| Ways & Means Committee
                  Passes Trade Promotion Authority Bill | 
               
              
                10/9. The House
                  Ways and Means Committee amended and approved HR 3005
                  [PDF], the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act of 2001,
                  by a vote of 26 to 13 on Tuesday night, October 9. All of
                  the Republican members of the Committee voted for the bill.
                  Two Democrats voted for the bill, while several more did not
                  vote.
                   
                  See, HR
                  3005 [57 pages in PDF] as introduced. The Committee
                  approved an amendment in the nature of a substitute offered by
                  Chairman Bill
                  Thomas (R-CA), which did not alter the key provisions of
                  the bill. The Committee also approved an amendment offered by Rep. Benjamin Cardin
                  (D-MD) regarding foreign corrupt practices.
                   
                  Trade promotion authority (TPA), which is also known as fast
                  track, gives the President authority to negotiate trade
                  agreements which can only be voted up or down, but not
                  amended, by the Congress. TPA strengthens the bargaining
                  position of the President, and the U.S. Trade Representative, in
                  negotiations with other nations.
                   
                  Technology companies that export equipment, software, or
                  services, and that seek greater protection abroad for their
                  intellectual property rights, stand to benefit from enactment
                  of TPA.
                   
                  This bill gives the President authority to negotiate
                  agreements that only reduce tariffs without the need for any
                  implementation from the Congress. (See, § 3(a).) The
                  bill also gives the President trade promotion authority to
                  negotiate agreements that address both tariff and non-tariff
                  barriers. (See, § 3(b).)
                   
                  TPA is a controversial issue, but not primarily because of the
                  basic authority granted to the President. Rather, the intense
                  debate has focused on the appropriate role of labor and
                  environmental standards in free trade agreements (FTAs). Free
                  traders and Republicans have tended to argue that these are
                  social issues that are not appropriately included in trade
                  agreements. In addition, there are concerns in Congress about
                  surrendering constitutional authority to the President.
                  Moreover, there are also some important, but not frequently
                  debated, standards in the bill pertaining to intellectual
                  property rights and e-commerce.
                   
                  HR 3005 attempts to strike a compromise on both labor and
                  environmental standards, and maintaining a significant role
                  for the Congress in trade agreement negotiations. The bill
                  sets "overall trade negotiating objectives" and
                  "principal trade negotiating objectives". Among the
                  principal trade negotiating objectives are "to ensure
                  that a party to a trade agreement with the United States does
                  not fail to effectively enforce its environmental or labor
                  laws, through a sustained or recurring course of action or
                  inaction ..." and "to strengthen the capacity of
                  United States trading partners to protect the environment
                  ..." Moreover, the bill also provides that trade
                  agreements that cover tariff and non-tariff barriers "may
                  be entered into ... only if such agreement makes progress in
                  meeting the applicable objectives ..."
                   
                  HR 3005 attempts to involve Congress in the process by
                  mandating various consultations with the Congress.
                   
                  Rep. Sander Levin
                  (D-MI) was the most vocal opponent of the bill. He argued that
                  the bill does not go far enough to promote labor and
                  environmental standards. Rep. Charles Rangel
                  (D-NY), the ranking Democrat on the Committee, also condemned
                  the bill. He accused Republicans of being partisan in a time
                  of national crisis. He then offered a substitute amendment,
                  which was sponsored only by Democrats. It was rejected.
                   
                  The meeting, which was scheduled to start at 5:00 PM,
                  started late, broke for several floor votes, and finally
                  concluded over four hours later. The USTR, Robert Zoellick,
                  was present to answer technical questions about the bill.
                  However, much of the time was taken up in substantive debate
                  between Zoellick, who supports the bill, and some of the
                  Democrats on the Committee who oppose the bill. The two
                  Democrats on the Committee who voted for the bill were Rep. William Jefferson
                  (D-LA) and Rep. John
                  Tanner (D-TN). | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | TPA Bill Sets IPR and
                  E-Commerce Objectives | 
               
              
                10/9. HR 3005, the Bipartisan Trade Promotion Authority Act
                  of 2001, which was approved by the House Ways and Means
                  Committee on October 9, also sets detailed objectives for the
                  President to meet regarding intellectual property rights (IPR)
                  and electronic commerce.
                   
