PM. The Federal 
  Communications Bar Association (FCBA) will host a continuing legal education (CLE) 
  seminar titled "Wireless Broadband Issues & Hot Topics". The speakers 
  will include Lauren Van Wazer and John Branscome (Co-Chairs of the FCC's 
  Broadband Wireless Access Task Force), Carolyn 
  Brandon (VP Policy, CTIA), Andrew Krieg (President of 
  Wireless Communications Association International), 
  Rebecca Arbogast (Legg Mason), David Furth 
  (Associate Chief of the FCC's Wireless Telecommunications 
  Bureau), Paul 
  Sinderbrand (Wilkinson Barker & Knauer), 
  Donald Evans 
  (Fletcher Heald & Hildreth), Todd Gray (Dow Lohnes & Albertson). Lunch will be 
  served. For more information, contact Adam Krinksy at 202 383-3340. See,
  registration form 
  [PDF]. Prices to attend range from $65 to $140. Location:
  Sidley Austin, 1501 K Street, NW, 6th 
  Floor. 
                12:00 - 1:30 PM. The DC Bar Association 
  will host an event titled "Protecting Consumers in the 21st Century: Law 
  Enforcement at the Federal Trade Commission". The speaker will be Deborah 
  Majoras, Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission 
  (FTC). The price to attends ranges from $10 to $20. For more information, call 202 
  626-3463. See,  
  notice. Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H 
  St., NW. 
                Day one of a two day meeting of the 
  Homeland Security Science 
  and Technology Advisory Committee (HSSTAC). This meeting is closed to the public. See,
  
  notice in the Federal Register, January 31, 2005, Vol. 70, No. 19, at Page 4881. 
  Location: Booz Allen Hamilton, Virginia Square Plaza, 3811 Fairfax Drive, 
  Arlington, VA. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
       
     |