|Apple and RealNetworks Dispute Legality of Harmony
7/30. RealNetworks announced a
product which it has named "Harmony Technology". RealNetworks
describes this as a digital rights management (DRM) translation system that will
enable consumers to transfer purchased music to most manufacturers music
devices. For example, it would enable someone who has purchased music recordings
from Apple iTunes to transfer the recordings to devices other than Apple's iPod
and iPod mini. Apple is upset.
RealNetworks stated in a
release on July 26 that "Harmony Technology frees consumers from the limitation of
being locked into a specific portable device when they buy digital music. Now
consumers can build their library of downloads secure in the knowledge that it
will play on virtually whatever device they choose."
It added that "With Harmony Technology, RealPlayer Music Store supports
more than 70 secure portable media devices, including all 4 generations of the
iPod and iPod mini, 14 products from Creative, 14 from Rio, 7 from RCA, 9 from
palmOne, 18 from iRiver, and products from Dell, Gateway, and Samsung. Generally
speaking, Harmony supports any device that uses the Apple FairPlay DRM, The
Microsoft Windows Media Audio DRM, or the RealNetworks Helix DRM, giving
RealPlayer Music Store support for more secure devices than any other music
store on the Internet."
On July 29 Apple stated in a release that "We are stunned that RealNetworks has
adopted the tactics and ethics of a hacker to break into the iPod(r), and we are
investigating the implications of their actions under the DMCA and other laws.
We strongly caution Real and their customers that when we update our iPod
software from time to time it is highly likely that Real's Harmony technology
will cease to work with current and future iPods."
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) contains, among other provisions,
§ 1201(a)(1)(A) of the Copyright Act, which was added in 1998 by the DMCA,
provides that "No person shall circumvent a technological measure that
effectively controls access to a work protected under this title."
Then, § 1201(a)(2)(A) provides that "No person shall manufacture, import,
offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology, product,
service, device, component, or part thereof, that --- (A) is primarily designed
or produced for the purpose of circumventing a technological measure that
effectively controls access to a work protected under this title;"
Furthermore, § 1201(b)(1)(A) provides that "No person shall manufacture,
import, offer to the public, provide, or otherwise traffic in any technology,
product, service, device, component, or part thereof, that --- (A) is primarily
designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing protection afforded by a
technological measure that effectively protects a right of a copyright owner
under this title in a work or a portion thereof;"
On July 30, Real Networks responded in a
release that "Harmony follows in a well-established tradition of fully
legal, independently developed paths to achieve compatibility. There is ample
and clear precedent for this activity, for instance the first IBM compatible PCs
from Compaq. Harmony creates a way to lock content from Real's music store in a
way that is compatible with the iPod, Windows Media DRM devices, and Helix DRM
RealNetworks added that "Harmony technology does not remove or disable
any digital rights management system. Apple has suggested that new laws such as the
DMCA are relevant to this dispute. In fact, the DMCA is not designed to prevent the
creation of new methods of locking content and explicitly allows the creation of
It argued that "Consumers, and not Apple, should be the ones choosing what
music goes on their iPod."
|FCC Issues NOI on Violent TV Programming
7/29. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) released a
Notice of Inquiry (NOI) [15 pages in PDF] that seeks public comment on "issues
relating to the presentation of violent programming on television and its impact on
The FCC seek comments in response to the following questions. "How much
violent programming is there, and what are the trends? What are the effects of viewing
violent programming on children and other segments of the population? If
particular portrayals of violence are more likely to cause deleterious effects
than others, what specific kinds of programming should be the focus of any
further public policymaking in this area? Should any further public policymaking
address all violence or just excessive or gratuitous violence, and how should
that be defined? Are the ratings system and the V-chip accomplishing their
intended purpose, or are there additional mechanisms that might be developed to
control exposure to media violence? Finally, are there legal constraints on
either Congress or the Commission to regulate violent programming?"
Michael Copps wrote in a
statement [PDF] that "Hundreds of studies over decades document the
harmful impact that exposure to graphic and excessive media violence has on the
physical and mental health of our children. The US Surgeon General, the American
Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychological Association, the American
Medical Association, and virtually every other leading medical and scientific
organization that has studied this issue have reached the same conclusion about
the harmful impact of media violence. Yet, the Commission today seems to ignore
this wealth of scientific data even going so far as to ask in this Notice
whether there are benefits of exposure to televised violence by our children."
