| Patent Infringement and
                  State Sovereign Immunity | 
               
              
                7/20. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (FedCir) issued its opinion in State
                  Contracting & Engineering v. Florida, a
                  case involving the application of state sovereign immunity to
                  patent infringement and related claims.
                   
                  The plaintiffs hold two patents pertaining to highway sound
                  barrier walls. Plaintiffs bid on, and received construction
                  contracts from the State of Florida Department of
                  Transportation (FDOT). Plaintiffs subsequently obtained
                  patents on the technology included within their proposals. The
                  FDOT included data from these proposals in subsequent requests
                  for bids. Plaintiffs sought royalties. After unsuccessful
                  negotiations, plaintiffs filed a complaint in U.S. District
                  Court (SDFl)
                  against Florida and seven private contracts. Plaintiffs
                  alleged direct infringement by Florida, direct infringement by
                  the private contractors, a Lanham Act violation by Florida,
                  unconstitutional taking by Florida, and breach of contract by
                  Florida. The District Court granting summary judgment to
                  Defendants.
                   
                  The Appeals Court affirmed the District Court's grant of
                  summary judgment to Florida as to the patent infringement and
                  Lanham Act claims on grounds of sovereign immunity. It also
                  affirmed the grant of summary judgment to Florida as to the
                  takings claim and the breach of contract claim. It vacated and
                  remanded the District Court's grant of summary judgment to the
                  private contractors on the patent infringement claims. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | DOJ Forms Anti Hacking and
                  IP Crimes Units | 
               
              
                7/20. Attorney General John Ashcroft gave a speech
                  in which he announced the formation of nine new units at the Department of Justice named
                  Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property (CHIP) units. The
                  new units will prosecute computer intrusions, copyright and
                  trademark violations, theft of trade secrets and economic
                  espionage, theft of computer and high tech components, fraud,
                  and other Internet crimes. One such unit already exists for
                  the San Francisco area. New units will be created for Los
                  Angeles, San Diego, Atlanta, Boston, New York City, Dallas,
                  Seattle and northern Virginia. The CHIP units will be staffed
                  with a total of 77 people, of which 48 will be prosecutors.
                   
                  AG Ashcroft stated that "These new teams will prosecute
                  vigorously those responsible for cybercrime. As a result we
                  hope to reinforce the message to would-be criminals that there
                  are no free passes in cyberspace. Crimes will be investigated
                  and criminals will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
                  law." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Evans Wants More Time to
                  Develop New 3G Plan | 
               
              
                7/19. Commerce Secretary Donald Evans sent a letter
                  to FCC Chairman Michael Powell regarding plans to
                  "identify additional spectrum for third generation (3G)
                  advanced mobile wireless services." He stated that this
                  will be done "with additional time". While the
                  Clinton administration had developed a plan, and set a
                  timetable for identifying and allocating spectrum for 3G
                  wireless systems, Evans stated that "I have directed the
                  Acting Administrator of the National
                  Telecommunications and Information Administration to work
                  with the FCC to develop a new plan for the selection of 3G
                  spectrum."
                   
                  CTIA
                  P/CEO Tom Wheeler had this reaction: "Today's letter is
                  good news for the wireless industry. It confirms that the
                  highest levels of government, from both the commercial and
                  military perspectives, are searching for a “win-win”
                  solution on spectrum allocation for the next generation of
                  wireless services. The letter also calls for both speed and
                  flexibility in finding that solution - two characteristics
                  that will be necessary as we strive in the weeks ahead for a
                  solution that preserves national security and enhances our
                  economy. ..." See, release. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Export Control Bills | 
               
              
                7/19. Rep. David
                  Dreier (R-CA), Amo
                  Houghton (R-NY) and Jeff
                  Flake (R-AZ) introduced HR 2568, the Export Administration
                  Act of 2001. It is identical to S
                  149 as reported by the Senate Banking
                  Committee on March 22, 2001. The bill would ease
                  restraints on the export of most dual use products, such as
                  computers and software. The bill was referred to the Committee
                  on International Relations. See, Dreier release.
                   
