| Sen. Wyden Proposes NET
                  Guard | 
               
              
                9/26. Sen. Ron Wyden
                  (D-OR) proposed forming an National Emergency Technology Guard
                  during a speech in the Senate. Sen. Wyden is a member of the Senate Commerce
                  Committee, and Chairman of its Science, Technology, and
                  Space Subcommittee.
                   
                  He stated that "It seems to me that what this country
                  needs is essentially a technology equivalent of the National
                  Guard, an emergency technology guard -- I have been calling it
                  in my mind Net Guard, or a national emergency technology guard
                  -- that in times of crisis would be in a position to mobilize
                  the Nation's information technology, or IT, community to
                  action quickly, just as the National Guard is ready to move
                  during emergencies."
                   
                  He elaborated that "A national volunteer organization of
                  trained and well-coordinated units of information technology
                  professionals from our leading technology companies ought to
                  be in a position to stand at ready with the designated
                  computer equipment, satellite dishes, wireless communicators,
                  and other equipment to quickly recreate and repair compromised
                  communications and technology infrastructure."
                   
                  He also stated that "I intend to use the subcommittee
                  that I chair of the full Commerce Committee that is chaired by
                  Senator Hollings to initiate a dialog among congressional,
                  corporate, military, and nonprofit leaders to begin a new
                  effort to mobilize information technology in times of
                  crises." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Federal Circuit Reverses in
                  Loral v. Matsushita | 
               
              
                9/21. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (FedCir) issued its opinion in Loral
                  Fairchild v. Matsushita Electrical, a patent
                  infringement case involving invalidity for obviousness.
                   
                  Loral filed a complaint in U.S. District Court (EDNY)
                  against Japanese electronics manufacturers and their U.S.
                  distributors alleging infringement of claim 1 of its U.S.
                  Patent No. 3,931,674, titled "Self aligned CCD
                  element including two levels of electrodes and method of
                  manufacture therefor". CCDs, or charge-coupled devices,
                  are used in electronic cameras to produce an electrical signal
                  representing the image that is focused in it, which signal is
                  then processed and displayed on a video monitor.
                   
                  Defendants moved for summary judgment on the grounds that
                  claim 1 is invalid as obvious for having been disclosed in a
                  journal article authored by Darrel Erb in 1973. The District
                  Court held that there was no genuine issue as to the status of
                  the Erb reference as prior art, and that claim 1 was obvious
                  in light of it.
                   
                  The Appeals Court held that the grant of summary judgment was
                  improper because the evidence raised a genuine issue as to
                  whether those at Loral reduced the claimed invention to
                  practice prior to the publication of the Erb article. It
                  reversed and remanded. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Copyright Office Extends
                  Deadline | 
               
              
                | 9/27. The Copyright
                  Office (CO) extended its deadline to submit comments on
                  its proposed amendments to the regulations governing the
                  content and service of certain notices on the copyright owner
                  of a musical work. The notice is served or filed by a person
                  who intends to use the work to make and distribute
                  phonorecords, including by means of digital phonorecord
                  deliveries, under a compulsory license, pursuant to 17 U.S.C.
                  § 115. The new deadline is October 12. See, original notice
                  in Federal Register, August 28, 2001, Vol. 66, No. 167, Page
                  45241 - 45245. See also, notice
                  extending deadline, in Federal Register, Thursday, September
                  27, Vol. 66, No. 188. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal is a free access web site and e-mail alert
                  that provides news, records, and analysis of legislation,
                  litigation, and regulation affecting the computer and Internet
                  industry. This e-mail service is offered free of charge to
                  anyone who requests it. Just provide TLJ an e-mail address. 
                   
                  Number of subscribers: 2,097. 
                  Contact: 202-364-8882; E-mail. 
                  P.O. Box 15186, Washington DC, 20003. 
                  Privacy
                  Policy 
                  Notices
                  & Disclaimers 
                  Copyright 1998 - 2001 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Bush Addresses Anti
                  Terrorism Bill | 
               
              
                9/27. President Bush gave a speech
                  at the CIA Headquarters in
                  Langley, Virginia, in which he referenced the Administration's
                  Anti
                  Terrorism Act of 2001 [PDF]. The bill would increase the
                  electronic surveillance authority of law enforcement and
                  intelligence agencies, among other things. Bush and Attorney
                  General John Ashcroft seek passage of the bill on an expedited
                  basis.
                   
                  Bush stated: "I intend to continue to work with Congress
                  to make sure that our law enforcement officials at home have
                  got the tools necessary -- obviously, within the confines of
                  our Constitution -- to make sure the homeland is secure;
                  to make sure America can live as peacefully as possible; to
                  make sure that we run down every threat, take serious every
                  incident. And we've got to make sure, as well, that those
                  who work for the nation overseas have got the best available
                  technologies and the best tools and the best funding
                  possible." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Fed Circuit Rules in BTG v.
                  Genentech | 
               
              
                9/27. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (FedCir) issued its opinion
                  in Bio-Technology
                  General v. Genentech, a patent infringement
                  case involving the issue of lack of enablement.
                   
                  Genentech is the
                  assignee of U.S.
                  Patent No. 4,601,980, titled "Microbial expression of
                  a gene for human growth hormone". The jury answered
                  "NO" to the question "Has BTG proven by clear
                  and convincing evidence that the '980 patent did not enable a
                  scientist skilled in the art in July 1979 to make any mature
                  human growth hormone of 191 amino acids?" Nevertheless,
                  the District Court granted BTG's motion for judgment as a
                  matter of law that the patent is invalid for lack of
                  enablement. The Appeals Court reversed the judgment of
                  invalidity and remanded for further proceedings with respect
                  to infringement. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | 7th Circuit Rules in
                  Trademark Case | 
               
              
                9/27. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (7thCir) issued its opinion
                  in Packman
                  v. Chicago Tribune, a trademark and unfair
                  competition case.
                   