This NOI is FCC 04-175 in MB Docket No. 04-261. Public comments are due by
September 15, 2004. Reply comments are due by October 15, 2004.
|Rep. Nadler Introduces Bill to Criminalize
Accessing Stored E-Mail
7/22. Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) and others
introduced HR 4977,
the "E-mail Privacy Protection Act of 2004". The bill would amend the Wiretap Act
and the Stored Communications Act, to provide that
accessing stored e-mail communications, including by e-mail service providers, can constitute
criminal violations. This bill
responds to the recent Appeals Court decision in USA v. Councilman, and perhaps
also, Google's announcement of its proposed Gmail service.
Rep. Nadler (at right)
is a senior member of the House Judiciary
Committee, which has jurisdiction over this bill. While this bill deals with internet
privacy, an issue also addressed by the House
Commerce Committee, since this bill only would amend the Criminal Code, it falls
within the jurisdiction of the House Judiciary Committee.
The bill would do two things. First, it would amend the definition in the
Wiretap Act of "electronic communication" to include certain stored
communications. Second, it would add a new subsection in the Store Communications Act
that would prohibit an electronic communication service
provider from acquiring or using electronic communications that it has stored.
18 U.S.C. § 2510(12)
currently provides that ''electronic communication'' means "any transfer of signs,
signals, writing, images, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole
or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectronic or photooptical system that
affects interstate or foreign commerce, but does not include -- (A) any wire or oral
communication; (B) any communication made through a tone-only paging device; (C) any
communication from a tracking device (as defined in section 3117 of this title); or (D)
electronic funds transfer information stored by a financial institution in a communications
system used for the electronic storage and transfer of funds;"
HR 4977 would amend this by by inserting
the phrase "and includes any temporary, intermediate storage of that communication
incidental to the electronic transmission thereof," after the word "commerce".
On June 29, 2004 the U.S. Court of
Appeals (1stCir) issued its split
in USA v. Bradford Councilman, a criminal case involving the Wiretap Act
and unauthorized accessing of the content of stored e-mail messages. (There was
no Stored Communications Act charge in that case.) The Court
held that there was no violation of the Wiretap Act when stored e-mail was accessed, because,
since it was in storage, there was no interception within the meaning of the statute.
The Court noted that § 2510 contains definitions of both "wire
communication" and "electronic communication", and that the definition of
"wire communication" includes "any electronic storage of such
communication", while the definition of "electronic communication" makes
no reference to stored communications. See,
"1st Circuit Holds Wiretap Act Does Not Apply to E-Mail in Storage" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 930, July 1, 2004.
Second, Rep. Nadler's bill would create a new prohibition in the Stored Communications
Act. It would add to 18 U.S.C. §
2701 a new subsection (d): "Improper Acquisition by Service Provider -- Whoever,
being a provider of an electronic communication service, or an agent or employee
of such a provider, acquires or uses the contents of a stored electronic
communication of which that provider, agent, or employee is not an intended
recipient other than for the purposes of providing that electronic communication
service, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or
This section would have the effect of prohibiting the sort of e-mail snooping
conducted by the defendant in the Councilman case. However, it is written
in language that is broad and vague enough to possibly encompass services such
as Google's Gmail that mechanically scan e-mail to facilitate the targeting of ads.
Google's Gmail is a new free browser based e-mail service that provides users
with one gigabyte of storage space, which is far more than any other free e-mail
service. In addition, Google's equipment scans e-mail messages, searches for key
words, and then displays targeted advertisements with e-mail messages in the
browser. Google further states that no person reads the messages.
See also, stories titled "Google's New Free E-Mail Service Starts Privacy
Debate" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 870, April 6, 2004; "Privacy Groups Request That
Google Suspend Its New Free Gmail Service" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 872, April 8, 2004; "EPIC Inquires About Use of Google
Technologies by FBI" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 889, May 3, 2004; and "Privacy Groups Argue that All Google Gmail
Users May Be Criminals" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 891, May 5, 2004.
