| Senate Holds Hearing on 3G
                  and Spectrum Management | 
               
              
                7/31. The Senate
                  Commerce Committee's Communications Subcommittee held a
                  hearing on spectrum management and third generation
                  wireless systems. This next generation of wireless
                  communications technology is intended, among other things, to
                  bring broadband Internet access to portable devices.
                  However, a significant amount of spectrum will have to be
                  allocated for use by 3G systems. There is not enough suitable
                  unused spectrum. Hence, spectrum allocated to other users
                  would have to be shared or reallocated.
                   
                  Several bands have been identified for possible use by 3G
                  systems. The incumbent users of this spectrum, including the
                  Department of Defense (DOD) and ITFS users, such as schools
                  and churches, have adamantly opposed reallocation of spectrum
                  that they use. As a result, in the year since former President
                  Clinton made reallocation of spectrum for 3G use a major
                  policy goal, the agencies responsible for spectrum management,
                  the NTIA and FCC, have held meetings, issued reports, and
                  received comments, but made very little progress towards
                  making any spectrum available for 3G uses. Now, the Congress
                  has stepped in.
                   
                  The Subcommittee heard testimony that paralleled a similar
                  hearing before the House Telecom Subcommittee last week, and
                  numerous other events in the last year. The spectrum managers
                  testify that spectrum is a nationalized resource; they license
                  its use in the public interest; and, they are working with
                  interested parties to locate spectrum for possible sharing or
                  reallocation. And, they testified to the Senate Communications
                  Subcommittee, they are still looking. The incumbent licensees
                  testify that the spectrum licensed to them cannot be
                  reassigned without causing grievous harm to national security,
                  education, rural communications, or other sacred services.
                  Finally, the communications companies that wish to develop 3G
                  ask for spectrum to be reallocated.
                   
                  Several Senators suggested that one problem is that incumbent
                  users have no incentive to more efficiently use spectrum
                  licensed to them, or to relocate to other bands. Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK)
                  used the hearing to explore a possible solution that is
                  specific to incumbent use by the DOD in the 1755 to 1850 MHz
                  band. He suggested that proceeds from the reauction of this
                  spectrum might go directly to the DOD.
                   
                  Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR)
                  suggested broader reform of the spectrum regime. He stated in
                  opening that "It seems to me that the central problem ...
                  is that we have got a Jurassic system. It is virtually
                  unchanged since the 1920s when spectrum was used for radio and
                  radio only, and it is creating all of the wrong incentives.
                  There is incumbent license holders who want to keep licenses
                  scarce, so they occupy as much spectrum as possible. They
                  fight tooth and nail against giving any out -- in effect, sort
                  of, collect ransom for holding the spectrum hostage. And if
                  you have got a bright new idea that needs spectrum, you better
                  have a lot of patience for a lot of red tape. It seems to me
                  that we have got a variety of reforms that we ought to be
                  looking at. To me, one of the centerpieces of that effort
                  ought to be to make sure that licensees in the future need to
                  have some flexibility incentives to sell or lease excess
                  spectrum, instead of hoarding it."
                   
                  Sen. Wyden later added that "we have insufficient
                  financial incentives for the development of creative
                  technologies that improve efficiency". He continued that
                  the way things are going, "we are going to have a
                  proceeding. We will have another proceeding. Have another
                  proceeding. And a motion for a proceeding. And my sense is
                  that at the end of three or five years, if we don't speed this
                  up, and inject some real marketplace forces, the world isn't
                  going to look all that much different on the civilian
                  side." He concluded that we need "to retool the
                  system ... the system is the problem ... a dinosaur ... it is
                  a system skewed away from innovation."
                   
                  Sen. Conrad Burns
                  (R-MT) suggested that reforming spectrum management would be
                  more complicated than passing the Telecom Act of 1996.
                   
                  See, prepared testimony in PDF of government spectrum
                  managers: William
                  Hatch (National Telecommunications and Information
                  Administration) and Julius
                  Knapp (FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology). See
                  also, prepared testimony of incumbent users of spectrum
                  identified for possible reallocation for 3G systems: Linton
                  Wells (DOD) and Carroll
                  McHenry (Nucentrix Broadband Networks). See also, prepared
                  testimony by prospective 3G service providers: Denny
                  Strigl (Verizon Wireless), Mark
                  Kelly (Leap Wireless), Martin
                  Cooper (ArrayComm), and Thomas
                  Wheeler (CTIA). | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Technology, Privacy, and
                  Red Light Cameras | 
               