                  HR 3005, at § 2(b)(4), provides that the "principal
                  trade negotiating objectives" of the President shall
                  include intellectual property. This section states, in part,
                  that "The principal negotiating objectives of the United
                  States regarding trade-related intellectual property are (A)
                  to further promote adequate and effective protection of
                  intellectual property rights, including through (i)(I)
                  ensuring accelerated and full implementation of the Agreement
                  on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights
                  ..."
                   
                  This section also sets as objectives "providing strong
                  protection for new and emerging technologies and new methods
                  of transmitting and distributing products embodying
                  intellectual property" and "ensuring that standards
                  of protection and enforcement keep pace with technological
                  developments, and in particular ensuring that rightholders
                  have the legal and technological means to control the use of
                  their works through the Internet and other global
                  communication media, and to prevent the unauthorized use of
                  their works".
                   
                  Similarly, § 2(b)(8) provides that the "principal
                  negotiating objectives of the United States with respect to
                  electronic commerce are (A) to ensure that current
                  obligations, rules, disciplines, and commitments under the
                  World Trade Organization apply to electronic commerce; (B) to
                  ensure that (i) electronically delivered goods and services
                  receive no less favorable treatment under trade rules and
                  commitments than like products delivered in physical form; and
                  (ii) the classification of such goods and services ensures the
                  most liberal trade treatment possible; (C) to ensure that
                  governments refrain from implementing trade-related measures
                  that impede electronic commerce; (D) where legitimate policy
                  objectives require domestic regulations that affect electronic
                  commerce, to obtain commitments that any such regulations are
                  the least restrictive on trade, nondiscriminatory, and
                  transparent, and promote an open market environment; and (E)
                  to extend the moratorium of the World Trade Organization on
                  duties on electronic transmissions."
                   
                  These provisions were the subject of very little debate or
                  discussion at the Committee mark up meeting. There was some
                  discussion of IPR. This was mostly regarding patent protection
                  in the context of pharmaceuticals. However, Rep. Sander Levin
                  (D-MI) also stated that "we are imposing" on other
                  countries by requiring them to comply with TRIPS. USTR Robert
                  Zoellick responded bluntly: "we object to people stealing
                  property." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Rules Committee Adopts Rule
                  for Distance Education Bill | 
               
              
                10/9. The House Rules
                  Committee adopted a modified closed rule for
                  consideration of HR
                  1992, the Internet Equity and Education Act of 2001. This
                  bill would make it easier to obtain student loans for Internet
                  based education, and other distance learning. The bill is
                  sponsored by Rep.
                  Johnny Isakson (R-GA).
                   
                  This rule allows for one hour of debate in the House equally
                  divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority
                  member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce. It
                  also allows Rep. Patsy
                  Mink (D-HI) to offer her amendment
                  in the nature of a substitute [PDF].
                   
                  The bill would remove the burden of the "12-hour
                  rule" for non-traditional programs. This rule requires
                  educational institutions to keep voluminous attendance records
                  to demonstrate that their students attended certain types of
                  work sessions. The bill also makes exceptions to the 50%
                  requirement by allowing a limited number of institutions to
                  offer more than 50 % of their courses by telecommunications,
                  or to serve more than 50 % of their students through
                  telecommunications courses. The bill also addresses incentive
                  compensation provisions. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Supreme Court Denies
                  Certiorari in Microsoft Case | 
               
              
                | 10/9. The Supreme
                  Court of the United States denied, without opinion,
                  Microsoft's petition for writ of certiorari in the antitrust
                  case brought against it by the government. See, Order
                  List [PDF] at page 4. The Department of Justice issued a release
                  which quoted a spokesman as saying, "We're pleased with
                  the Court's decision. We'll continue our progress in the
                  District Court." (SCUS No. 01-236, Microsoft Corporation
                  v. United States, et al.) | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | House and Senate Set to
                  Vote on Anti Terrorism Bills | 
               