The three original cosponsors of the bill are
Rep. Janice Schakowsky (D-IL),
Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and
Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH).
|Rep. Inslee Introduces
E-mail Privacy Act
7/22. Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) and others
introduced HR 4956,
the "E-mail Privacy Act of 2004". Like the Rep.
Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) bill,
HR 4977, this
bill responds to the Appeals Court
in USA v. Councilman, and provides increased legal protection under the Criminal
Code for stored e-mail communications. However, Rep. Inslee's bill would provide less onerous
limitations upon the activities of e-mail service providers.
Like Rep. Nadler's bill, Rep. Inslee's bill would amend the definitional section
of the Wiretap Act,
18 U.S.C. § 2510. However, Nadler's bill would amend the definition of
"electronic communication" while Inslee's bill would amend the definition of
Currently, subsection 2510(4) defines ''intercept'' as "the aural or other
acquisition of the contents of any wire, electronic, or oral communication
through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other device."
Rep. Inslee's bill would add on to this definition the following phrase:
"and, with respect to an electronic communication, includes the acquisition of
the contents of the communication through the use of any electronic, mechanical,
or other device, at any point between the point of origin and the point when it
is made available to the recipient".
Also, like Rep. Nadler's bill, Rep. Inslee's bill would amend the Stored
Currently, 18 U.S.C. §
2701(a) contains the basic prohibition, while subsection
(c) provides exceptions.
Subsection (c)(1) provides that the basic prohibition does not apply to
conduct authorized "by the person or entity providing a wire or electronic
communications service". Hence, in the Councilman case the defendant,
Bradford Councilman, was not charged with violation of the Stored Communications Act
because he was an officer of the service provider.
Rep. Inslee's bill would amend subsection (c)(1) by adding the following
phrase: "to the extent the access is a necessary incident to the rendition of
the service, the protection of the rights or property of the provider of that
service, or compliance with section 2702".
Since, Councilman secretly snooped on one of his customers for commercial
advantage, he could have been charged under the Stored Communications Act, if
Rep. Inslee's language had been law at the time.
Nevertheless, the language of Rep. Inslee's bill would still allow service
providers to access stored communications if it is "a necessary incident to the
rendition of the service" or for other reasons. Arguably, mechanically reading
e-mail in a free e-mail service to place targeted ads on web pages displaying
that e-mail would "a necessary incident to the rendition of the service".
Nevertheless, both bills lack clarity.
Rep. Inslee (at right) stated in a
"The American people are no longer confident that the law protects their right
to communicate privately via E-mail or other Internet communications, and
Congress will act to modernize America’s privacy laws if the courts fail to
maintain a strong privacy standard."
The three original cosponsors of the bill are
Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD),
Rep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) and
Rep. William Delahunt (D-MA). Rep. Flake and Rep.
Delahunt are members of the House Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction
over this bill.
Rep. Flake stated in the same release that "People who communicate through
E-mail deserve and expect the same privacy rights as those who use the
telephone. This bill reaffirms that expectation."
|GAO Reports on DOD's Global Information
7/29. The General Accounting Office (GAO)
released a report [37 pages in
PDF] titled "Defense Acquisitions: The Global Information Grid and Challenges Facing
The Global Information Grid (GIG) is a planned, internet like, secure network
and related information capabilities for Department
of Defense (DOD) operations. However, it will be less dependent on ground
based and fixed systems and equipment to transmit and route data, and more
dependent on space based and mobile ad hoc systems. The GIG will cost at
least $21 Billion through 2010. Deployment of core capabilities is scheduled for
around 2010, while full deployment is projected for around 2020.
The GAO report states that "To achieve long-term dominance over
evolving, sophisticated threats, the Department of Defense (DOD) is seeking to
make transformational improvements to military capabilities. The transformation
involves achieving information and decision superiority over adversaries,
striking with precision, deploying and sustaining military power rapidly, and
dominating the “battlespace” on land, at sea, in the air, and in space. DOD has
said that a successful transformation hinges largely on disparate weapon systems
sharing information seamlessly ..."
