|Bush Signs Bill Extending R&D Tax
12/20. President Bush signed
HR 6111, the
"Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006". This bill expands, and briefly extends,
but does not make permanent, the research and development (R&D) tax credit.
See, story titled "Congress Extends R&D Tax Credit" in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,504, December 13, 2006.
President Bush spoke at a signing ceremony in the Eisenhower Building,
adjacent to the White House. He said that "to keep our nation leading the world
in technology and innovation, we're extending and modernizing the research and
development tax credit. By allowing businesses to deduct part of their R&D
investments from their taxes, this bill will continue to encourage American
companies to pursue innovative products, medicines, and technologies."
The R&D Credit Coalition stated
in a release that it "will continue to work to make this strengthened R&D tax
credit a permanent part of the tax code so that businesses will be able to plan and invest
in U.S.-based R&D with certainty well into the future."
The R&D tax credit now extends until December 31, 2007. Congress and the President
continuously extend this credit. This facilitates the use of fiscal smoke and mirrors.
Companies have the credit in the short run, and a reasonable expectation that it will be
extended in the long run. However, the Congress and President can continuously make revenue
and deficit projections based upon the fictitious assumption that tax revenues will
increase as soon as the current credit expires.
These short extensions also keep many large corporations in a perpetual state
of solicitude towards the Congress and the President, a status which many
political actors find useful for fundraising and other political purposes.
|1st Circuit Addresses Copyright
12/15. The U.S. Court of Appeals (1stCir)
in Santa Rosa v. Combo Records, a music recording contract rescission case
involving Copyright Act preemption. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the
District Court, which dismissed a musician's complaint against his record
company. The Court of Appeals held that
a claim to rescind a music recording contract is preempted by the Copyright Act. It did
not address whether an action to collect damages would be preempted.
Gilberto Santa Rosa [Amazon] is a salsa singer and band leader. Combo Records
is a record production company that produced and distributed several music
albums of songs sung by Santa Rosa from 1986 through 1989.
Santa Rosa filed a complaint in 2004 in U.S. District Court (DPR) against
Combo and others seeking rescission of a contract based on material breach,
damages for unjust enrichment, a declaratory judgment of ownership of the
recordings, and a declaratory judgment of violation of the Lanham Act. The
District Court dismissed the complaint with prejudice.
Santa Rosa brought the present appeal. The Court of Appeals held that the
claim for rescission is preempted by the Copyright Act.
17 U.S.C. § 301(a) provides, in part, that "all legal or equitable rights
that are equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of
copyright ... are governed exclusively by this title. Thereafter, no person is
entitled to any such right or equivalent right in any such work under the common
law or statutes of any State."
The Court of Appeals reasoned that "Because Santa Rosa seeks rescission of
his contract, if we were to grant him the relief that he sought, we would be
required to determine his ownership rights by reference to the Copyright Act."
The Court of Appeals, relying on Data Gen. Corp. v. Grumman Sys. Support Corp.,
36 F.3d 1147 (1st Cir. 1994), continued that "In such a case, there is little
question that we would be merely determining whether Santa Rosa was entitled to
compensation because of "mere copying" or "performance, distribution
or display" of his recordings."
It concluded, therefore, that Section 301 "preempts Santa Rosa's rescission
claim. Once it is determined that Santa Rosa's rescission claim is preempted,
his only remedy is a claim under the Copyright Act ..."
The Court of Appeals then held that Santa Rosa's claim under the Copyright
Act is barred by limitation.
17 U.S.C. § 507(b) provides that "No civil action shall be maintained under
the provisions of this title unless it is commenced within three years after the
The Court of Appeals wrote that a claim for declaratory judgment of ownership
accrues when the plaintiff knew of the alleged grounds for the ownership claim,
which in the present case was "as soon as he finished recording each album".
This was more than three years before the filing of the complaint.
This case is Gilberto Santa Rosa v. Combo Records, et al., U.S. Court
of Appeals for the 1st Circuit, App. Ct. No.05-2237, an appeal from the U.S.
District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, Judge Jay García-Gregory
presiding. Judge Torruella issued the opinion of the Court of Appeals, in which
Judges Baldock and Stahl joined.
|1st Circuit Addresses Probative and
Substantial Similarity in Copyright Infringement Case
12/15. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(1stCir) issued its
opinion in Quaglia v. Bravo Networks, a copyright
infringement case involving television programs. The Court of Appeals affirmed
the summary judgment of the District Court for the defendant. The key section of
the opinion addresses probative and substantial similarity.
Frank Quaglia is the creator and copyright holder of the film titled "The
Ultimate Audition". The Bravo Network and others
made a series of television programs titled "The It Factor".
Quaglia filed a complaint in U.S. District Court
(DMass) against Bravo and others alleging copyright infringement, breach of
confidentiality and breach of implied contract. The District Court granted summary judgment
to the Bravo Network.