                  Diana Packman holds federal and Illinois trademarks for the
                  phrase "the joy of six," for use in relation to
                  football and basketball games. The Chicago Tribune published a
                  newspaper that ran front page headlines with the phrase
                  "The Joy of Six". Front Page News produced t-shirts
                  that reproduced this front page. Packman filed a complaint in
                  U.S. District Court against the Chicago Tribune and Front Page
                  News alleging trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114,
                  unfair competition under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and trademark
                  infringement under Illinois law, in connection with the
                  reproduction of the Chicago Tribune front page on t-shirts.
                  The District Court granted defendants' motion for summary
                  judgment on the grounds of fair use, and absence of a
                  likelihood of confusion of products. The Appeals Court
                  affirmed. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | 7th Circuit Reverses in
                  Goss Graphics v. DEV | 
               
              
                9/27. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (7thCir) issued its opinion
                  in Goss
                  Graphics v. DEV Industries, a theft of trade
                  secrets case. However, the issue on appeal involved dismissal
                  of suits, with leave to reinstate, on the grounds that they
                  are likely to settle. In this case, the District Court
                  dismissed the case, and later refused to reinstate after the
                  failure of settlement negotiations. The Appeals Court
                  reversed.
                   
                  Judge Posner wrote that "We have repeatedly criticized
                  the practice of dismissing suits before they have been
                  concluded, with leave to reinstate the suit." He
                  continued that "the district judge's annoyance at the
                  parties' failure to settle was not a valid ground for killing
                  the plaintiff's suit. Federal courts do have authority to
                  require parties to engage in settlement negotiations ... but
                  they have no authority to force a settlement. ... If parties
                  want to duke it out, that's their privilege." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          | 
            
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Friday, Sept 28 | 
               
              
                There will be no votes in the House. The Senate will meet in
                  pro forma session only.
                   
                  CANCELLED. 10:00
                  AM - 12:00 NOON. The FCC's WRC-03 Advisory Committee will hold
                  a meeting to continue preparations for the 2003 World
                  Radiocommunication Conference. Location: Federal
                  Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Room TW-C305,
                  Washington DC. See, notice
                  in Federal Register, September 7, 2001, Vol. 66, No. 174, at
                  Pages 46793 - 46794.
                   
                  Extended deadline for submitting comments and notices of
                  intent to participate in a copyright arbitration royalty panel
                  proceeding to the Copyright
                  Office regarding its proposed regulations that will govern
                  the Recording Industry
                  Association of America (RIAA) collective when it functions
                  as the designated agent receiving royalty payments and
                  statements of accounts from nonexempt, subscription digital
                  transmission services which make digital transmissions of
                  sound recordings, pursuant to 17 U.S.C.
                  § 114. See, notice
                  [PDF] in Federal Register, September 21, 2001, Vol. 66, No.
                  184, at page 48648.
                   
                  Deadline to submit rebuttal comments to the USTR in its
                  investigation of the intellectual property laws and practices
                  of the government of Ukraine. See, notice
                  in Federal Register, September 24, 2001, Vol. 66, No. 185, at
                  Page 48898. Location: Office of the USTR, 1724 F Street, NW,
                  Rooms 1 and 2, Washington DC. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Monday, October 1 | 
               
              
                The House will not be in session.
                   
                  9:30 AM. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit will
                  hear oral argument in AT&T Wireless Services v. FCC,
                  No. 00-1304. Judges Edwards, Rogers and Tatel will preside.
                  Location: 333 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington DC.
                   
                  2:00 PM. Timothy Muris, Chairman of the FTC,
                  and lawyers and investigators from FTC's Bureau of Consumer
                  Protection will hold a press conference to announce an
                  Internet fraud enforcement initiative. Location: FTC Internet
                  lab, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington DC. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Tuesday, October 2 | 
               
              
                The House will meet at 12:30 PM for morning hour, and at
                  2:00 PM for legislative business. There may be votes after
                  6:00 PM on bills considered under suspension of the rules.
                   
                  The Supreme Court of
                  the United States will hear oral argument in NCTA v.
                  Gulf Power (No. 00-832) and FCC v. Gulf Power (No.
                  00-843), consolidated. See, calendar
                  [PDF].
                   
                  10:00 AM. The Senate
                  Banking Committee will hold an oversight hearings to
                  examine the activities of the Trade Promotion Coordinating
                  Committee. The scheduled witnesses are Donald Evans (Secretary
                  of Commerce), John Robson (P/Ch of the Export-Import Bank),
                  Hector Barreto (Administrator of the SBA), Peter Watson (P/CEO
                  of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation), and Thelma
                  Askey (Director of the U.S. Trade and Development Agency).
                  Location: Room 538, Dirksen Building.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The Senate
                  Judiciary Committee will continue its hearing on homeland
                  defense matters. (This hearing began on September 25. Attorney
                  General John Ashcroft testified regarding the
                  Administration's Anti Terrorism Act of 2001.) Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
                  will preside. Location: Room 216, Hart Building.
                   
                  12:00 NOON. The Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory
                  Committee will host a panel discussion on electronic
                  surveillance issues. Lunch will be served. RSVP to Megan
                  Kinnaird or Catherine Parsons at 202-638-4370. Location:
                  Reserve Officers Association, One Constitution Ave, NE,
                  Washington DC. The speakers will be Viet Dinh (Assistant
                  Attorney General for Legal Policy), John Podesta (Georgetown
                  University), James Dempsey (Center for Democracy and
                  Technology), and Bruce Heiman (Preston Gates Ellis &
                  Rouvelas Meeds). | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          | 
            
           | 
         
       
     |