The report continues that "A primary difference
between the GIG initiative and previous efforts is that it focuses on promoting
interoperability by building an Internet-like network for DOD related operations
based on common standards and protocols rather than on trying to establish
interoperability after individual systems and platforms have been fielded."
The House Armed Services Committee's
Subcommittee on Terrorism, Unconventional Threats, and Capabilities requested
this report to obtain a summary of the GIG, and to identify challenges facing
The report finds that "The most critical challenge ahead for DOD
is making the GIG a reality. While DOD has taken steps to define its vision and
objectives for the GIG on paper and in policy and is beginning to make a
substantial investment in the GIG as well as in systems that will be heavily
dependent on the GIG, it is not fully known how DOD will meet these objectives."
See also, DOD
Directive No. 8100.1, dated September 19, 2002, and titled "Global
Information Grid (GIG) Overarching Policy", and the DOD's
|Tech Issues in Presidential Election
7/31. The Presidential candidates touched on several technology related
issues in recent speeches. They discussed trade, protectionism, outsourcing,
and education and training, although in vague terms.
President Bush has been talking about math and science education and high
tech jobs. For example, on July 30 he gave a campaign
in Springfield, Missouri. He said that "This world of ours is changing. The jobs
of the future will require greater knowledge and higher level skills. We'll
reform our high schools to make sure a high school diploma means something. We
will expand math and science education so our young people can compete in a high
tech world. We will expand the use of the Internet to bring high-level training
into our classrooms. With four more years, we'll help a rising generation gain
the skills and the confidence to achieve the American Dream."
This is a component that Bush also repeats in other speeches. See for example,
in Grand Rapids, Michigan on July 30,
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on July 31,
in Cambridge, Ohio on July 31, and
in Canton, Ohio on July 31..
Bush has also spoken about trade recently. He said in his July 31
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania that "In order to keep jobs here,
in order to make sure this economy continues to grow, we will reject economic
isolationism. We will insist on a level playing field when it comes to trade."
He added in his July 31
speech in Canton, Ohio that "I know there's great concern about trade
in eastern Ohio. Let me tell you something about trade. I believe that America
and Americans can compete with anybody, anyplace, anywhere so long as the rules
are fair. We understand what currency valuations can do to manufacturing,
particularly in eastern Ohio. We've been working with China to put fair policy
in place. Just give us a chance to compete, is all we're asking.
We've been enforcing our trade agreements. We're making sure that our workers
and our manufacturers are treated fairly."
Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) also alluded
to trade and offshore outsourcing. He said in his
to the Democratic National Convention on July 29 that his plan is to "close the
tax loopholes that reward companies for shipping our jobs overseas. Instead, we
will reward companies that create and keep good paying jobs where they belong --
in the good old U.S.A." He further referenced international trade. He said that
"we will trade and compete in the world. But our plan calls for a fair playing
Sen. John Edwards (D-NC) was more specific
in his speech
to the Democratic National Convention on July 28. He said that "Our plan will stop
giving tax breaks to companies that outsource your jobs. Instead, we will give tax
breaks to American companies that keep jobs here in America. And we will invest
in the jobs of the future -- in the technologies and innovation to ensure that
America stays ahead of the competition."
Kerry also said that "our economic plan to build a stronger America"
includes "investment in technology and innovation that will create the good-paying
jobs of the future". See also, Kerry Edwards
|Terrorism Threat Level Raised for Financial Services
Facilities in Washington DC, NYC and NJ
8/1. Secretary of Homeland Security
Tom Ridge stated at a
press conference in
Washington DC on Sunday afternoon, August 1, that "the United States Government
is raising the threat level to Code Orange for the financial services sector in
New York City, Northern New Jersey and Washington, DC." See,
Ridge (at right) explained
that "As of now, this is what we know: reports indicate that al-Qaeda is targeting
several specific buildings, including the International Monetary Fund and World Bank
in DC; Prudential Financial in Northern New Jersey; and Citigroup buildings and the
New York Stock Exchange in New York. Let me assure you, actions to further strengthen
security around these buildings are already underway. Additionally, we're concerned about
targets beyond these and are working to get more information."
