Computer Firms and RBOCs Write FCC with High Speed Internet Access Proposals

(December 8, 1998)  Several leading computer companies and most of the regional Bell operating companies jointly wrote to the Federal Communications Commission on Monday, December 7, with a set of proposals for facilitating the provision of high speed Internet access via ADSL technology.

Related Documents

Letter to FCC, 12/7/98.
Ten Principles, 12/7/98.
BellSouth Press Release, 12/7/98.

The problem with providing high speed Internet access to most users lies in the low bandwidth of local telephone lines.  The letter to the FCC offers as a solution the use of ADSL technology, and proposes that to facilitate its widespread deployment, the incumbent local phone companies should open their central offices to the competitive local phone companies, and that ISPs be allowed access to broadband networks on a non-discriminatory basis.  In return, it is proposed that the FCC lessen certain regulatory restraints.

The letter to the FCC stated that there is a problem in local loop in providing high speed Internet access.  The letter stated:

... the capabilities of the nation's telecommunications networks -- particularly our local networks -- are not keeping pace with user needs for faster, more reliable access to the Internet.  Unless steps are taken to rectify this problem, growth of the Internet, and the wealth of new service applications that the Internet promises to create will be needlessly foreclosed."

The letter included an attachment listing "Ten Principles for the Promotion of Widespread Deployment of Advanced Services."  The list includes provisions for the promotion of competition in the local exchange data communications market, including:

What the Letters Mean

ADSL.  Acronym for "Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line."  A set of developing technologies and equipment that can use existing unshielded twisted pair copper wires from the phone company's central office to the end user's home or business to transfer data at rates much faster than with the prevalent 28.8 and 56 Kbps computer modems.  It utilizes ADSL modems at both the central office and at the subscriber's premises to send digital signals at high speeds, typically measured in Mbps.  It is asymmetric in the sense that more data is sent in the downstream direction than upstream.   It enables the local loop to be used for fast Internet access, including such services as video on demand, video conferencing, work at home access to corporate LANs, operation of small business web servers, multiparty games, remote medical diagnosis, and webcasting.
G.Lite ADSL.  One GTE ADSL standard, which is currently being tested in Portland, Oregon, which specifies transmission speeds up to 1.5 megabits per second (Mbps) downstream and 512 kilobits per second (kbps) upstream. GTE, Intel, Fujitsu Network Communications and Orckit Communications are jointly conducting the trial.   The International Telecommunications Union recently adopted this standard.
LEC.  Local Exchange Carrier.  A local phone company, such as a BOC (Bell Operating Company) or an independent (such as GTE).  Since deregulation in 1996, there have been two types of LECs:  ILEC (Incumbent Local Exchange Carrier) and CLEC (Competitive Local Exchange Carrier).
CLEC.  Competitive Local Exchange Carrier.  A class of company created by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 which competes on a selective basis to provide local telephone, and other, services.
ISP.  Internet Service Provider.

In return, the "Ten Principles" calls on the FCC to lessen regulation.   In particular, it provides that "The FCC shall grant liberal waivers of requests for changes in interLATA boundaries for data services ..."

The computer companies which joined in the letter are Compaq, Gateway, Intel, and Microsoft.   The RBOC signatories are BellSouth, Bell Atlantic, SBC, and U.S. WestGTE, which is the local telephone company in many areas, and in the process of merging with SBC, also signed.  Finally, the Business Software Alliance and the Information Technology Industry Council signed the letter.

No competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs) signed.  Nor did interexchange carriers (IXCs) AT&T, MCI Worldcom, or Sprint join in the letter.  AT&T is in the process of acquiring cable company TCI, and hopes to become a leading provider of Internet access via competing cable technology.  Also, RBOC Ameritech did not join in the letter.  Leading computer company Dell did not sign either.

The letter was addressed to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which is charged under Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of the 1996 with encouraging,

"the deployment on a reasonable and timely basis of advanced telecommunications capability to all Americans (including, in particular, elementary and secondary schools and classrooms) by utilizing, in a manner consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity, price cap regulation, regulatory forbearance, measures that promote competition in the local telecommunications market, or other regulating methods that remove barriers to infrastructure investment."

"Today's announcement marks a significant win for consumers," said Rod Schrock, a SVP at Compaq in a press release. "Our customers tell us they are clamoring for faster Internet connections. This proposal will ultimately give consumers the fastest Internet experience possible by accelerating deployment of high-speed ADSL Internet access."

"This agreement represents another significant step towards Intel's goal of widespread deployment of affordable broadband services," said Les Vadasz, SVP for Corporate Business Development at Intel. "Recently, a cross industry effort successfully defined and delivered a global, low cost, consumer-friendly ADSL standard, known as G.Lite (G.992.2). Today's agreement on these principles should provide a catalyst for the adoption of regulatory policies that will both foster the efforts of the new competitors and strengthen the local telephone companies' investment incentives to offer G.Lite and other broadband services."

FCC Chairman William Kennard issued the following response on Monday:

"While I have not seen the specific proposal from the companies, I applaud any efforts to give all Americans greater access to modern telecommunications services as inexpensively as possible. That's what the Communications Act and our rules are all about. Once the plan is filed with us, we will examine it fully to make sure it serves the public and is consistent with the law as established by Congress."

 

MCI WORLDCOM RESPONSE

MCI WorldCom released the following statement of Jonathan Sallet, MCI WorldCom Chief Policy Counsel, on Monday:
"In this holiday season, consumers should beware of ILECs bearing 'gifts' - in this case, a typical monopoly ploy to extend bottleneck control of voice services to the Internet. In exchange for 'promising' to do some of what the Telecom Act already requires them to do, these phone monopolies ask that they be excused from complying with many of the law's other pro-competitive requirements. Once excused, they then 'promise' to upgrade their facilities and open the local loop to competition and innovation. But promises are the only thing the Bells and GTE have ever rolled out. These are the same monopolies that promised, but failed to deliver, ISDN, fiber to the home and video dial tone."
"The real crisis today is bottleneck control of the local loop. This proposed cozy inside deal would do nothing more than allow the RBOCs and GTE to build a digital monopoly by closing down competitors' access to the local loop.  We urge the FCC to reject this unlawful, disingenuous and dangerous plan."