| RIM Wins Patent
                  Infringement Suit | 
               
              
                | 7/9. The U.S. District Court (NDCal)
                  granted summary judgment to Research in Motion
                  (RIM), maker of the Blackberry wireless e-mail devices, in Glenayre's action for
                  infringement of U.S.
                  Patent No. 5,631,503. The Court found that RIM's products
                  did not infringe the patent in suit, which discloses a battery
                  based power generation technique for use in wireless
                  communication devices. Glenayre stated that it will seek
                  reconsideration by the District Court. See, Glenayre
                  release. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | DrKoop Settles Securities
                  Litigation | 
               
              
                | 7/9. Drkoop.com
                  announced that it has reached a tentative agreement to settle
                  the consolidated securities class action lawsuit filed against
                  it and several former and current officers and directors in
                  the U.S. District Court (WDTex). It
                  stated that it will pay $4.25 Million. See, drkoop
                  release. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Bush Names New NSTAC
                  Members | 
               
              
                | 7/9. President Bush announced his intent to appoint six
                  people to the President's National Security
                  Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC): Daniel
                  Burnham (Raytheon Company), Joseph Nacchio (Qwest), Van
                  Honeycutt (Computer Sciences Corporation), Clay Jones
                  (Rockwell Collins), and David Cote (TRW). Duane Ackerman
                  (BellSouth). In addition, Burnham will become Chairman, and
                  Nacchio will become Vice Chairman. The NSTAC was created by
                  President Reagan by Executive
                  Order 12382 in September of 1982. It provides information
                  and advice to the President from the perspective of the
                  telecommunications industry regarding the telecommunications
                  aspects of national security. See, release. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          | 
            
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Dot Kids Domain Bill
                  Introduced | 
               
              
                | 6/28. Rep. John
                  Shimkus (R-IL) and Rep.
                  Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced HR
                  2417, the "Dot Kids Domain Name Act of 2001."
                  The bill would the Secretary of Commerce to enter into
                  agreements with the ICANN for the addition of a new top-level
                  Internet domain to the root system as a location of any
                  material that is harmful to minors. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Another Broadband Bill
                  Introduced | 
               
              
                | 6/28. Rep. John
                  McHugh (R-NY) introduced HR
                  2401, the "Rural America Digital Accessibility
                  Act". The bill provides for grants and loan guarantees to
                  bring broadband telecommunications services to underserved
                  rural areas. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | New Documents | 
               
              
                ICANN:
                  A Unique,
                  Authoritative Root for the DNS, 7/9 (HTML, ICANN).
                   
                  USCA:
                  opinion
                  in Cody v. Weber re prisoners right to use of PCs, 7/9 (PDF,
                  USCA).
                   
                  USCA:
                  opinion
                  in Columbia v. Krypton re copyright infringement, 7/9 (PDF,
                  USCA).
                   
                  Shimkus:
                  HR
                  2417, the Dot Kids Domain Name Act of 2001, 6/28 (HTML,
                  LibCong).
                   
                  McHugh:
                  HR
                  2401, the Rural America Digital Accessibility Act, 6/28
                  (HTML, LibCong).
                   
                  NCTA:
                  reply
                  brief in NCTA v. Gulf Power Company, 7/6 (PDF, NCTA).
                   
                  USPTO: NPRM
                  re elimination of continued prosecution application practice
                  as to utility and plant patent applications, 7/9 (HTML, FedReg). | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | 8th Circuit Rules on
                  Prisoner's Use of Computer | 
               
              
                7/9. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (8thCir) issued its opinion
                  in Cody
                  v. Weber, a case regarding a prisoner's
                  constitutional right of access to the courts in the context of
                  his use of a personal computer and electronic storage media,
                  and searches of his electronic records by prison officials.
                  The Appeals Court held that the prisoner was not entitled to
                  keep his computer.
                   