He added that "Compared to previous threat reporting, these intelligence
reports have provided a level of detail that is very specific. The quality of this
intelligence, based on multiple reporting streams in multiple locations, is
rarely seen and is alarming in both the amount and specificity of the
The main World Bank building is located at 1818 H
St. NW, just off of Pennsylvania Ave. between the White House and George
Washington University (GWU). It takes up the block between 18th and 19th and G
and H Streets. The International Monetary Fund
(IMF) building is located at 700
19th St. NW. It takes up the block just to the west of the World Bank. In the
next block to the west is the GWU School of Law.
The Federal Reserve Bank
buildings are several blocks to the south. The main Treasury Building and
Treasury annex are several blocks to the east, on the other side of the White
House, near the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit.
|Bush Gives Majoras and Liebowitz Recess
Appointments to the FTC
7/30. President Bush announced his intent to give recess appointments to
Deborah Majoras and Jon Leibowitz to be Commissioners of the
Commission (FTC). Bush intends to designate Majoras as Chairman, replacing Timothy Muris.
See, White House
Bush nominated Majoras for a Republican position on the FTC on May 11, 2004.
This is for the remainder of a seven year term expiring on September 25, 2008.
Bush nominated Liebowitz on April 8, 2004 for a Democratic position on the FTC.
On May 11, 2004, Muris wrote in a brief
statement that "I plan to
leave the Federal Trade Commission this summer." See, story titled "Muris
Resigns, Majoras Nominated" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 896, May 12, 2004.
The Senate Commerce Committee, which
oversees the FTC, held a hearing on both nominees on June 2, 2004. See,
titled "Senate Commerce Committee Holds Hearing on FTC Nominees" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 910, June 3, 2004.
The FTC handles many technology related matters. However,
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) and
Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) oppose the
nomination of Majoras for non-technology related reasons. They are engaging in
partisan election year posturing on a matter largely unrelated to matters that
will be decided by the FTC -- gasoline prices on the West Coast. The FTC has no
authority to regulate gasoline prices. Nor does it have authority to impose an
industry wide moratorium on oil industry mergers, as Sen. Boxer has requested.
Both Sen. Wyden and Sen. Boxer face elections in November.
The Senate Commerce Committee held a meeting to vote on both nominees on July
22. However, Sen. Wyden invoked an arcane Senate procedural rule that prevented
the votes from taking place. The Senate then recessed until early September.
See, story titled "Sen. Wyden Blocks FTC Nominees" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
945, July 26, 2004.
|More People and Appointments
President Bush announced his intent to give a recess
appointment to Jonathan
Dudas (at right) to be Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and
Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO). He was named Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and
Deputy Director of the USPTO in 2002. When the former Director, James Rogan,
left in January of 2004, Dudas became the acting Director. Bush nominated Dudas on March
22, 2004 to replace Rogan. The Senate Judiciary
Committee held a hearing on his nomination on May 6, 2004. See, story
titled "Senate Judiciary Committee Holds Hearing on Nomination of Dudas to
Head the USPTO" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 894, May 10, 2004. The SJC approved his nomination, without
objection, on May 20. See, White House
7/19. Brad Huther
was named CEO of the International Intellectual
Property Institute (IIPI). He replaces
Bruce Lehman, who joined
the Washington DC office of the law firm of Akin
Gump. Huther previously worked at the Department of Commerce. In 2002 and 2003 Huther
worked at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
(USPTO) as Senior Advisor to the former head of the USPTO, James Rogan.
From 1999 through 2002, Huther was a Special Attaché to the
World Intellectual Property Organization
(WIPO). Lehman, who was the first head of the USPTO during the Clinton Gore
administration, remains the Chairman of the
Board of Directors of the IIPI. Before his appointment to the USPTO, he worked
for the law firm of Swidler & Berlin. And before that, he worked for the
House Judiciary Committee. See, IIPI
7/27. The National Telecommunications Cooperative
Association (NTCA) hired Erica Ferri and Brian O'Hara as government
affairs representatives. Ferri previously worked for
Rep. Amo Houghton (R-NY), who has announced
that he will not run for re-election. See, NTCA
7/30. Lawrence Tu was named SVP and General Counsel of
Dell Inc. He replaces Thomas Green,
who had been Dell's General Counsel since 1994. Tu was previously EVP and
General Counsel of NBC Universal. See, Dell
7/29. Computer Associates
International, Inc. announced that its Board of Directors has nominated Laura
Unger, a former Commissioner of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), to be an independent Director. She will replace Alex
Serge Vieux. Unger worked for the Senate
Banking Committee before her appointment to the SEC. See, CAI
7/28. Robert Acker was named VP of the RealPlayer Business at
RealNetworks, Inc. He was a founding member
of the XM Satellite Radio team. Aref Matin was named VP for Carrier and System
Software. He previously worked for Juniper Networks and
|Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red.
