|Supreme Court Grants Cert in Trademark Case
1/9. The Supreme Court granted
certiorari in KP Permanent Make-Up v.
Lasting Impressions. See,
Order List [PDF]. This is a a trademark dispute involving companies that
sell permanent makeup.
KP Permanent Make-Up and Lasting Impressions are competitors in the permanent
make-up business. Permanent make-up involves injecting pigment into the skin. Lasting
Impressions registered a trademark with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that consists
of the term "micro colors" set in white within a black box. This is Registration
No. 1,769,592. KP also uses the term "micro colors" on its products and brochures.
KP filed a complaint in
U.S. District Court (CDCal) against
Lasting Impressions seeking a declaratory judgment that it did not infringe.
Lasting Impressions counterclaimed alleging trademark infringement. The District
Court concluded that the term "micro colors" is generic, or if not generic,
descriptive. It further held that neither party had acquired secondary meaning
in the term "micro color." Finally, it held that that KP's use was protected
under the "fair use" defense,
15 U.S.C. § 1115(b)(4).
On April 30, 2003, the
U.S. Court of Appeals (9thCir) issued
opinion [20 pages in PDF] reversing and remanding.
On the genericness issue, the Appeals Court held that "A reasonably minded
jury could not conclude from the evidence produced that ``micro colors´´ is a
generic term" and "KP's motion for summary judgment cannot be upheld on this
ground. Furthermore, Lasting’s motion for summary adjudication on the issue of
genericness should be granted."
On the issue of descriptiveness, the Appeals Court held that "Lasting's
incontestable registration is conclusive evidence that the mark is
non-descriptive or has acquired secondary meaning, and there is no need to
require a showing of secondary meaning in the term ``micro colors´´ apart from
the mark. Therefore, KP’s motion for summary judgment cannot be upheld on this
Finally, on the fair use issued, the Appeals Court held that "the fair use
defense claimed by KP is a classic fair use defense that requires that there not
be a likelihood of confusion. Because there are genuine issues of material fact
concerning the likelihood of confusion, KP’s motion for summary judgment cannot
be upheld on this ground."
This case is KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impressions, Inc. et
al, Supreme Court No. 03-409, on petition for writ of certiorari to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, No. 01-56055.
|Court of Appeals Dismisses KERM Petition for
Review for Lack of Standing
1/9. The U.S. Court of Appeals (DCCir)
opinion [8 pages in PDF] in KERM v. FCC, a case regarding
standing to challenge enforcement orders of the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC). The Appeals Court dismissed KERM's petition for
review for lack of standing.
KERM filed a complaint with the FCC alleging that KAYH-FM, a non-commercial
educational broadcaster, unlawfully aired 11 announcements that constituted commercial
advertisements in violation
47 U.S.C. § 399b(b)(2).
The FCC found that 10 of the 11 announcements
did not violate the statute, and that no enforcement action was warranted with
respect to the single remaining announcement. KERM then filed the present
petition for review with the Court of Appeals.
The Court of Appeals did not
address the merits of the FCC enforcement decision. Rather, it found that KERM
lacked standing to challenge the order under Article III of the Constitution,
and therefore dismissed the petition for review.
The Court of Appeals wrote that "KERM describes itself as a
``listener´´ and ``competitor´´
of KAYH, suggesting that it has standing on these bases. There is no doubt that
both listeners and competitors may, in appropriate cases, demonstrate standing
to challenge actions of the FCC under the Communications Act."
However, the Court wrote that "KERM cannot prevail on a theory
of listener standing because it challenges only a discrete, past injury and
alleges no continuing violations." Also, "KERM fares no better under a theory of
competitor standing. A party seeking to establish standing on this basis must
demonstrate that it is ``a direct and current competitor whose bottom line may
be adversely affected by the challenged government action.´´" (Citations omitted.)
The Court added that "KERM might have satisfied the requirements
of competitor standing if it had introduced evidence that KAYH’s broadcast of
the disputed announcements resulted in lost advertising revenues for KERM or
otherwise adversely affected KERM's financial interests. KERM offered no such
This case is KERM, Inc. v. FCC and USA, No. 03-1028, a
petition for review of a final order of the FCC.
|7th Circuit Addresses Market Power and Distinct
1/9. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(7thCir) issued its
opinion [10 pages in PDF] in Menasha v. New America Marketing In-Store,
an antitrust case involving the question of whether at the shelf coupon
dispensers in stores constitute a distinct market.