              
                | 7/31. The House
                  Transportation Committee's Highways and Transit
                  Subcommittee held a hearing on red light cameras. See, prepared
                  testimony of Rep. Dick Armey (R-TX). He stated that
                  "Technology can be a tool of freedom. Communication
                  advances like the Internet, for instance, have broken down
                  barriers and spread the message of democracy around the globe.
                  Unfortunately, technology can sometimes serve the opposite
                  effect. New technologies can actually undermine our freedoms
                  and create problems far greater than those they are meant to
                  solve. For years the federal government has spent millions of
                  dollars promoting photo enforcement systems and helping local
                  jurisdictions install them." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | 2nd Circuit Affirms Net
                  Gambling Conviction | 
               
              
                7/31. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (2ndCir) issued its opinion
                  in USA
                  v. Cohen, a criminal case involving Internet
                  gambling. Jay Cohen was charged by indictment with eight
                  counts of violation of the Wire Wager Act in connection with
                  his operation of an Antigua based gambling business that
                  advertised in, and took bets from, the U.S. over the Internet.
                  A trial jury of the U.S. District Court (SDNY)
                  convicted him on all eight counts. The Court of Appeals
                  affirmed.
                   
                  18 U.S.C. § 1084 provides, in part, that "Whoever being
                  engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses
                  a wire communication facility for the transmission in
                  interstate or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or
                  information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers on any
                  sporting event or contest, or for the transmission of a wire
                  communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or
                  credit as a result of bets or wagers, or for information
                  assisting in the placing of bets or wagers, shall be fined
                  under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or
                  both." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | People and Appointments | 
               
              
                7/31. The Senate
                  Judiciary Committee completed two days of hearings on the
                  nomination of Robert Mueller to be Director of the
                  Federal Bureau of Investigation.
                   
                  7/31. The Senate
                  Finance Committee held a hearing on several pending
                  nominations, including Rosario Marin to be Treasurer of
                  the United States and Jon Huntsman to be a Deputy U.S.
                  Trade Representative. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | House Delays Votes on Trade
                  Promotion Authority and Bell Relief | 
               
              
                7/31. The House, which will likely break for its traditional
                  summer recess at the end of this week, has delayed
                  consideration of several major bills. The House will not vote
                  on either trade promotion authority (also known as fast track)
                  or the Tauzin Dingell bill, at least until September.
                   
                  The Tauzin Dingell bill, which would provide regulatory relief
                  to the Bell companies, was reported by the House Commerce
                  Committee on May 9. It was reported unfavorably by the House
                  Judiciary Committee on June 13. Supporters had sought to move
                  it quickly to the House floor. The U.S. Telecommunications
                  Association, which represents the Bell companies, issued a
                  release
                  praising this latest development.
                   
                  Meanwhile, the Information
                  Technology Association of America (ITAA) issued a release
                  condemning a bill in the Senate that would provide regulatory
                  relief to the Bells. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | House Passes Jordan FTA
                  Bill | 
               
              
                | 7/31.The House passed HR 2603, a bill to implement the U.S.
                  Jordan Free Trade Agreement. There is little trade between the
                  U.S. and Jordan. However, the FTA includes language pertaining
                  to labor and the environment, as well as e-commerce and
                  intellectual property, that may serve as a precedents for
                  future free trade agreements. The labor and environmental
                  provisions were controversial. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Colin Powell Wants China to
                  Take Advantage of Information Technology | 
               
              
                | 7/28. Secretary of State Colin Powell was interviewed on
                  CCTV, the PR China's state television. He stated that "We
                  need no enemies, we want no enemies, we want to help people.
                  We want to help China and we want to help China take advantage
                  of the new 21st Century world of information technology,
                  access to international markets. Trade with us, let American
                  products come here -- Chinese products come to the United
                  States." See, transcript. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | House Holds Hearing on FASB
                  Rules for Combinations of Businesses | 
               
              
                7/31. The House
                  Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and
                  Consumer Protection held a hearing titled Current Issues
                  Before the Financial Accounting Standards Board. During
                  the last Congress the FASB
                  and some Members of Congress clashed over accounting standards
                  for combinations of businesses. Some members argued that FASB
                  proposals to eliminate the pooling of interests method would
                  have treated mergers of high tech companies unfairly and
                  unrealistically. The FASB revised its position on July 20,
                  2001. Members of the Subcommittee expressed satisfaction at
                  the July 31 hearing.
                   
                  The FASB had proposed requiring that all mergers be viewed,
                  not as the melding of separate entities, but as a direct
                  purchase, requiring companies to accept the purchase method of
                  accounting. The rules at the time permitted a pooling system
                  of accounting favored by many high tech companies that own
                  considerable intangible assets. Many high tech companies to
                  took advantage of this pooling system of accounting when
                  merging. This method allows companies to merge without
                  attaching a goodwill accounting charge.
                   