              
                10/9. Neither the House nor the Senate passed their versions
                  of the anti terrorism bill on Tuesday. However, both bodies
                  are poised to take up the bills this week. Senate Majority
                  Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) sought unanimous agreement on
                  Tuesday to proceed to a vote on the USA Act without debate or
                  amendments. However, Sen.
                  Russ Feingold (D-WI) objected.
                   
                  The House bill is HR 2975, titled the PATRIOT Act. See, HTML
                  version in the Library of Congress web site, and PDF
                  version in the CDT web
                  site. (However, both of these lack the amendments adopted by
                  the House Judiciary
                  Committee on October 3.) The Senate bill is S 1510, titled
                  the USA Act. See, HTML
                  version in the Library of Congress web site, and PDF version in Sen. Patrick Leahy's
                  (D-VT) web site. See also, Sen. Leahy's summary
                  [PDF] of the bill.
                   
                  Both bills contain many provisions that would increase the
                  ability of law enforcement, intelligence, and other government
                  agencies to combat terrorism, including expanded authority to
                  conduct electronic surveillance of phone and Internet
                  communications. Both bills have broad bipartisan support. The
                  Bush Administration favors the Senate bill, in part because it
                  lacks the two year sunset provision contained in the House
                  bill. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Gov. Davis Vetoes E-Mail
                  Monitoring Bill | 
               
              
                10/9. California Gov. Gray Davis vetoed Senate
                  Bill 147, sponsored by Sen. Debra
                  Bowen (D-Marina del Rey). This bill would prohibit an
                  employer from secretly monitoring the electronic mail or other
                  computer records generated by an employee.
                   
                  Gov. Davis stated that "This bill would require
                  employers, by March 1, 2002, to execute signed or
                  electronically verifiable agreements between an employer and
                  employees regarding the right of the employer to monitor the
                  e-mail traffic and computer files of employees. If such
                  agreements are not provided, the bill prohibits employers from
                  monitoring business computers by employees to guard against
                  inappropriate business or personal uses."
                   
                  He continued that "Under current law, employers are
                  potentially liable if the employer's agents or employees use
                  the employer's computers for improper purposes, such as sexual
                  harassment, defamation and the like. It therefore follows that
                  any employer has a legitimate need to monitor, either on a
                  spot basis or at regular intervals, such company property,
                  including e-mail traffic and computer files stored on either
                  employer owned hard drives, diskettes or CD ROMs."
                   
                  Gov. Davis concluded in his veto statement that "This
                  bill places unnecessary and complicating obligations on
                  employers and may likely to lead to litigation by affected
                  employees over whether the required notice was provided and
                  whether it was read and understood by the employee." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Covad Rebuts Intel and PFF
                  on Broadband Deployment | 
               
              
                10/9. October 9 was the deadline to file reply comments with
                  the FCC in its
                  third inquiry into whether advanced telecommunications
                  capability is being deployed to all Americans in a reasonable
                  and timely fashion, pursuant to Section
                  706 of the Telecom Act of 1996. Covad submitted a reply
                  comment [PDF] which criticized comments submitted by Intel, the Progress and Freedom Foundation
                  (PFF), and Bell companies regarding broadband deployment.
                   
                  On September 24, Intel submitted a comment
                  [PDF] in which it stated that "current regulations are
                  unnecessarily undermining the reasonable and timely deployment
                  of broadband". It stated that the FCC "should begin
                  a comprehensive Section 706 rulemaking to review the
                  regulations that apply to all broadband providers." Intel
                  concluded that "the Commission should tentatively propose
                  deregulating all new, last mile broadband investment to
                  encourage the fastest possible deployment of the highest speed
                  technology. For example, it is premature to require cable
                  companies to make their cable modem facilities available to
                  unaffiliated ISPs at regulated rates. Similarly, new last mile
                  DSL investment should not be encumbered by excessive
                  regulation."
                   