New America makes at the shelf coupon dispensers, and enters into exclusive
contracts with retailers. Menasha, which
also dispenses at the shelf coupons, filed a complaint in
U.S. District Court (NDIll) against
New America alleging violation of federal antitrust laws. The District Court
granted summary judgment to New America, and the Appeals Court affirmed. New
America does not have market power because at the shelf coupon dispenses are not
a distinct market. There are many substitutes for at the shelf dispensers.
This case is Menasha Corporation v. New America Marketing In Store, Inc.
and New America Marketing In-Store Services, Inc., U.S. Court of Appeals for
the 7th Circuit, No. 03-1302, an appeal from the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, D.C. No. 00 C 1895, Judge Harry
|Verizon's Seidenberg Addresses
Seidenberg, Ch/CEO of Verizon
Communications, gave a
speech at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Nevada. He mostly addressed
Verizon's plans, investments, and products. But, he also touched on regulatory issues.
He stated that "Of course, for broadband to reach its full potential, lots of
things have to go right. We've gotten it pretty much right in the wireless world, where
-- for the most part -- government has stayed out of the way of capital formation and
innovation. We've gotten it more or less right for the large business market,
where Enterprise customers have lots of competitors vying to deliver the latest
He continued that "And we can get it right in the consumer market, too, if we
put the customer in the center of the picture. As the Consumer
Electronics Association has noted, Verizon's recent legal victory against the
Industry Association of America is one example of ``getting it right´´ by standing up for
consumer rights and technological innovation."
That is, on December 19, 2003 the
U.S. Court of Appeals (DCCir) issued its
opinion [16 pages in PDF] in RIAA v. Verizon, reversing the
District Court, and holding that a Section 512(h) subpoena may only be issued to
an ISP that is engaged in storing on its servers material that is infringing or
the subject of infringing activity. This opinion deprives the RIAA and copyright
holders of an expeditious and inexpensive means for acquiring the names of P2P
infringers from their ISPs. See, story titled "DC Circuit
Reverses in RIAA v. Verizon", also published in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
804, December 22, 2003.
Seidenberg then added, "And the federal government can take another big
step by clearing the path, once and for all, for broadband investment -- as
urged by the High-Tech Broadband Coalition and the C.E.A. -- so we can get this
vital technology in customers' hands."
The High Tech Broadband Coalition (HTBC),
of which the CEA is a member, has filed many comments with the FCC on this
subject. See especially,
comment [79 pages in PDF] filed on April 5, 2002, and related TLJ
"Broadband Coalition Advocates Relief from Unbundling Requirements" in TLJ Daily
E-Mail Alert No. 403, April 4, 2002. See also,
comment [16 pages in PDF] submitted on November 6, 2003.
|IBM Receives Wells Notice from SEC
1/8. IBM stated in a release that "it
has received a ``Wells Notice´´ from the staff of the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with the SEC's
investigation of a customer of IBM's Retail Stores Solutions unit, which sells
point-of-sale products." IBM added that the IBM customer is
Dollar General Corporation.
IBM offered this explanation of a Wells notice. "The Wells Notice notifies
IBM that the SEC staff is considering recommending
that the SEC bring a civil action against IBM for possible violations of the
U.S. securities laws relating to Dollar General's accounting for a specific
transaction, by participating in and aiding and abetting Dollar General's
misstatement of its 2000 results. In that transaction, IBM paid Dollar General
$11M for certain used equipment as part of a sale of IBM replacement equipment
in Dollar General's 2000 fourth fiscal quarter."
IBM elaborated that "Under the SEC's procedures, IBM has the opportunity
to respond to the SEC staff before the staff makes a formal recommendation regarding
whether any action should be brought against IBM by the SEC."
|People and Appointments
1/9. Rep. Jim Turner (D-TX)
announced that he will not run for re-election. He is currently the
ranking Democrat on the House
Select Committee on Homeland Security.