                  7/18. Rep. Robert
                  Menendez (D-NJ), Rep. Amo Houghton (R-NY), Jeff Flake
                  (R-AZ), and Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) introduced HR
                  2557, the Export Administration Act of 2001.
                   
                  7/20. Rep. Benjamin
                  Gilman (R-NY) introduced HR 2581, a bill to provide
                  authority to control exports. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | New Documents | 
               
              
                USCA:
                  opinion
                  in Southco v. Kanbridge re the originality requirement for
                  copyright protection, 7/20 (HTML, USCA).
                   
                  Ashcroft:
                  speech
                  re formation of cybercrime units at DOJ, 7/20 (HTML, DOJ).
                   
                  Boucher:
                  HR
                  2526, the Internet Tax Fairness Act, 7/17 (HTML, LibCong).
                   
                  Stearns:
                  HR
                  2536, the Broadcast Ownership for the 21st Century Act,
                  7/17 (HTML, LibCong).
                   
                  Hollings:
                  S
                  1189, a bill to require the FCC to amend its newspaper
                  cross ownership rules, 7/17 (HTML, LibCong).
                   
                  LaFalce:
                  HR
                  2579, the Internet Gambling Payments Prohibition Act, 7/20
                  (HTML, LibCong).
                   
                  Menendez:
                  HR
                  2557, the Export Administration Act of 2001, 7/18 (HTML,
                  LibCong). | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | The Originality Requirement
                  of Copyright | 
               
              
                7/20. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (3rdCir) issued its opinion
                  in Southco
                  v. Kanbridge, a case regarding the originality
                  requirement for copyright protection.
                   
                  Facts. Southco manufactures captive screw fasteners,
                  devices used in assembling the panels of computers and
                  telecommunications equipment. Southco developed a numbering
                  system to serve as a shorthand description of the relevant
                  characteristics of each fastener to assist its employees and
                  customers in identifying and distinguishing among its
                  products. This nine digit numbering system has become an
                  industry standard. Kanebridge is a distributor of competing
                  fasteners. It began using Southco's part numbers in comparison
                  charts that were included in advertisements and other
                  literature that it provides to customers.
                   
                  District Court. Southco filed a complaint in U.S.
                  District Court (EDPenn)
                  against Kanbridge alleging patent infringement. The District
                  Court granted Southco a preliminary injunction. This appeal
                  followed.
                   
                  Appeals Court. Kanbridge argued several issues on
                  appeal (including lack of originality, the scenes a faire
                  doctrine, the merger doctrine, and fair use). However, the
                  Appeals Court reversed pursuant to the lack of originality,
                  and therefore did not address the other issues. The Court
                  applied Section
                  102 of the Copyright Act (which provides copyright
                  protection for "original works of authorship") and
                  the 1991 opinion
                  of the Supreme Court in Feist Publications v. Rural Tel.
                  Serv., 499 U.S. 340 (which held that the originality
                  requirement means that a work must have been
                  "independently created by the author" and must
                  possess "at least some minimal degree of
                  creativity."). The Appeals Court held that there was no
                  originality here. It wrote: "there is simply no room for
                  creativity when assigning a number to a new panel fastener.
                  The part has certain relevant characteristics, and the
                  numbering system specifies certain numbers for each of those
                  characteristics. As a result, there is only one possible part
                  number for any new panel fastener that Southco creates. This
                  number results from the mechanical application of the system,
                  not creative thought." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | FCC Approves Verizon 271
                  Application in Connecticut | 
               
              
                7/20. The FCC approve
                  Verizon's Section
                  271 application to provide in region interLATA service in
                  Connecticut. Verizon serves only two communities in
                  Connecticut with a total of 60,000 lines. See, FCC
                  release. Verizon has a 271 application pending with the
                  FCC for Pennsylvania, and plans to file applications later
                  this year for the states of New Hampshire, New Jersey, Rhode
                  Island, and Vermont. See, Verizon
                  release.
                   
