| Bush Issues Executive Order Regarding Health 
Care Information Technology | 
               
              
                | 
 8/22. President Bush issued an
executive order 
titled "Executive Order: Promoting Quality and Efficient Health Care in Federal 
Government Administered or Sponsored Health Care Programs". 
This order states that "It is the purpose of this order to ensure that health care 
programs administered or sponsored by the Federal Government promote quality and efficient 
delivery of health care through the use of health information technology", and other 
things. 
It provides that "As each agency implements, acquires, or upgrades health information 
technology systems used for the direct exchange of health information between agencies and 
with non-Federal entities, it shall utilize, where available, health information technology 
systems and products that meet recognized interoperability standards." 
It further provides that "Each agency shall require in contracts or agreements with 
health care providers, health plans, or health insurance issuers that as each provider, plan, 
or issuer implements, acquires, or upgrades health information technology systems, it shall 
utilize, where available, health information technology systems and products that meet 
recognized interoperability standards." 
Finally, it states that "Agencies shall comply with the requirements of this 
order by January 1, 2007." 
Bush also gave a
speech 
on August 22, 2006, in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in which he discussed his 
executive order. He said that "medicine is really behind the times when it comes 
to information technology. And one of the things we'll talk about here is how to 
use information technology to wring the costs out of medicine, and yet be able 
to deliver good quality care to our citizens." 
He said that "It's estimated that between 25 -- that we can reduce costs by 
25 to 30 percent with the advent of what we call medical -- electric medical 
records, so each person has got their own electronic medical record that you've 
got to add on -- in other words, we'll be passing information from provider to 
provider via the Internet, via new technology as opposed to handwritten files 
that are carried from one office to the other." 
Robert Laurence, President of the Information Technology 
Association of America (ITAA) praised the order. He said in a
release that 
"Standard IT systems spell an end to paper records; interoperable data means 
beneficiaries can understand which plans are of higher quality than others; 
transparency will promote more efficient and effective programs; and ultimately 
commercial providers can follow suit." 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | 1st Circuit Construes Visual Artists Rights 
Act | 
               
              
                | 
 8/22. The U.S. Court of Appeals (1stCir) issued 
its opinion 
in Phillips v. Pembroke Real Estate, a copyright case regarding the Visual 
Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA), which is codified at
17 U.S.C. § 106A. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District 
Court, although on different grounds. The Court of Appeals rejected the legal 
theory that the VARA protects site specific art. 
This case illustrates some of the risks that owners, lessors and purchasers of 
buildings, land, and other real property interests face when their property 
incorporates, or is the location of, works or features that may be construed as 
"visual art" within the meaning of the VARA. Artists might enjoin the owner or 
lessee of the property from freely using and improving the property, on the 
grounds that doing so would impair the rights of the artist. 
David Phillips, a sculpture artist, filed a complaint in the
U.S. District Court (DMass) against 
Pembroke Real Estate, seeking to enjoin Pembroke from moving certain of his 
sculpture works from a public park managed by Pembroke. Phillips alleged 
violation of the VARA and state law. 
Subsection 106A(a) provides, in part, that "the author of a work of visual art ... 
shall have the right ... to prevent any intentional distortion, mutilation, or other 
modification of that work which would be prejudicial to his 
or her honor or reputation, and any intentional distortion, mutilation, or 
modification of that work is a violation of that right, and ... to prevent any 
destruction of a work of recognized stature, and any intentional or grossly 
negligent destruction of that work is a violation of that right." 
Then, Subsection 106A(c) provides, in part, that "The modification of a work of 
visual art which is the result of conservation, or of the public presentation, including 
lighting and placement, of the work is not a destruction, distortion, mutilation, or other 
modification described in subsection (a)(3) unless the modification is caused by gross 
negligence." 
The statute makes no reference to site specific art. 
The District Court held that Phillips' sculptures are "site specific art", 
for which movement of the art is deemed destruction of the art. However, it also 
held that Pembroke could move the works under the "public presentation" 
exception of Subsection 106A(c). 
The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment that Pembroke may move the art. 
However, it did so upon its conclusion that the "plain language of VARA does not 
protect site-specific art". 
This case is David Phillips v. Pembroke Real Estate, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals 
for the 1st Circuit, App. Ct. No. 05-1970, an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the 
District of Massachusetts, Judge Patti Saris presiding. Judge Lipez wrote the opinion of the 
Court of Appeals, in which Judges Cyr and Stahl joined. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          | 
            
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                Washington Tech Calendar 
                New items are highlighted in red. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Wednesday, August 23 | 
               