                  The House Commerce Committee held a hearing last year. Then,
                  Rep. Cal Dooley (D-CA) and Rep. Chris Cox (R-CA) introduced a
                  bill that would have placed a moratorium on FASB's ability to
                  eliminate the pooling method of accounting. The FASB is an
                  independent body that has been charged by the SEC with writing
                  accounting rules. Congressional actions were a shot across its
                  bow.
                   
                  On July 20, 2001, the FASB revised its rules to accommodate
                  the new economy. It issued two Statements. Statement 141
                  requires that all business combinations be accounted for under
                  a single method - the purchase method. Use of the pooling of
                  interests method is no longer permitted. Statement 142
                  requires that goodwill no longer be amortized to earnings, but
                  instead be reviewed for impairment. This change provides
                  investors with greater transparency regarding the economic
                  value of goodwill and its impact on earnings.
                   
                  Rep. Cliff Stearns, the Chairman of the Subcommittee, presided
                  throughout the hearing. He praised the FASB in his opening
                  statement. He said that "I find that the results of
                  the FASB’s business combinations project and the related
                  accounting treatment for intangible assets, as outlined in
                  Statements’ 141 and 142, speak well for having an private
                  independent standard setting board. The FASB should be
                  commended for an open process that included several public
                  hearings and working with all parties to understand their
                  concerns regarding business combinations." He also
                  focused on international accounting standards and on pro forma
                  reporting. He stated that "some level of standardization
                  should be applied to pro forma reporting."
                   
                  Several members addressed the role of the Congress in the
                  setting of accounting standards. Rep. Billy Tauzin
                  (R-LA), the Chairman of the full Committee said in his prepared
                  statement that "this Committee asserts its
                  jurisdiction over the [FASB] precisely because this
                  organization's role in accounting standards setting is
                  extremely important to commerce in general and to the evolving
                  new economy, characterized by the high tech sector, in
                  particular." He praised the FASB for "modernizing
                  appraisals of intangible assets to reflect the realities of
                  many information based companies." He also said the the
                  Committee "will play a strong oversight role in the
                  adoption of any international standards by the United
                  States." Similarly, Rep.
                  Anna Eshoo (D-CA), who represents a Silicon Valley
                  district, stated that "there are tensions of values
                  between the FASB and the Congress," but this is
                  "healthy".
                   
                  See also, prepared testimony of witnesses: Edmund
                  Jenkins (FASB), James
                  Leisenring (International Accounting Standards Board), and
                  Barry
                  Rogstad American Business Conference). | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | More News | 
               
              
                7/31. The House
                  Science Committee's Research Subcommittee held a hearing
                  titled "Innovation in Information Technology: Beyond
                  Faster Computers and Higher Bandwidth." The hearing
                  examined the effect of federal research and development
                  spending on promoting innovation in information technology.
                   
                  7/31. The USPTO published
                  the online version of USPTO
                  Today [PTO] for July/August.
                   
                  7/31. The USPTO published
                  a final
                  rule in the Federal Register adjusting certain patent
                  fees. See, Federal Register, July 31, 2001, Vol. 66, No. 147,
                  at Pages 39447 - 39450. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Intergraph Files Patent
                  Infringement Suit Against Intel | 
               
              
                7/30. Intergraph
                  filed a complaint
                  [PDF] in U.S. District Court (EDTex)
                  against Intel alleging
                  patent infringement. Intergraph alleges that Intel infringed
                  two Intergraph patent pertaining to parallel instruction
                  computing, through the manufacture and sale of processors and
                  computing systems based on Intel's IA-64 EPIC (explicitly
                  parallel instruction computing) architecture. IA-64 EPIC is
                  included in Intel's new Itanium
                  chips.
                   
                  Patents in Suit. Intergraph alleges infringement of
                  U.S. Patent Nos. 5,794,003.
                  and 5,560,028,
                  of which it is the assignee. The '003 patent is titled
                  "Instruction cache associative crossbar switch
                  system". It discloses a "computing system as
                  described in which individual instructions are executable in
                  parallel by processing pipelines, and instructions to be
                  executed in parallel by different pipelines are supplied to
                  the pipelines simultaneously. The system includes storage for
                  storing an arbitrary number of the instructions to be
                  executed. The instructions to be executed are tagged with
                  pipeline identification tags indicative of the pipeline to
                  which they should be dispatched. The pipeline identification
                  tags are supplied to a system which controls a crossbar
                  switch, enabling the tags to be used to control the switch and
                  supply the appropriate instructions simultaneously to the
                  differing pipelines."
                   