1/9. President Bush named Matthew Kirk Deputy Assistant to the
President for Legislative Affairs -- Senate. He replaces Ziad Ojakli who will be
leaving the White House for the private sector. See,
1/9. Nancy Jardini was named Chief of Criminal Investigation (CI) at
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). She
replaces David Palmer, who just retired. See,
1/9. James McCue was named President of Comcast
Capital Corporation. He replaces Abram Patlove. See,
1/6. Jan Jaferian was named Intellectual Property
Business President of Lucent Technologies,
effective immediately. She was previously Vice President and General Manager of
Xerox Corporation's Intellectual Property Operations. See, Lucent
12/29. The law firm of Wiley Rein & Fielding
announced the selection of new partners, including
Hindin. Walker was of counsel to the firm. Before that, she was an
Associate Counsel in the Office of White House Counsel. Before that she an
election attorney in Florida for the Bush Cheney campaign. Prior to that, she
was Senior Legal Advisor and Chief of Staff to former FCC Commissioner Harold
Furchtgott-Roth, the FCC's free market economist. Walker's background also
includes working as an aide to Sen. Strom
Thurmond (R-SC), a clerk to Judge Harvey Wilkerson (USCA, 4th Cir), a clerk
to Justice Clarence Thomas, and an associate at
Gibson Dunn and Crutcher. Hindin
focuses on regulatory, policy and transactional matters before the FCC and
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), particularly for satellite.
|Washington Tech Calendar
New items are highlighted in red.
|Monday, January 12
The House is in adjournment. (It will convene on January 20, 2004.)
The Senate is in adjournment. (It will convene on January 20, 2004.)
Court will return from the recess that it began on December 15, 2003.
Court will hear oral argument in Nixon v. Missouri
Municipal League, and related petitions, regarding
47 U.S.C. § 253(a) and
state statutes that prohibit political subdivisions from offering telecommunications
services. See, story titled "Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Nixon v. Missouri
Municipal League" in TLJ
Daily E-Mail Alert No. 687, June 25, 2003, and "Briefs Filed With Supreme
Court in Nixon v. Missouri Municipal League" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No.
776, November 11, 2003. Location: 1 First St., NW.
2:00 PM. The
Department of Homeland Security's Information
Analysis & Infrastructure Protection (IAIP) Directorate will host a meeting
with private sector leaders regarding protective security measures against terrorism.
For more information, contact 202 282-8010. Location: Washington Convention Center
Deadline to submit comments to the
Department of Commerce's (DOC)
Industry and Security (BIS), which is also known as the Bureau of Export
Administration (BXA), regarding its notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
regarding amending the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to implement a
revised version of the BIS's Simplified Network Application Processing (SNAP+)
system. This proposed rule also would mandate use of SNAP+ for all filings of
Export License applications (except Special Comprehensive Licenses), Reexport
Authorization requests, Classification requests, Encryption Review requests,
and License Exception AGR notifications, unless the BIS authorizes paper
filing for a particular user or transaction. See,
notice in the Federal Register, November 12, 2003, Vol. 68, No. 218, at
|Tuesday, January 13
9:00 AM. The North American Numbering Council (NANC)
will meet. See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 2, 2003, Vol. 68, No. 231, at
Page 67441. Location: FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C305.
TO BE DECIDED WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT.
9:30 AM. The U.S. Court of Appeals
(DCCir) will hear oral argument in Carol De La Hunt v. FCC, No. 03-1029.
Judges Edwards, Roberts and Williams will preside. Location: 333 Constitution Ave. NW.
3:00 - 6:00 PM. The National Infrastructure Advisory Council (NIAC) will
meet. The NIAC advises the President on the security of information systems
for critical infrastructure supporting other sectors of the economy, including
banking and finance, transportation, energy, manufacturing, and emergency
government services. For more information, contact Nancy Wong at 202 482-7488.
notice in the Federal Register, December 24, 2003, Vol. 68, No. 247, at
Pages 74624 - 74625. Location: Room 207, Washington Convention Center, 801
Mount Vernon Place, NW.
6:00 - 8:15 PM. The
Federal Communications Bar Association (FCBA)
will host a Continuing Legal Education (CLE) program titled "FCC Equipment
Regulation". The speakers will be Henry Goldberg (Goldberg Godles),
Lazarus (Fletcher Heald & Hildreth), Richard Fabina (FCC's
Office of Engineering and
Technology), Cathy Zima (FCC's Wireline Competition Bureau), and Brian Butler
(FCC's Enforcement Bureau). The prices to attend range from $50 to $125. For more
information, contact Mitchell Lazarus at 703 812-0440 or
Skadden Arps, 700 14th Street, NW, 11th Floor.
|Wednesday, January 14
10:30 AM - 12:00 NOON. The
Center for Strategic and International Studies
(CSIS) will host a program titled "Trade With China After WTO".