The Court of Appeals affirmed. It wrote that to prevail on a claim of copyright
infringement, a plaintiff must demonstrate ownership of a valid copyright, and copying
of constituent elements of the work that are original. The parties did not dispute
Quaglia's copyright ownership. However, copying was at issue.
The Court of Appeals stated that "Since there is usually no evidence of
actual copying, a plaintiff may prove that wrongful copying occurred by showing
that defendants had access to the copyrighted work and that the allegedly
infringing work has ``probative similarity´´ to the copyrighted work."
The Court of Appeals continued that probative similarity exists where two works are
"so similar that the court may infer that there was factual copying." Then,
the plaintiff must prove that the copying of the copyrighted work was so extensive that
it rendered the infringing and copyrighted works substantially similar.
The Court of Appeals concluded that "Quaglia's claim fails on the issue of
probative and substantial similarity. After viewing both works, we conclude
that, essentially for the reasons stated by the district court in its March 21,
2006, opinion, no reasonable juror could find substantial similarity of
expression, even taking the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff.
To the extent that there are similarities, many of them relate to stock
characters and scènes à faire, which are not subject to copyright protection."
The Court of Appeals held that it was appropriate to grant summary judgment. It also
affirmed the summary judgment as to the remaining issues, with little discussion.
This case is Frank Quaglia v. Bravo Networks, et al., U.S. Court of Appeals for
the 1st Circuit, App. Ct. No. 06-1864, an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the
District of Massachusetts, Judge Rya Zobel presiding. The Court of Appeals issued a per
curiam opinion by Judges Torruella, Selya and Howard.
|People and Appointments
12/20. Howard Waltzman will join the law firm of
Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw. He is currently
chief counsel of the House Commerce
Committee's (HCC) Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet. Before joining
the HCC, he was general counsel to Sen. Sam
Brownback (R-KS). The HCC stated in a release that Waltzman "authored numerous
communications laws, including the Auction Reform Act, the Commercial Spectrum Enhancement
Act and the Digital Television Transition and Public Safety Act" and that he
"was also the architect of Energy and Commerce Committee's recent telecommunications
reform legislation, the Communications Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement
Act", which was approved by the House, but not the Senate.
12/20. The Copyright Office published a
notice in the Federal Register announcing receipt of a notice of intent to audit 2005
statements of account concerning the eligible nonsubscription transmissions of sound
recordings made by Beethoven.com under statutory
licenses. See, Federal Register, December 20, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 244, at Pages
12/20. A grand jury of the U.S. District Court
(SDFl) returned a ten count indictment that charges Christian Sapsizian, a former
Alcatel CIT executive, with, among other things, conspiring to make over $2.5 Million in
bribe payments to officials of the government of Costa Rica to obtain a telecommunications
contract, in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which is codified at
15 U.S.C. § 78dd-1. See, Department of Justice (DOJ)
12/13. The Progress and Freedom Foundation (PFF)
titled "Solutions for Software Patents: Notes From Under My Desk". The author is
the PFF's Solveig Singleton.
|DHS Officials Defend Automated
Stewart Baker, the Department of Homeland
Security's (DHS) Assistant Secretary for Policy, gave a
Washington DC on December 19, 2006, in which he defended the DHS's program
titled "Automated Targeting System", or "ATS".
He said that the ATS has the "capacity to find hidden links".
Baker said that "the border is our last, best chance to identify and turn
away terrorists. Once they're in the country, they're much harder to find and
much harder to stop. We need the best possible information on the hundreds of
millions of people who cross the border every year. ATS helps us marshal that
information. It helps us protect Americans from terrorism".
He did not disclose new details about the program. He described an ATS program that
is narrower than the same ATS program described by the DHS in a recent Privacy Act
notice in the Federal Register. See, Federal Register, November 2, 2006,
Vol. 71, No. 212, at Pages 64543-64546, and story titled "DHS Discloses Some
Details of Electronic Database of Personal Information" in TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 1,497, December 1, 2006.
Baker stated that "There are calls to abolish it or restrict how DHS uses it.
Those calls are wrong".
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), who will become
Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee in the 110th Congress, has spoken harsh words
about the ATS. He said at a hearing on December 7, 2006, that the Bush administration
"has been compiling secret dossiers on millions of unwitting, law-abiding Americans
who travel across our borders".
Sen. Leahy added that "It is simply incredible that the Administration is willing
to share this sensitive information with foreign governments and even private employers,
while refusing to allow U.S. citizens to see or challenge the so-called terror score that
the government has assigned them based on their travel habits and schedules." See,
story titled "FBI Director Mueller Testifies Before Senate Judiciary Committee"
in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,500, December 7, 2006.