                  See also, comment
                  [PDF] submitted by the PFF on September 24. The PFF also
                  submitted a reply
                  [PDF] on October 9 to its original comments.
                   
                  Covad wrote in response that "To preserve competition,
                  and to retain invaluable competitive pressures on broadband
                  deployment, the Commission should not adopt the proposals of
                  the BOCs, Intel, and PFF. It can, however, take concrete steps
                  to further the goals of Congress by acting on the petition to
                  adopt concrete federal rules for UNE provisioning that will
                  allow facilities- based CLECs to continue to offer customers a
                  real choice in broadband services. It has been five years
                  since the Act was passed, and the BOCs still do not provide
                  parity treatment to their CLEC wholesale customers. Adopting
                  real provisioning rules, and associated self-executing
                  penalties, will give CLECs and consumers the equitable
                  treatment Congress envisioned."
                   
                  This FCC notice of inquiry was adopted by the FCC at its
                  August 9, 2001, meeting. See, Aug.
                  9 FCC release. See also, notice
                  in Federal Register, August 24, 2001, Vol. 66, No. 165, at
                  Page 44636. (CC Docket No. 98-146.) | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | FBI Files Affidavit
                  Regarding Key Logger System | 
               
              
                10/4. An FBI agent filed an affidavit
                  [PDF] with the U.S.
                  District Court (DNJ) in USA v. Nicodemo Scarfo.
                  As a part of its criminal investigation, the FBI
                  surreptitiously installed on Scarfo's personal computer its
                  "Key Logger System" to record the keystroke entry of
                  his encryption passphrase. Scarfo now seeks to suppress
                  evidence gathered as a result of this.
                   
                  Nicodemo Scarfo is an encryption savvy mobster involved in
                  illegal gambling and loan sharking operations. Previously, the
                  FBI obtained court authority to surreptitiously install on
                  Scarfo's computer "recovery methods" that could
                  capture password and encryption key information. The Court
                  order stated: "IT IS ORDERED ... that Special Agents of
                  the F.B.I. ... deploy recovery methods which will capture the
                  necessary key related information and encrypted file(s) ...
                  that Special Agents of the F.B.I. ... be authorized to enter
                  the TARGET LOCATION surreptitiously, covertly, and by breaking
                  and entering, if necessary, in order to deploy recovery
                  methods which will capture the necessary key related
                  information and encrypted file(s) whether they are stored on
                  Nicodemo S. Scarfo's computer hard drive in the TARGET
                  LOCATION or on removable media."
                   
                  The Electronic Privacy
                  Information Center (EPIC) has collected and published case
                  documents from this proceeding. See, index. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | More News | 
               
              
                10/9. The Recording Industry
                  Association of America (RIAA) released a one page report
                  [PDF] titled "2001 Mid Year Anti-Piracy Statistics".
                  See also, RIAA
                  release.
                   
                  10/9. The National Music
                  Publishers' Association (NMPA), The Harry Fox Agency (HFA)
                  and the Recording Industry
                  Association of America (RIAA) announced that they reached
                  an agreement on the licensing of musical works for new
                  subscription services on the Internet. See, RIAA release.
                   
                  10/9. California Gov. Gray Davis vetoed Assembly
                  Bill 148, sponsored by Assembly Member Charlene Zettel
                  (R-Poway). Gov. Davis stated that "This bill would have
                  required a study to determine the cost and the most
                  cost-effective means of providing Internet access to every
                  middle and junior high school. While I am most supportive of
                  technology in schools, AB 148's study is duplicative of
                  existing and very current information." | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Bush Names Special Advisor
                  for Cyberspace Security | 
               