The speakers will be Robert
Cassidy (former Assistant U.S. Trade Representative) and Tian Jun (Minister Counselor
for Economic Policy, Embassy of China). See,
notice [PDF]. For more information, contact Mark Schoeff at
202 775-3242 or email@example.com. Location: CSIS,
1800 K Street, NW, B-1 Conference Level.
12:30 PM. Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman
Michael Powell will
give a luncheon speech. For information about prices and reservations, call
202 662-7501. Location: Ballroom, National
Press Club, 529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor.
Deadline to submit comments to the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its
and Order Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking [72 pages in PDF] in its
proceeding titled "In the Matter of Digital Broadcast Content Protection".
This item is FCC 03-273 in MB Docket 02-230. This FNPRM seeks comment regarding a
permanent approval mechanism for content protection and recording technologies
to be used in conjunction with device outputs. For more information, contact
Rick Chessen firstname.lastname@example.org or Susan Mort at
email@example.com or 202-418-7200.
EXTENDED TO FEBRUARY 13.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response
to its Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding digital plug and play
compatibility. This item is FCC 03-225 in CS Docket 97-80 and PP Docket 00-67.
notice in the Federal Register, November 28, 2003, Vol. 68, No. 229, at Pages 66776 -
order [PDF] extending deadlines.
Deadline to submit comments to the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response
to its Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) regarding revisions to the FCC's
high cost universal service support mechanism. This is FCC 03-249 in CC Docket No.
96-45. This is also known as the "10th Circuit Remand". See,
notice in the Federal Register, December 15, 2003, Vol. 68, No. 240, at
Pages 69641 - 69647. See also, stories titled "FCC Announces Order on Remand
Regarding High Cost Universal Service Support Mechanism" in
TLJ Daily E-Mail
Alert No. 761, October 20, 2003, and "FCC Publishes Notices Regarding 10th
Circuit Universal Service Remand" in TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert No. 800, December
1/8. Adrian Lamo pled guilty in U.S.
District Court (SDNY) to one count of hacking into a computer system. The
Department of Justice stated in a
the one count
information, filed on January 8, alleges that "on February 26, 2002, LAMO hacked
into the New York Times' internal computer network and accessed a database
containing personal information (including home telephone numbers and Social
Security numbers) for more than 3,000 contributors to the New York Times' Op-Ed
page." Lamo did not try to conceal his entry. Rather, he added his name and phone
number to the database, listing his expertise as "computer hacking, national
security, communications intelligence". The previously filed criminal complaint
recites the New York Times intrusion. It also alleges intrusions into the
computer systems of Yahoo, Microsoft, MCI WorldCom, SBC, and Cingular.
1/9. The Joe Lieberman for President campaign released a campaign
regarding protecting personal privacy.
1/9. The Progress and Freedom Foundation (PFF)
[18 pages in PDF] titled "Principles for Texas Communications Law". It
was written by Raymond Gifford and Adam Peters of the PFF. The paper argues that
"In its aims, state law reflects the legacy purposes of regulation: to protect,
and then control a franchised monopoly carrier through pervasive oversight of
the rates, terms and service packages that are offered. While this legal legacy
served its purpose, its remnants now often impede the current aim of
communications law: to transition from a regulated monopoly to an open,
competitive environment." The paper focuses on the state of Texas. It urges the
Texas PUC to allow retail rates to "gravitate towards their true price, with
accompanying reductions in intrastate access (and long-distance), vertical
service, and business rates."
1/8. The Software and Information Industry
Association (SIIA) wrote a
letter [3 pages
in PDF] to Secretary of Education Ron Paige regarding implementation of the No
Child Left Behind Act. The SIIA argues that "many NCLB goals and requirements
can not be adequately achieved without technology tools."
1/9. The Recording Industry Association of
America (RIAA) announced in a release "a $200,000 settlement of claims
involving the unauthorized pressing of vinyl by United Record Pressing LLC that
allegedly infringed copyrights owned by RIAA members."
|About Tech Law Journal
|Tech Law Journal publishes a free access web site and
subscription e-mail alert. The basic rate for a subscription
to the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert is $250 per year. However, there
are discounts for subscribers with multiple recipients. Free one
month trial subscriptions are available. Also, free
subscriptions are available for journalists,
federal elected officials, and employees of the Congress, courts, and
executive branch. The TLJ web site is
free access. However, copies of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert are not
published in the web site until one month after writing. See, subscription
Contact: 202-364-8882; E-mail.
P.O. Box 4851, Washington DC, 20008.
Copyright 1998 - 2004 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All