                  Background. William Cody has been serving a life
                  sentence for murder in the South Dakota State Penitentiary
                  since 1978. He is now a jailhouse lawyer who occupies his time
                  by filing lawsuits against prison officials, and others. He
                  first acquired a PC in 1982. He has around one hundred
                  computer disks on which he has stored personal and legal data,
                  including communications with real attorneys. In 1996 the
                  prison changed its policy, and required Cody to dispose of his
                  PC. It allowed him to print out files. Cody filed a complaint
                  in U.S. District Court (DSD) against
                  prison officials alleging numerous claims. Cody appealed the
                  District Court's summary judgment on three claims: his right
                  to retain his computer; reading of his electronic records by
                  prison officials; and retaliation by prison officials for
                  filing lawsuits.
                   
                  Prisoner's Use of PC. The District Court granted
                  defendants' motion for summary judgment on the claim regarding
                  use of a computer. It held that he was not entitled to
                  continued use of his computer. The Appeals Court affirmed. The
                  issue was not whether a prisoner has a right to use a
                  computer. Rather, Cody argued that since his notes were in
                  electronic format, it would be a denial of his right of access
                  to the courts to deny him access to a computer to access his
                  notes. The Appeals Court, noting that the prison allowed him
                  to print out any files, rejected his argument. It concluded
                  that he suffered no injury, which is a required element of
                  claim for denial of access to the courts.
                   
                  Search of Electronic Records. The District Court
                  granted defendants' motion for summary judgment on the claim
                  regarding unauthorized reading of his computer records on the
                  grounds that there was no actual injury. The Appeals Court
                  reversed, holding that Cody had raised genuine issues of
                  material fact as to whether his records had been searched, and
                  whether he had been injured -- by being disadvantaged in
                  ongoing litigation.
                   
                  The Court of Appeals also reversed the District Court on the
                  retaliation claim. The opinion was split. Judge Gibson wrote
                  the opinion of the Court; Judge McMillian joined. Judge Beam
                  would have upheld the District Court in full. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | 9th Circuit Affirms
                  Copyright Infringement Judgment | 
               
              
                | 7/9. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (9thCir) issued its opinion
                  [PDF] in Columbia
                  v. Krypton, a copyright infringement case.
                  Krypton Broadcasting operated three TV stations that licensed
                  programs from Columbia Broadcasting. Elvin Feltner was its
                  principal. The stations failed to make timely licensing
                  payments. Columbia terminated the licensing agreements. The
                  stations continued to air the programs. Columbia filed a
                  complaint in U.S. District Court (CDCal)
                  against Krypton and Feltner alleging copyright infringement.
                  The District Court found Feltner vicariously and
                  contributorily liable for the copyright infringement committed
                  by the TV stations, and awarded $31.68 Million in statutory
                  damages. Feltner appealed. The Appeals Court affirmed. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | USPTO NPRM | 
               
              
                | 7/9. The USPTO published
                  a notice
                  of proposed rulemaking regarding elimination of continued
                  prosecution application (CPA) practice as to utility and plant
                  patent applications. See, Federal Register, July 9, 2001, Vol.
                  66, No. 131, at Pages 35763 - 35765. The notice stated that
                  the American Inventors Protection Act of 1999 enacted
                  provisions for the continued examination of a utility or plant
                  application at the request of the applicant, and therefore,
                  "there no longer appears to be a need for continued
                  prosecution application (CPA) practice as to utility and plant
                  applications. Thus, the Office is proposing to eliminate CPA
                  practice as to utility and plant applications. An applicant
                  for a utility or plant patent may also continue to effectively
                  obtain further examination of the application by filing a
                  continuing application under section 1.53(b). Since RCE
                  practice does not apply to design applications, CPA practice
                  will remain in place for design applications." Written
                  comments must be received on or before September 7, 2001. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Tuesday, July 10 | 
               
              
                12:00 NOON - 1:30 PM. The Internet
                  Education Foundation (501(c)(3) affiliated with the
                  Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee) will host a
                  panel discussion on the Markle Foundation's study titled
                  "Toward a Framework for Internet Accountability."
                  Lunch will be served. RSVP to Danielle at RSVP@neted.org or 202-
                  638-4370. The speakers will be Zoe Baird (Markle Foundation), Stan
                  Greenberg (Greenberg
                  Quinlan & Rosner), Adam Thierer (Cato), Lawrence
                  Lessig (Stanford Law School), and Caitlin Halligan (NY
                  Attorney General's Office). Location: Reserve Officers Assoc.,
                  One Constitution Ave, NE, Washington DC.
                   