              
                | 10/9. President Bush picked Richard Clarke to be the
                  President's Special Advisor for Cyberspace Security. He will
                  report to Thomas Ridge, the Assistant to the President for
                  Homeland Security, and to Condi Rice, the Assistant to the
                  President for National Security Affairs. Clarke was Deputy
                  Assistant Secretary of State for Intelligence under President
                  Reagan. He was also Assistant Secretary of State for Political
                  Military Affairs under the elder President Bush. In May 1998,
                  he was appointed National Coordinator for Security,
                  Infrastructure Protection, and Counter Terrorism. See also, White
                  House release and transcript
                  of event announcing Clarke appointment. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Wednesday, Oct 10. | 
               
              
                POSTPONED. 9:00
                  AM - 3:30 PM. The Federal
                  Communications Commission (FCC) will hold a Public Forum
                  and Technology Expo on telecommunications relay services (TRS).
                  TRS, which is required by Title IV of the Americans with
                  Disabilities Act (Section 225 of the Communications Act of
                  1934), pertains to services for hearing impaired persons.
                  Location: Commission Meeting Room, Room TW-C305 and adjacent
                  rooms, 445 12th St., SW, Washington DC. See, FCC
                  notice and agenda [MS Word]. See also, notice
                  in Federal Register, August 28, 2001, Vol. 66, No. 167, at
                  Pages 45310 - 45312.
                   
                  10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The House Science Committee
                  will hold a hearing titled "Cyber Security – How Can We
                  Protect American Computer Networks From Attack?"
                  Location: 2318 Rayburn Building.
                   
                  POSTPONED. 10:00
                  AM. The Senate
                  Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Administrative
                  Oversight and the Courts will hold a hearing to examine new
                  priorities and challenges for the FBI. Sen. Charles Schumer
                  (D-NY) will preside. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
                   
                  The Supreme Court of
                  the United States will hear oral argument in Verizon v.
                  FCC (00-511), WorldCom v. Verizon (00-555), FCC v. Iowa
                  Utilities Board (00-587), AT&T v. Iowa Utilities Board
                  (00-590), and General Communications v. Iowa Utilities Board
                  (00-602), consolidates. There will be 90 minutes for argument.
                   
                  12:00 NOON - 1:30 PM. The Federal
                  Communications Bar Association's (FCBA) International
                  Practice Committee will host a brown bag lunch titled
                  "Survey of Issues Facing the International Bureau."
                  The speaker will be Donald Abelson, Chief of the FCC's
                  International Bureau.
                   
                  2:00 PM. The House
                  Judiciary Committee will hold a meeting to mark up several
                  bills, including HR
                  1408, the Financial Services Antifraud Network Act of 2001
                  and HR
                  1552, the Internet Tax Nondiscrimination Act.
                  Location: Room 2141, Rayburn Building.
                   
                  POSTPONED. 2:00
                  PM. FCC Chairman Michael Powell will hold an informal press
                  conference with reporters who cover the FCC. Location: FCC
                  Meeting Room, 12th Street Level, 445 12th Street SW,
                  Washington DC. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Thursday, Oct 11 | 
               
              
                9:30 AM. The FCC will hold a meeting. Location:
                  Commission Meeting Room, FCC, 445 12th Street, SW, Room
                  TWC305, Washington DC.
                   
                  9:30 AM. The House
                  Finance Committee will hold a meeting to mark up HR 3004,
                  the Financial Anti Terrorism Act of 2001. Location: Room 2128,
                  Rayburn Building.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The Senate
                  Judiciary Committee will hold an business meeting to
                  consider pending calendar business. Location: Room 226,
                  Dirksen Building.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The House
                  Judiciary Committee will hold an oversight hearing titled
                  "Using Information Technology to Secure America's
                  Borders: INS Problems with Planning and Implementation."
                  Location: Room 2141, Rayburn House Office Building. 12:00
                  NOON. The Federal
                  Communications Bar Association (FCBA) will host a luncheon
                  titled "Competition in Japan's Telecommunications
                  Sector." The speaker will be Shogo Itoda, Commissioner,
                  Japan Fair Trade Commission. RSVP to DC Bar Sections Office at
                  202-626-3463. The price is $25 for FCBA members. Location:
                  Arnold & Porter, Paul Porter Room, 10th Floor, 555 12th
                  Street, NW, Washington DC.
                   