|Monday, August 2
The House and Senate will not meet from July 26 through September 6.
Deadline to submit applications to the
Department of Commerce's (DOC) Technology
Administration (TA) to join the TA's business development mission to
Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. This delegation will include
U.S. based senior executives representing the information and communications
technology sector. See,
notice in the Federal Register, May 26, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 102, at Pages
29928 - 29930.
|Wednesday, August 4
9:30 AM. The Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) will hold a meeting. The
agenda [PDF] includes The agenda includes a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) and Declaratory Ruling (DR) regarding the Department
of Justice's (DOJ) request that the FCC administratively amend the CALEA statute to cover
information services, such as VOIP. It also includes consideration of various
applications for certification of digital output protection technologies and recording
methods under the FCC's broadcast flag rule. The event will be webcast. Location:
FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C05 (Commission Meeting Room).
|Friday, August 6
10:00 AM. The U.S.
Court of Appeals (FedCir) will hear oral argument in Sony Electronics, Inc.,
et al. v. Soundview Technologies, Inc., a patent infringement and antitrust
case involving V-Chip parental television control technology. This is App. Ct. No.
04-1057, an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, No.
3:00cv754(JBA), Judge Janet Arterton presiding. See, opinion published at 157 F. Supp.
2d 180 (2001), opinion granting summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of Sony
and other television manufacturers, published at 225 F. Supp. 2d 164 (2002), and August
28, 2003 opinion
[8 pages in PDF] granting plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on Soundview's antitrust
and unfair trade practices counterclaims. Location: Courtroom
402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
2:30 PM. The U.S. Court of
Appeals (FedCir) will hear oral argument in Irdeto Access v. Echostar,
No. 04-1154. Location: Courtroom 402, 717 Madison Place, NW.
1:00 - 4:00 PM. The DC
Bar Association will host a continuing legal education (CLE) program titled
"USA PATRIOT Act Primer". The speakers will include
Brown (Foley & Lardner). See,
notice. Prices vary from $80 to $95. For more information, call 202 626-3488.
Location: D.C. Bar Conference Center, B-1 Level, 1250 H Street, NW.
EXTENDED TO OCTOBER 8.
Deadline to submit reply comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response
to its public notice (DA 04-1690) requesting public comments on constitutionally
permissible ways for the FCC to identify and eliminate market entry barriers for small
telecommunications businesses and to further opportunities in the allocation of spectrum
based services for small businesses and businesses owned by women and minorities. See,
notice in the Federal Register, June 22, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 119, at Pages
34672 - 34673. See also,
notice of extension [PDF].
Deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in
response to its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding the process for
designation of eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) and the FCC's rules
regarding high-cost universal service support. This NPRM is FCC 04-127 in
Docket No. 96-45. See,
notice in the Federal Register, July 7, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 129, at Pages
40839 - 40843.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in
response to its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding the
rechannelization of portions of the 17.7-19.7 GHz band. This NPRM is FCC 04-77
in WT Docket No. 04-143. See, notice in the Federal Register, July 7, 2004,
Vol. 69, No. 129, at Pages 40843 - 40850.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR)
regarding its Special 301 out of cycle review of Israel and other nations.
Section 182 of the Trade Act of 1974, which is codified at
19 U.S.C. § 2242,
requires the USTR to identify countries that deny adequate and effective
protection of intellectual property rights or deny fair and equitable market
access to U.S. persons who rely on intellectual property protection. This is
also referred to as the Special 301 provision. See,
notice in the Federal Register, July 13, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 133, at Pages
|Monday, August 9
10:00 AM. 2:30 PM. The U.S.