                  The '028 patent is titled "Software scheduled superscalar
                  computer architecture." It discloses a "computing
                  system is described in which groups of individual instructions
                  are executable in parallel by processing pipelines, and
                  instructions to be executed in parallel by different pipelines
                  are supplied to the pipelines simultaneously. During
                  compilation of the instructions those which can be executed in
                  parallel are identified. The system includes a register for
                  storing an arbitrary number of the instructions to be
                  executed. The instructions to be executed are tagged with
                  pipeline identification tags and group identification tags
                  indicative of the pipeline to which they should be dispatched,
                  and the group of instructions which may be dispatched during
                  the same operation. The pipeline and group identification tags
                  are used to dispatch the appropriate groups of instructions
                  simultaneously to the differing pipelines."
                   
                  Request for Relief. Intergraph asks for a declaration
                  that the patents in suit have been infringed, preliminary and
                  permanent injunctive relief, actual damages, and enhanced
                  damages.
                   
                  Forum Shopping. Intergraph is a Delaware Corporation
                  based in Huntsville, Alabama. Intel is a Delaware Corporation
                  based in Santa Clara, California. The inventors are residents
                  of California. Intergraph filed its complaint in Marshall,
                  Texas, a town of 25,000 located at the intersection of U.S.
                  Routes 59 and 80. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Wednesday, August 1 | 
               
              
                9:30 AM. The Senate
                  Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on trade issues.
                  Location: Room 253, Russell Building.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The Senate
                  Finance Committee will hold a hearing on whether to extend
                  the existing Internet tax moratorium, and whether to
                  allow state and local governments to impose sales taxes on
                  remote sellers, including Internet retailers. The scheduled
                  witnesses are: Tom Woodward (Congressional Budget Office),
                  Frank Shafroth (National Governors Association), David
                  Bullington (Wal-Mart), Frank Julian (Federated Department
                  Stores), Michael Grieve (American Enterprise Institute),
                  Steven Rauschenberger (Nat. Conf. of State Leg.), Jeff
                  Friedman (KPMG). Location: Room 215, Dirksen Building.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The Senate
                  Banking Committee will hold a meeting to mark up
                  legislation and to vote on nominations. The agenda includes
                  the nominations of Michael Garcia to be Assistant
                  Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement and Henrietta
                  Fore to be Director of the Mint. Location: Room 538,
                  Dirksen Building.
                   
                  10:00 AM - 12:00 NOON. The U.S. International
                  Telecommunication Advisory Committee Telecommunication
                  Development Sector (ITAC-D) will hold a public meeting. 48
                  hour pre-clearance is required. See, notice
                  in Federal Register, July 16, 2001, Vol. 66, No. 136, at Pages
                  37086 - 37087. Location: Room 2533A, Department of State, 2201
                  C Street, NW, Washington DC.
                   
                  10:15 AM. The House
                  International Relations Committee will meet to mark up
                  several bills, including HR
                  2581, the Export Administration Act of 2001,
                  sponsored by Rep.
                  Benjamin Gilman (R-NY). Location: Room 2172, Rayburn
                  Building.
                   
                  10:30 AM. The House
                  Education Committee will meet to mark up several bills,
                  including HR
                  1992, the Internet Equity and Education Act of 2001,
                  sponsored by Rep.
                  Johnny Isakson (R-GA). The bill would make it easier to
                  obtain federal financial aid for web based education programs.
                  Location: Room 2175, Rayburn Building.
                   
                  12:30 PM. Carl Yankowski, CEO of Palm will speak at an NPC
                  Luncheon. For more information, call 202-662-7501 or e-mail pnelson@press.org.
                  Location: National Press Club,
                  529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor, Washington DC.
                   
                  2:30 PM. The Senate
                  Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on several pending
                  nominations, including Nancy Victory to be Assistant
                  Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information.
                  Location: Room 253, Russell Building. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Thursday, August 2 | 
               
              
                | 10:30 AM. Reps. Richard Neal (D-MA), Tom Davis (R-VA), Zoe
                  Lofgren (D-CA), and Jerry Weller (R-IL) will hold a press
                  conference to announce the introduction of legislation to
                  reform the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) treatment of
                  Incentive Stock Options (ISOs). Location: House Triangle. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Correction | 
               
              
                | Yesterday's edition of the TLJ Daily E-Mail Alert reported
                  on the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals (8thCir) in Steele
                  v. Bemidji. The hyperlink to the opinion in most copies of
                  the Alert was incorrect. See, correct
                  hyperlink. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal is a free access web site
                  and e-mail alert that provides news, records, and analysis of
                  legislation, litigation, and regulation affecting the computer
                  and Internet industry. This e-mail service is offered free of
                  charge to anyone who requests it. Just provide TLJ an e-mail
                  address. 
                   
                  Number of subscribers: 1,913. 
                  Contact: 202-364-8882; E-mail. 
                  P.O. Box 15186, Washington DC, 20003. 
                  Privacy
                  Policy 
                  Notices
                  & Disclaimers 
                  Copyright 1998 - 2001 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     |