See also, Cato Institute paper
[12 pages in PDF] titled "Effective Counterterrorism and the Limited Role of Predictive
Data Mining", and story titled "Cato Paper Criticizes Use of Predictive Data
Mining to Fight Terrorism" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,503, December 12, 2006.
Baker began his speech by stating that a person who later proved to be a
terrorist was denied entry to the US at Chicago O'Hare Airport because "data in
the DHS computer system flagged him as someone who ought to get a bit more
scrutiny than the usual passenger".
He also offered a cursory explanation of the program: "Here's how it works.
When people buy plane tickets, they give the airline some information -- names,
passport numbers, frequent-flyer numbers, credit cards, and so on. DHS collects
this information from the airlines and uses ATS to do screening for dangerous
people. ATS runs the travelers' names against lists of known or suspected
terrorists. It can also do a quick link analysis, looking for travelers who gave
the airline a phone number that's also used by a known terrorist."
Baker also argued that "ATS does not pose a threat to privacy. First, ATS is
not exactly a dossier of our most intimate secrets. It contains travel
reservation data -- flight numbers and destinations and traveling companions.
Travelers have already chosen to give it to" their airline.
Baker also said that the 9/11 Commission recommended this program, and that
the Congress has been appropriating funds for it.
In addition, Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security, gave a
December 14, 2006, in which he touched on this program, among other topics.
He said that "Having the ability to collect and analyze this kind of targeting
information was one of the principal recommendations of the 9/11 Commission".
"Now, of late, people have seemed to take notice of this". Chertoff continued
that "they've raised concerns that somehow by looking at things like the credit
card used to buy a ticket, or the contact number, that were violating privacy
laws, or were violating constitutional rights. My answer is, far from it. What
we are doing is a sensible, totally constitutional and privacy right-respecting
effort to make sure that we don't inconvenience the rights of most travelers, so
that we can focus more sensibly and in a more risk-managed fashion on those
people that do potentially pose a threat."
|Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red.
|Wednesday, December 20
The House and Senate will next meet at 12:00 NOON on Tuesday,
January 4, 2007. See,
RESCHEDULED FROM DECEMBER 14. 9:30 AM. The
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will hold a
agenda [PDF]. The event will be webcast by the FCC.
Location: FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C05 (Commission Meeting Room).
Deadline to submit initial comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding the petition for declaratory ruling
filed by One Stop Financial, Inc., Group Discounts, Inc., 800 Discounts, Inc., and
Winback & Conserve Program, Inc. pertaining to the AT&T tariff at issue, and
"any other issues left open by the D.C. Circuit’s Opinion in AT&T Corp. v.
FCC", 394 F.3d 933. This proceeding is WC Docket No. 06-210. See, FCC
Public Notice [3 pages in PDF] (DA 06-2360).
|Thursday, December 21
10:00 AM. The Federal Communications
Commission's (FCC) Advisory Committee on Diversity for Communications
in the Digital Age will meet. See,
notice in the Federal Register: December 6, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 234, Page
70766. Location: FCC, Room 7-C753, 445 12th St., SW.
EXTENDED TO JANUARY 16.
Extended deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to
its Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) regarding its media ownership
rules. The FCC adopted this FNPRM on July 21, 2006, and released the
pages in PDF] on July 24, 2006. See also, story titled "FCC Adopts FNPRM on
Rules Regulating Ownership of Media" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 1,397, June 22,
2006. This FNPRM is FCC 06-93 in MB Docket No. 02-277, MM Docket No. 01-235, MM Docket No.
01-317, MM Docket No. 00-244, and MB Docket Nos. 06-121. See also, original
notice in the Federal Register, August 9, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 153, at Pages
order [PDF] extending deadlines, and
[PDF] further extending reply comment
|Friday, December 22
11:00 AM - 12:30 PM. The National Science
Board Commission on 21st Century Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics will hold a meeting. See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 20, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 244, at Page
76376. Location: Room 1235, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
Deadline to submit comments to the National
Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) Computer Security Division regarding
Special Publication 800-82 [164 pages in PDF], titled "Guide to Supervisory
Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) and Industrial Control Systems
Deadline to submit reply comments to the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) on the Supporters of the Missoula Plan's proposed interim process to
address phantom traffic issues. See, FCC
Notice [PDF] (DA 06-2294).
5:00 PM. Deadline to submit requests to the Department of Commerce's
(DOC) Bureau of Industry and Security's (BIS)
Deemed Export Advisory Committee (DEAC) to speak at the DEAC's meeting of January
22-23, 2007, in Santa Clara, California. See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 11, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 237, Page
|Tuesday, December 26
Deadline to submit reply comments to the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) regarding the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) request for a
waiver of the FCC's Calling Party Number rules. This proceeding is CC Docket No.
notice in the Federal Register, November 29, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 229, at
|About Tech Law Journal
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Copyright 1998 - 2006 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All