Court of Appeals (FedCir) will hear oral argument in Business Object v.
Microstrategy, No. 04-1009. Location: Courtroom 203, 717 Madison Place, NW.
Extended deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
regarding its proceeding titled "In the
Matter of Review of the Commission's Broadcast and Cable Equal Employment
Opportunity Rules and Policies". This is MM Docket No. 98-204. See,
notice of extension [PDF].
|More FCC News
7/30. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) published a
notice in the Federal Register that describes, and sets comment deadlines for, its
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) [11 pages in PDF] that proposes to
require that television and radio broadcasters retain program recordings for a
period of time for purposes of enforcing the statutory prohibition, codified at
18 U.S.C. § 1464,
against obscene, indecent, or profane programming. The FCC adopted this item on
June 21, 2004 and released it on July 7, 2004. This NPRM is FCC 04-145 MM Docket
No. 04-232. See, story titled "FCC Proposes That Broadcasters Retain
Recordings To Facilitate Enforcement of Smut Ban" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
933, July 8, 2004. Comments are due by August 27, 2004. Reply comments are due
by September 27, 2004. See, Federal Register, July 30, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 146,
at Pages 45665 - 45668.
7/27. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) announced the award of 154 Multichannel Video Distribution and Data Service
MVDDS licenses following the completion of Auction No. 53, review of the applications,
and receipt of payments. See, FCC
Public Notice [PDF], and
Attachment A [PDF], the list of granted applications.
7/30. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
notice in the Federal Register that describes, and states the effective date
for, its final rule amending its Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) by revising the
fees charged to entities accessing the National Do Not Call Registry. The
effective date is September 1, 2004. See, Federal Register, July 30, 2004, Vol.
69, No. 146, at Pages 45580 - 45586.
7/29. The Office of the U.S. Trade
Representative (USTR) published a
notice in the Federal Register announcing that the interagency Trade Policy
Staff Committee (TPSC) will hold a public hearing on on September 23, 2004 to
assist the USTR in preparing its annual report to the Congress on the Peoples
Republic of China's compliance with the commitments that it made in connection
with its accession to the World Trade Organization
(WTO). The USTR seeks comments on, among other issues, intellectual property
rights and intellectual property enforcement. Persons wishing to testify orally
at the hearing must provide written notification and a copy of their written
testimony by 12:00 NOON on September 10, 2004. Written comments are due by 12:00
NOON on September 15, 2004. See, Federal Register, July 29, 2004, Vol. 69, No.
145, at Pages 45369 - 45370.
7/26. The Copyright Office published a
notice in the Federal Register that "directs all claimants to royalty fees
collected for calendar year 2002 under the cable statutory license to submit comments as
to whether a Phase I or Phase II controversy exists as to the distribution of those fees
and announces the deadline for the filing of Notices of Intention to Participate in a royalty
distribution proceeding concerning those royalty fees." Comments and Notices of
Intention to Participate are due by August 25, 2004. See, Federal Register, July
26, 2004, Vol. 69, No. 142, at Pages 44548 - 44549.
7/28. SBC announced that it filed a complaint in Superior Court for the state
of California against the City of Stockton alleging that its ordinance assessing
a tax on telephone customers to fund an E-911 program is illegal. See, SBC
7/30. The General Accounting Office (GAO)
released a report [56
pages in PDF] titled "Information Technology: DOD's Acquisition Policies and
Guidance Need to Incorporate Additional Best Practices and Controls". The report
finds that while the "DOD's revisions to its
systems acquisition policies and guidance incorporate many best practices for
acquiring business systems", the revised policies and guidance for acquisition
of information technology "do not incorporate a number of other best practices,
particularly those associated with acquiring commercial component-based business
|Notice of Change of E-Mail
The e-mail address for Tech Law Journal has changed. The new address is
All previous e-mail addresses no longer operate. This new address is
published as a graphic to avoid e-mail address harvesting, and the associated
spam messages and malicious code messages. If your e-mail system does not
display graphics, see notice in TLJ website.
|About Tech Law Journal
Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Copyright 1998 - 2004 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All