| 107th Congress | 
               
              
                1/11. Rep. Fred
                  Upton (R-MI) will be the new Chairman of the Telecom
                  Subcommittee of the House
                  Commerce Committee. Much of the technology related
                  legislation in the House must pass through this subcommittee.
                   
                  1/11. Senate
                  Commerce Committee announced its membership for the
                  107th Congress. It has jurisdiction over many high tech
                  related items. Newly appointed members are Barbara Boxer
                  (D-CA), John Edwards (D-SC), and Jean Carnahan (D-MO), Gordon
                  Smith (R-OR), Peter Fitzgerald (R-IL), John Ensign (R-NV), and
                  George Allen (R-VA). The returning members are Ernest
                  Hollings (D-SC), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Jay Rockefeller (D-WV),
                  John Kerry (D-MA), John Breaux (D-LA), Byron Dorgan (D-ND),
                  Ron Wyden (D-OR), Max Cleland (D-GA), John McCain (R-AZ), Ted
                  Stevens (R-AK), Conrad Burns (R-MT), Trent Lott (R-MI), Kay
                  Hutchison, (R-TX), Olympia Snowe (R-ME), and Sam Brownback
                  (R-KS). Departing members include Bill Frist (R-TN),
                  who left to take another committee assignment, Slade Gorton
                  (R-WA), whose lost his re-election bid, and John Ashcroft
                  (R-MO), who lost his bid for re-election, and is now President
                  Elect Bush's nominee to be Attorney General. McCain will be
                  Committee Chairman; Hollings will be the Ranking Minority
                  Member; and Burns will be Chairman of the Communications
                  Subcommittee. See, release.
                   
                  1/11. Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA) has been appointed to the Senate Judiciary
                  Committee. She is a former Real Networks
                  executive who now represents Microsoft's home state. Sen. Orrin Hatch
                  (R-UT), who will become Chairman after Jan. 20, strongly
                  supports the government's antitrust action against Microsoft.
                  In addition to antitrust matters, the Committee has
                  jurisdiction over immigration (including H1B visas) and crime.
                   
                  1/11. Sen. Hillary
                  Clinton (D-NY) was appointed to three committees without
                  any significant jurisdiction over technology related issues:
                  Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee; Budget; and
                  Environment and Public Works. (The HELP Committee does have
                  some authority over medical privacy issues.) | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Va. Computer Crimes Act | 
               
              
                | 1/3. The Free
                  Republic filed a complaint in the
                  Circuit Court of Fairfax County Virginia against  
                  Thomas Chappell Aldridge alleging violation of the Virginia
                  Computer Crimes Act in connection with his hostile
                  postings to a discussion group web site. The Free Republic is
                  a not for profit California corporation which operates a
                  discussion web site for political conservatives and
                  libertarians. It recently lost a copyright infringement
                  lawsuit brought in U.S. District Court (CDCal)
                  titled LA
                  Times v. Free Republic for publishing complete verbatim
                  copies of thousands of news stories from the LA Times and
                  Washington Post. Aldridge, an attorney in Northern Virginia,
                  is a cantakerous writer and flamer who has earned the enmity
                  of Free Republic members for his unorthodox commentary, his
                  ability to assume a multitude of pseudonymous identities, and
                  his skill at evading technological efforts to prevent him from
                  posting. He also supplied an affidavit in the copyright
                  infringement action that the Court relied upon in finding
                  infringement. The complaint against Aldridge pleads six causes
                  of action. Counts 1-4 are based upon the recently enacted
                  Virginia Computer Crimes Act. Count 1 alleges computer
                  trespass. Count 2 alleges theft of computer services. Count 3
                  alleges harassment by computer. Count 4 alleges injury from
                  unsolicited bulk electronic mail. Count 5 alleges civil
                  conspiracy under Virginia law. Count 6 alleges break of
                  contract (i.e., the web site user agreement). Plaintiff seeks
                  monetary damages and an injunction against posting
                  unauthorized messages on its web site. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | New Documents | 
               
              
                FCC: summary
                  of AOL Time Warner merger conditions, 1/11 (PDF, FCC).
                   
                  USCA:
                  Opinion
                  in Lone Star Ladies v. Schlotsky's re PSLRA, 1/11 (HTML, USCA).
                   