              
                | 
                 The House will next meet at 2:00 PM on Wednesday, September 6. See, 
  Republican Whip Notice. 
                The Senate will next meet at 11:00 AM on Tuesday, September 5. 
                8:30 AM - 2:30 PM. The
  American Electronics Association (AeA) will host an 
  event titled "AeA Annual Government - Industry Executive Interchange". See,
  notice. 
  Prices to attend range from $195-$295. Location: The Spy Museum, 800 F St., NW. 
                9:30 AM - 4:30 PM. Day one of a two day 
  meeting of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission to 
  consider drafts of material for the 2006 Annual Report. The 
  agenda includes discussion of export controls and China's WTO compliance. See,
  
  notice in the Federal Register, August 16, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 158, at Page 47328. 
  Location: Conference Room 381, Hall of The States, 444 North Capitol St., NW. 
                12:00 NOON - 3:00 PM. The 
  DC Bar Association will host a panel discussion titled 
  "DR-CAFTA: The United States-Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement 
  A Roundtable with the Ambassadors". The speakers will include ambassadors to the 
  U.S. from Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Costa Rica. 
  The price to attend ranges from $15-40. For more information, call 202-626-3488. See,
  notice. 
  Location: Arnold & Porter, 555 12th St., NW. 
                1:30 - 3:30 PM. The Department of State will host a meeting to hear 
  public views on issues related to the possible expansion of the mandate of the 
  International Mobile Satellite Organization (IMSO) to 
  include new oversight and regulatory responsibilities that may affect U.S. and non-U.S. 
  mobile satellite services providers. See,
  
  notice in the Federal Register, August 10, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 154, at 
  Pages 45897-45898. Location: Harry S. Truman building, 2201 C St., NW. 
                CANCELLED. Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
  Auction 
  67 is scheduled to begin. This is the 400 MHz Air-Ground Radiotelephone Service 
  auction. See, FCC
  
  notice of cancellation [PDF] and
  
  notice of cancellation in the Federal Register, May 17, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 95, at 
  Page 28695. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Thursday, August 24 | 
               
              
                | 
                 9:30 AM - 4:30 PM. Day two of a two day 
  meeting of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission to consider drafts 
  of material for the 2006 Annual Report. The agenda includes discussion of export controls 
  and China's WTO compliance. See,
  
  notice in the Federal Register, August 16, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 158, at Page 47328. 
  Location: Conference Room 381, Hall of The States, 444 North Capitol St., NW. 
                 | 
                 
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Friday, August 25 | 
               
              
                | 
                 Deadline to submit comments to the National Institute of Standards and 
  Technology's (NIST) Computer Security Division 
  regarding its 
  draft [159 pages in PDF] of Special Publication 800-53, Revision 1 (Second 
  Public Draft), titled "Recommended Security Controls for Federal Information 
  Systems". 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Monday, August 28 | 
               
              
                | 
                 Deadline to submit comments to the
  Department of Homeland Security (DHS) 
  regarding its proposed rule changes that would amend its
  United States Visitor and Immigrant 
  Status Indicator Technology (US-VISIT) rules to extend US-VISIT 
  requirements to all aliens with the exception of aliens who are specifically 
  exempted and Canadian citizens applying for admission as B1/B2 visitors for 
  business or pleasure. See, notice in the Federal Register, July 27, 2006, Vol. 
  71, No. 144, at Pages 42605-42611. 
                Deadline to submit nominations of individuals for appointment to the
  National Institute of Standards and Technology's 
  (NIST) Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology (VCAT). See,
  
  notice in the Federal Register, August 11, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 155, at 
  Pages 46199-46200. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Tuesday, August 29 | 
               
              
                | 
                 LOCATION CHANGE. 10:00 AM. The 
  Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will hold a hearing regarding its notice of proposed 
  rule making pertaining to the application of
  
  26 U.S.C. § 199, which provides a deduction for income attributable to domestic 
  production activities, to certain transactions involving computer software. See,
  
  notice in the Federal Register, June 1, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 105, at Pages 31128-31129, and
  
  notice in the Federal Register, July 31, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 146, at Page 43085. 
  Location: IRS Auditorium (New Carrollton location), 5000 Ellin Road, Lanham, MD. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Wednesday, August 30 | 
               
              
                | 
                 Deadline to submit comments to the 
  Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in response to its notice of proposed rule making 
  pertaining to the application of
  
  26 U.S.C. § 199, which provides a deduction for income attributable to domestic 
  production activities, to certain transactions involving computer software. See,
  
  notice in the Federal Register, June 1, 2006, Vol. 71, No. 105, at Pages 
  31128-31129. 
                 | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
                  subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
                  to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
                  are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
                  month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
                  subscriptions are available for journalists,
                  federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
                  executive branch. The TLJ web site is
                  free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not 
                  published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
                  information page. 
                   
                  Contact: 202-364-8882. 
                  P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008. 
                  
                    
                  Privacy
                  Policy 
                  Notices
                  & Disclaimers 
                  Copyright 1998 - 2006 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved.  | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     |