                  2:00 PM. The Senate
                  Judiciary Committee will hold hearings to examine homeland
                  defense matters. Location: Room 226, Dirksen Building.
                   
                  4:15 PM. FTC Commissioner Thomas Leary will speak at
                  the Transatlantic Business Dialogue on "Regulatory Policy
                  Networked Economy." Location: Folger's Shakespeare
                  Library, 201 East Capitol Street, SE, Old Reading Room,
                  Washington DC.
                   
                  6:00 - 8:00 PM. The Federal
                  Communications Bar Association (FCBA) will host a
                  reception featuring David Gross, Deputy Assistant
                  Secretary of State for Communications and Information Policy,
                  and Nancy Victory, head of the NTIA. The price of
                  admission is $35 for private sector members and $20 for
                  government or students. RSVP to Wendy Parish at fcba@fcba.org by Tuesday,
                  October 9, at 10:00 AM. Location: Capital Hilton Hotel, 16th
                  & K Streets, NW, Washington DC.
                   
                  Deadline to submit comments to the FCC in its rule making
                  proceeding regarding locating spectrum bands below 3 Ghz for
                  possible reallocation for Third Generation (3G)
                  wireless services, and for other purposes. (ET Docket Nos.
                  00-258 and 95-18 and IB Docket No. 99-81.) See, notice
                  in Federal Register.
                   
                  Deadline to submit comments to the FCC in its rule making
                  proceeding regarding permitting Mobile Satellite Service (MSS)
                  operators flexibility to use their spectrum for land based
                  transmitters. (IB Docket No. 01-185, ET Docket No. 95-18.)
                  See, notice
                  in Federal Register. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Friday, Oct 12 | 
               
              
                9:30 AM. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit will
                  hear oral argument in U.S. Telecom Association v. FBI,
                  No. 00-5386. Judges Ginsburg, Williams and Henderson will
                  preside. Location: 333 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington DC.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The The Senate
                  Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Technology,
                  Terrorism, and Government Information will hold a hearing to
                  examine the role of technology in preventing the entry of
                  terrorists into the United States. Location: Room 226, Dirksen
                  Building. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | People and Appointments | 
               
              
                10/9. The SEC announced
                  that Commissioner Laura Unger plans to leave the SEC
                  "this fall". See, SEC release.
                   
                  10/9. Nancy Victory, head of the NTIA,
                  named people to fill several top positions. Michael
                  Gallagher will be Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce
                  for Communications and Information starting on November 2. He
                  previously worked for Verizon Wireless. William Bailey
                  will be NTIA Senior Advisor starting on October 11. He
                  previously worked for Coreexpress. Stephen Madden will
                  be NTIA Special Assistant starting on October 10. He
                  previously worked for the Department of Agriculture. See, NTIA
                  release.
                   
                  10/9. The U.S. Telecom
                  Association (USTA) elected Arne Haynes, President
                  and General Manager of the Rainier Group in Eatonville,
                  Washington, to be Chairman of the Board for a term of one
                  year. See, USTA
                  release.
                   
                  10/9. President Bush nominated Julia Gibbons to be U.S.
                  Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit and William Steele
                  to be a U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eleventh Circuit. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal is a free access web site and e-mail alert
                  that provides news, records, and analysis of legislation,
                  litigation, and regulation affecting the computer and Internet
                  industry. This e-mail service is offered free of charge to
                  anyone who requests it. Just provide TLJ an e-mail address. 
                   
                  Number of subscribers: 2,151. 
                  Contact: 202-364-8882; E-mail. 
                  P.O. Box 15186, Washington DC, 20003. 
                  Privacy
                  Policy 
                  Notices
                  & Disclaimers 
                  Copyright 1998 - 2001 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     |