                  Milberg:
                  complaint
                  against VA Linux under federal securities laws, 1/11 (PDF,
                  Milberg). | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          | 
            
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | AOL Time Warner Merger | 
               
              
                1/11. The FCC approved
                  the merger of AOL and Time Warner with conditions. This
                  FCC proceeding is nominally a license transfer proceeding; the
                  parties applied for radios licenses held by Time Warner to be
                  transferred to the merged entity. However, the proceeding is
                  in the nature of an antitrust merger review, redundant of the
                  review already completed by the FTC,
                  an agency that has statutory authority to conduct antitrust
                  merger reviews. Moreover, the antitrust analysis conducted by
                  the FCC concerned Internet operations, not the radio licenses.
                  The decision was expected. The FCC almost never rejects
                  license transfer requests. Rather, it often withholds its
                  approval of license transfers until it extracts the
                  concessions from the parties that it seeks. The numerous
                  concessions in the matter mostly regulate Internet operations
                  of AOL Time Warner for for which the FCC does not issue
                  licenses: instant messaging (IM), interactive TV, and
                  broadband Internet access over cable facilities. While the FCC
                  has released its own summary
                  [PDF] of its Order approving the merger, a press
                  release, and statements by each of the five Commissioners,
                  it has not released the most important document -- the Order
                  itself.
                   
                  1/11. The FCC imposed several significant conditions upon
                  its approval of the merger of AOL and Time Warner. AOL
                  Time Warner (AOL) shall not restrict the ability of any
                  current or prospective ISP customers to select and initiate
                  service from any unaffiliated ISP which, pursuant to a
                  contract with AOL, has made its service available over AOL's
                  cable facilities. AOL must permit each ISP to have a direct
                  billing arrangement with those high-speed Internet access
                  subscribers to whom the ISP sells service. AOL's instant
                  messaging (IM) services must interoperate with competing IM
                  providers before it can offer videoconferencing and other
                  streaming video over IM. The FCC's Cable Services Bureau will
                  have continuing oversight authority over the merged company.
                   
                  1/11. All five FCC Commissioners voted to approve the AOL
                  Time Warner merger, but released separate statements.
                  Chairman Kennard
                  wrote a statement
                  summarizing and defending the FCC's action. He concluded:
                  "With the merger of AOL and Time Warner, we are seeing
                  the creation of a new platform for communications based on the
                  Internet. Our challenge is to make sure that consumers get the
                  full benefits of this new world technology without importing
                  the dangers of monopoly and bottlenecks from the old world. We
                  have met this challenge." Tristani
                  wrote in her statement
                  that she would have taken an even more regulatory approach.
                  She stated that she had "advocated for even more forceful
                  conditions aimed at achieving interoperability" of IM. Furchtgott-Roth
                  wrote in his dissent
                  that the FCC has no legal authority to conduct antitrust
                  merger reviews; hence, he approved of the merger, but
                  dissented from the imposition of conditions. Powell,
                  who is rumored to be President Elect Bush's likely choice to
                  be the next FCC Chairman, wrote the most detailed and reasoned
                  opinion.
                  He stated that "the record and the anticompetitive theory
                  did not support mandating interoperability" of IM. Ness
                  wrote in a brief comment,
                  "You've Got Approval!" | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | More News Briefs | 
               
              
                1/11. President Elect George Bush announced that Robert
                  Zoellick will be new U.S.
                  Trade Representative. He previously worked in the Bush Sr.
                  administration as Deputy Chief of Staff and Under Secretary of
                  State for Economics. He also worked at Treasury Dept. during
                  the Reagan administration. He worked under James Baker. See, State
                  Dept. release. Outgoing USTR Charlene Barshefsky praised
                  Zoellick in a release.
                   
                  1/11. Govworks.com
                  filed a petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in U.S.
                  Bankruptcy Court (SDNY).
                   
                  1/11. James Toupin has been named General Counsel of
                  the USPTO,
                  effective Jan. 28, 2001. He is a former Deputy General Counsel
                  at the USITC.
                  He also was Assistant General Counsel for Litigation and
                  Special Projects at the USITC from 1987 to1994. He previously
                  worked at the law firm of  Memel Jacobs from 1985 to1987,
                  and at Covington & Burling from 1978 to1985. Bernard
                  Knight has been named Deputy General Counsel for General
                  Law of the USPTO. He was previously a Senior Trial Attorney at
                  the Department of Justice. John Whealan has been named
                  Deputy General Counsel for Intellectual Property Law and
                  Solicitor. See, release.
                   
                  1/11. The NTIA
                  will host a government - industry meeting on Third
                  Generation (3G) wireless services on January 17, 2001. The
                  meeting will be held from 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM in the Polaris
                  Room of the Ronald Reagan Building (Concourse Level), 1300
                  Pennsylvania Ave.
                   
                  1/11. ICANN
                  published information
                  about its next round of meetings, to be held in Melbourne,
                  Australia, on March 10-13.
                   