                  Sprint General Counsel Richard Devlin had this reaction:
                  "Sprint is disappointed that the FCC did not use this
                  Section 271 application to signal a get-tough approach to
                  Verizon and other Bell companies that have not truly opened up
                  their local markets to competition. Verizon's Connecticut
                  customers, like its New York customers, will experience very
                  limited local competition - and not benefit from the promise
                  of full local competition under the Telecom Act." See, release. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | House Committee Examines
                  Violent Video Games | 
               
              
                7/20. The House
                  Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Telecommunications
                  and the Internet held a hearing on the software, movie and
                  music industries' efforts to curb children's exposure to
                  violent content.
                   
                  Rep. Billy Tauzin
                  (R-LA), Chairman of the full committee, said in his prepared
                  statement that "there is legislation currently before
                  the Energy and Commerce Committee that would enable the
                  government to enforce policies against marketing and selling
                  this material to minors, and we need to think about it very
                  carefully."
                   
                  Douglas Lowenstein of the Interactive
                  Digital Software Association (IDSA) addressed games. He
                  argued in his prepared
                  testimony that a majority of game players are adults, and
                  that since games are costly, children need parental consent to
                  obtain them. He also testified that "we do live in a
                  world where media is incredibly complex, where the Internet
                  spans the globe, where consumers, young and old, have access
                  to information in ways never before imagined. In this
                  environment, it is simply not possible or realistic to create
                  an airtight system where young people do not hear about, or
                  even obtain, games that are not appropriate for them."
                   
                  Lee Peeler of the FTC said in his prepared
                  testimony that "Seventy percent of the 118 electronic
                  games with a Mature rating for violence the Commission
                  examined targeted children under 17."
                   
                  See also, prepared statements of other witnesses: Jack
                  Valenti (Motion Picture Association of America), Hilary
                  Rosen (Recording Industry Association of America), Doug
                  McMillon (Wal-Mart Stores), and Daphne
                  White (The Lion & Lamb Project). | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | More News | 
               
              
                7/20. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (FedCir) issued its opinion in Dayco
                  v. Total Containment, a patent infringement
                  case. The case involved claims of infringement of several
                  patents pertaining to cylindrical hoses. The District Court
                  granted summary judgment of non-infringement. The Appeals
                  Court affirmed as to one patent, and vacated and remanded as
                  to the others.
                   
                  7/20. Microsoft filed its opposition
                  [PDF] to the DOJ's July 13 motion
                  [PDF] for immediate issuance of mandate in the Microsoft
                  antitrust case. Microsoft would like the Appeals Court to
                  address its July 18 Petition
                  for Rehearing [PDF] before returning the case to the
                  District Court. It stated that the petition "raises a
                  substantial question and thus merits the attention of the
                  Court. The mandate plainly should not issue while the Court is
                  still considering Microsoft’s petition and plaintiffs’
                  response." | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | People and Appointments | 
               
              
                7/23. Philip Beck joined the Antitrust Division of the
                  Department of Justice. He will take over as lead trial counsel
                  in the Microsoft antitrust case. He was previously a partner
                  in the Chicago office of the law firm of Bartlit Beck. The DOJ
                  release announcing his appointment also referenced the
                  DOJ's "successful prosecution of the case to this
                  point."
                   
                  7/20. The Senate confirmed Ralph Boyd to be Assistant
                  Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division and Eileen
                  O'Connor to be Assistant Attorney General for the Tax
                  Division.
                   
                  7/16. Patricia
                  Paoletta joined the Washington DC office of the law
                  firm of Wiley Rein &
                  Fielding as a partner in its Communications practice. She
                  will head the International Telecommunications Group. She was
                  previously VP of Government Relations at Level 3
                  Communications. Prior to that she worked for the House Commerce Committee.
                  Before that she worked as Director of Telecommunications Trade
                  Policy at the Office of the U.S.
                  Trade Representative. And before that, she worked in the
                  Office of International Communications at the FCC. See, WRF
                  release.
                   