                  2:00 PM. The House reconvenes following its July 4 recess. The
                  House will consider several non tech related measures under
                  suspension of the rules.
                   
                  2:00 PM. The House
                  Ways and Means Committee's Subcommittee on Trade will hold
                  a hearing on renewal of Normal Trade Relations with the
                  People's Republic of China. Location: Room B-318, Rayburn
                  Building. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Wednesday, July 11 | 
               
              
                9:30 AM. The Senate Governmental Affairs Committee will hold
                  a hearings on S 803, a bill to establish a Federal Chief
                  Information Officer within the Office of Management and
                  Budget. Location: Room 342, Dirksen Building.
                   
                  9:30 AM. The Senate
                  Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on Internet
                  privacy. The witnesses are Marc Rotenberg (EPIC), Fred
                  Cate (Indiana Law School), Paul Schwartz (Brooklyn Law
                  School), Paul Misener (Amazon), Hans Brondmo, Les Seagraves (Earthlink),
                  Ira Rubinstein (Microsoft), and Erik Olbetter (Schwab).
                  Location: Room 253, Russell Building.
                   
                  10:30 AM. The House
                  Science Committee's Subcommittee on 21st Century
                  Competitiveness will meet to mark up HR 1992, the
                  "Internet Equity and Education Act of 2001."
                  Location: Room 2175, Rayburn Building.
                   
                  12:00 NOON. The House
                  Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and
                  Consumer Protection will hold a hearing titled "The
                  Potential for Discrimination in Health Insurance Based on
                  Predictive Genetic Tests." Location: Room 2322, Rayburn
                  Building.
                   
                  2:00 PM. The Hispanic Council on International Affairs, the
                  U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, the Latin American
                  Management Association and the U.S. Mexican Chamber of
                  Commerce will hold a press conference to announce their
                  support for trade promotion authority (formerly known
                  as fast track) and the free trade area of the Americas. For
                  more info, contact Peter Hickman at 301-530-1210. Location: National Press Club, Holeman
                  Lounge, 529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor, Washington DC. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | More News | 
               
              
                7/9. Webvan, an online
                  grocer, ceased all operations. It stated that it intends to
                  file a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition.
                   
                  7/9. Comcast made an
                  offer to acquire AT&T's broadband businesses for 1.0525
                  Billion shares of Comcast stock, which had a value of $44.5
                  Billion as of the closing price on Friday June 6. See, Comcast
                  release. AT&T responded that "We have no current
                  plans to sell our Broadband business." See, AT&T
                  release.
                   
                  7/6. The NCTA filed its reply
                  brief [PDF] with the Supreme Court in NCTA v. Gulf
                  Power Company, the pole attachments case.
                   
                  7/9. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (FedCir) issued an opinion in Hallco
                  v. Foster, a patent infringement action.
                  The Appeals Court vacated and remanded. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal is a free access web site
                  and e-mail alert that provides news, records, and analysis of
                  legislation, litigation, and regulation affecting the computer
                  and Internet industry. This e-mail service is offered free of
                  charge to anyone who requests it. Just provide TLJ an e-mail
                  address. 
                   
                  Number of subscribers: 1,769. 
                  Contact: 202-364-8882; E-mail. 
                  P.O. Box 15186, Washington DC, 20003. 
                  Privacy
                  Policy 
                  Notices
                  & Disclaimers 
                  Copyright 1998 - 2001 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     |