                  1/11. The National
                  Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)
                  published a notice
                  in Federal Register regarding Technology Opportunity Program
                  (TOP) grants. The NTIA will award $42.5 Million in grants in
                  FY 2001, up from $12 Million in FY 2000. These grants go to
                  state, local, and tribal governments, colleges and
                  universities, and non-profit entities to extend advanced
                  telecommunications technologies to inaccessible, rural and
                  underserved urban communities. See also, NTIA
                  release. The NTIa will host a series of workshops around
                  the country to assist grant applicants. See, NTIA's online
                  registration page.
                   
                  1/11. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (FedCir) heard oral argument in Octel v. Theis.
                  This is an appeal from a final judgment of the U.S. District
                  Court (NDCal)
                  in a patent infringement case. The trial court
                  dismissed on the grounds of res judicata. The court had
                  previously adjudged the patent in suit invalid, the Federal
                  Circuit had affirmed, and the Supreme Court had denied
                  certiorari. But, appellant thinks the original Patent Office
                  determination should carry more weight. The patent concerns
                  voice processing services, such as voice mail. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Today | 
               
              
                1/12. Appeal Briefs are due to filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals (DCCir)
                  from the Department of Justice,
                  the states, and amici in support of the government, in the Microsoft
                  antitrust case. See, scheduling order
                  [PDF].
                   
                  1/12. Sixty small technology companies and the Association for
                  Competitive Technology (ACT) wrote an Open
                  Letter to the 107th Congress and Bush administration
                  regarding the Microsoft antitrust case. They stated:
                  "We're deeply troubled by the potential legacy of the
                  outgoing Justice Department, which could undermine our
                  industry’s future and threaten our nation’s recent
                  economic success. ... Misguided application of antitrust laws,
                  such as the case against Microsoft, ignores the realities of
                  our industry and could create disastrous new rules to govern
                  competitive behavior in the 'new economy.' " the group
                  also published the letter as an advertisement
                  [PDF] in the paper versions of the Washington Post and Wall
                  Street Journal. See also, ACT release. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Securities Litigation | 
               
              
                1/11. The U.S. Court
                  of Appeals (5thCir) issued its opinion
                  in Lone
                  Star Ladies v. Schlotsky's reversing the trial
                  court's dismissal of a class action securities
                  complaint for failure to comply with the heightened pleading
                  requirements of the Private
                  Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA). This is not
                  a technology case. Schlotsky's is a restaurant chain. But, the
                  PSLRA was enacted by the Congress in large part to limit
                  frivolous federal class action securities suits against
                  technology companies. Plaintiffs sued Schlostky's and several
                  of its officers and directors alleging violations of federal
                  securities laws, and sought class action status. The U.S.
                  District Court (WDTex)
                  granted defendants' 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to
                  pleaded facts sufficient to give rise to a strong inference of
                  scienter as required by the PSLRA. The trial court denied
                  plaintiffs' motions to amend complaint, and dismissed with
                  prejudice. Reversed and remanded.
                   
                  1/11. An individual named Alexander Markaron filed a complaint
                  [PDF] in U.S. District Court (SDNY)
                  against VA Linux, two of its officers
                  and directors, and Credit Suisse First
                  Boston alleging violations of federal securities laws. The
                  plaintiff, who is represented by the law firm of Milberg Weiss,
                  seeks class action status. Count one alleges violation of
                  § 11 of the Securities Act by VA Linux. Count two
                  alleges violation of § 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act by
                  Credit Suisse. Count three alleges controlling person
                  liability for violation of § 15 of the Securities Act by
                  the officers and directors. Count four alleges § 10b and
                  Rule 10b-5 fraud by Credit Suisse. VA Linux provides Linux
                  based software and support services for ASPs, e-commerce
                  companies, and ISPs. Credit Suisse was the lead underwriter in
                  an initial public offering (IPO) of VA Linux shares in
                  December of 1999. Milberg Weiss is a law firm that specializes
                  in bringing class action securities suits against technology
                  companies when their stock prices drop.  | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal is a free access web site
                  and e-mail alert that provides news, records, and analysis of
                  legislation, litigation, and regulation affecting the computer
                  and Internet industry. 
                   
                  This e-mail service is offered free of charge to anyone who
                  requests it. Just provide TLJ an e-mail address. 
                   
                  Number of subscribers (as of Jan. 11): 556. 
                   
                  Contact TLJ: 
                  202-364-8882. 
                  E-mail. 
                  P.O. Box 15186, Washington DC, 20003. 
                   
                  Privacy
                  Policy 
                   
                  Notices
                  & Disclaimers 
                   
                  Copyright 1998 - 2000 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     |