                  7/17. Roy Bartlett joined the San Francisco office of
                  the law firm of Covington &
                  Burling as Of Counsel. He previously was a partner in the
                  law firm of White &
                  Case. He will focus on complex business litigation
                  matters, with an emphasis on intellectual property concerns.
                  See, C&B
                  release [PDF].
                   
                  7/23. John Elwood joined the Criminal Division of the
                  Department of Justice as Counselor to the Assistant Attorney
                  General Michael Chertoff. He previously was a partner in the
                  Washington DC office of the law firm of Baker Botts. See, BB release
                  and bio. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Monday, July 23. | 
               
              
                1:00 PM. The Senate
                  Commerce Committee's Science, Technology, and Space
                  Subcommittee will hold a hearing to examine the use of
                  technology in the health care system, focusing on
                  opportunities and obstacles regarding the use of Internet
                  technology to empower patients to improve their health care.
                  The witnesses will be Tom Scully (Centers for Medicare and
                  Medicaid Services), Sherrilynne Fuller (University of 
                  Washington School of Medicine), John Kenagy (Harvard Business
                  School), Willie May (NIST), Albert Patterson (Premier). See, release.
                  Location: Room 253, Russell Building. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Tuesday, July 24 | 
               
              
                8:30 AM - 3:30 PM. The Consumer
                  Electronics Association will hold a conference titled
                  "The DTV Transition: Is Laissez Faire Fair?" The
                  keynote speaker will be Sen.
                  Conrad Burns (R-MT); he will speak at 8:35 AM. The price
                  is $199 in advance, and $299 at the door. Location: Ronald
                  Reagan Building and International Trade Center, Polaris Room,
                  1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington DC. See, full
                  schedule and online
                  registration page.
                   
                  9:30 AM. The House
                  Commerce Committee's Telecommunications and Internet
                  Subcommittee will hold a hearing titled "U.S. Deployment
                  of Third Generation Wireless Services: When Will It
                  Happen and Where Will It Happen?" Location: Room 2123,
                  Rayburn Building.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The House Financial
                  Services Committee's  Financial Institutions
                  Subcommittee will hold a hearing on HR
                  556, the Unlawful Internet Gambling Funding Prohibition
                  Act, and other Internet gambling proposals. Location: Room
                  2128, Rayburn Building.
                   
                  RESCHEDULED TO JULY 31. 10:00
                  AM. The House
                  Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight and
                  Investigations will hold a hearing for titled "How Secure
                  is Sensitive Commerce Department Data and Operations? A Review
                  of the Department's Computer Security Policies and
                  Practices." Location: Room 2322, Rayburn Building.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The House
                  Judiciary Committee will hold a meeting to mark up eight
                  bills, including HR
                  2047, the Patent and Trademark Office Authorization Act of
                  2002. Location: Room, 2141 Rayburn Building.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The Cato Institute
                  will host a panel discussion titled "Broadband and the
                  Markets: Perspectives from the Investment Community."
                  The speakers will be Doug Ashton (Bear Stearns), Blake Bath
                  (Lehman Brothers), Scott Cleland (Precursor Group), and Erik
                  Olbeter (Schwab Capital Markets). Location: Cato Institute,
                  1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW, Washington DC.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The Senate
                  Banking Committee will hold a hearing on monetary policy
                  at which Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan will
                  testify. The Committee will also hold a business meeting to
                  consider the nomination of Harvey Pitt, to be a
                  Chairman of the SEC. Location:
                  Room 216, Hart Building. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          | 
            
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal is a free access web site
                  and e-mail alert that provides news, records, and analysis of
                  legislation, litigation, and regulation affecting the computer
                  and Internet industry. This e-mail service is offered free of
                  charge to anyone who requests it. Just provide TLJ an e-mail
                  address. 
                   
                  Number of subscribers: 1,844. 
                   
                  Contact: 202-364-8882; E-mail. 
                  P.O. Box 15186, Washington DC, 20003. 
                   
                  Privacy
                  Policy 
                   
                  Notices
                  & Disclaimers 
                   
                  Copyright 1998 - 2001 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     |