| DOJ Nominees | 
               
              
                | 5/3. The Senate
                  Judiciary Committee held its Thursday executive business
                  meeting. The agenda included votes on the nominations of Ted
                  Olson to be Solicitor General, and Larry Thompson
                  to be Deputy Attorney General. The votes were held over, at
                  least until next week. The reason for the delay was an
                  unrelated ongoing dispute between Democrats and Committee
                  Chairman Orrin Hatch
                  (R-UT) over procedure for Senate confirmation of judges. Other
                  matters ripe for consideration by the Committee include the
                  nominations of Charles James to be an Assistant
                  Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division and Daniel
                  Bryant to be an Assistant Attorney General in charge of
                  the Office of Legislative Affairs. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Commerce Nominees | 
               
              
                | 5/3. The Senate
                  Commerce Committee approved several nominations, including
                  Brenda Becker to be Assistant Secretary of Commerce,
                  and Theodore Kassinger to be General Counsel of the
                  Department of Commerce. See, release. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Copyright NPRM | 
               
              
                | 5/3. The U.S.
                  Copyright Office published a Notice
                  of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register
                  regarding proposed amendments to its regulation governing
                  notices of termination of transfers and licenses covering the
                  extended renewal term. The current regulation is limited to
                  notices of terminations made under section 304(c) of the
                  copyright law. The Sonny
                  Bono Copyright Term Extension Act created a separate
                  termination right under section 304(d). Under the proposed
                  regulation, procedures governing notices of termination of the
                  extended renewal term would cover notices made under either
                  section 304(c) or 304(d). Comments are due by June 18, 2001.
                  See, Federal Register, May 3, 2001, Vol. 66, No. 86, at Pages
                  22139 - 22140. See also, PDF
                  copy in CO web site. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Universal Service | 
               
              
                | 5/3. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (5thCir) issued its opinion
                  in COMSAT
                  v. FCC, a petition for review of the Sixteenth
                  Order on Reconsideration in Federal-State Joint
                  Board on Universal Service, CC Docket No. 96-45. The Appeals
                  Court ruled that the FCC's
                  order permitting the Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers to
                  recoup universal services costs through access charges is
                  contrary to the plain language of §
                  254(e). It reversed and remanded. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | CIPA Regs | 
               
              
                | 5/3. The FCC published a notice
                  in the Federal Register that it has made minor technical
                  corrections to it rule implementing the Children's
                  Internet Protection Act [PDF]. See, Federal Register, May
                  3, 2001, Vol. 66, No. 86, at Pages 22133. The FCC published
                  its original
                  rule at Federal Register, April 16, 2001, Vol. 66, No. 73,
                  Pages 19394 - 19398.  | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | New Documents | 
               
              
                Cannon:
                  American
                  Broadband Competition Act, 5/3 (HTML, TLJ).
                   
                  USCA:
                  opinion
                  in Oak Tech v. ITC re patent infringement and section 337, 5/2
                  (HTML, IPO).
                   
                  USCA:
                  opinion
                  in COMSAT v. FCC re FCC universal service order, 5/3 (HTML,
                  USCA). | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Quote of the Day | 
               
              
                "It's been five years since the Telecommunications Act
                  passed. Still, in most parts of the country, more than 90% of
                  local phone service is controlled by the RBOCs. More troubling
                  is the appearance of a pattern and practice where the Bells
                  use the advantage of incumbency to systematically box out
                  broadband competitors like Covad, Rhythms, and McLeod." 
                   
                  Rep. Chris Cannon (R-UT), statement
                  about the 
                  American Broadband Competition Act, May 3, 2001. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Broadband Debate | 
               
              
                5/3. Rep. Chris
                  Cannon (R-UT) and Rep.
                  John Conyers (D-MI) introduced the American
                  Broadband Competition Act of 2001, another bill in the
                  debate over incenting the deployment of broadband services.
                  Its content contrasts sharply with another bill, HR
                  1542, the Internet Freedom and Broadband Deployment Act of
                  2001, sponsored by Rep.
                  Billy Tauzin (R-LA) and Rep. John Dingell
                  (D-MI). See also, statement
                  by Rep. Cannon.
                   
                  Overturn Goldwasser. The Cannon Conyers bill would
                  amend the Clayton
                  Act to provide that a violation of the
                  Communications Act can constitute a violation of antitrust
                  law. The bill provides that "the court shall not dismiss
                  such claim on the ground that the defendant's conduct was or
                  is subject to the Communications Act of 1934 ..." It also
                  provides that the trial court "may consider any conduct
                  that violates any obligations or requirements imposed by the
                  Communications Act of 1934 ... in determining whether the
                  defendant has engaged in anticompetitive or exclusionary
                  conduct." The bill thus addresses the July 25, 2000,
                  opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals (7thCir) in Goldwasser v. Ameritech.
                   
                  Fast Arbitration of Interconnection Disputes. The bill
                  would also require the Justice Department to establish an
                  alternative dispute resolution process for the arbitration of
                  disputes related to an interconnection agreement with an
                  incumbent local exchange carrier (ILEC), such as Verizon,
                  BellSouth and SBC. In this arbitration process, disputes must
                  be arbitrated within 45 days, the Commercial Dispute
                  Resolution Procedures of the American Arbitration Association
                  would apply, discovery would be available, and decisions would
                  be enforceable in federal court.
                   
                  No Joint Marketing of DSL by Bells. The bill would also
                  amend the Clayton Act to provide that an ILEC "and all
                  affiliates of such carrier may not jointly market in such
                  State any advanced telecommunications service with any other
                  telecommunications or information services offered by such
                  carrier or by any of such affiliates."
                   
                  Commerce v. Judiciary. The Cannon Conyers bill would
                  benefit competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), while the
                  Tauzin Dingell bill would benefit ILECs. In addition to the
                  conflict between constituencies, there is a conflict between
                  two committees, both of which seek authority over legislation
                  affecting the Internet. Both Cannon and Conyers are members of
                  the House Judiciary
                  Committee. Their bill would amend antitrust law, which
                  falls within the jurisdiction of their Judiciary Committee.
                  Tauzin and Dingell are the Chairman and ranking Democrat of
                  the House Commerce
                  Committee. Their bill would amend communications law,
                  which falls within the jurisdiction of their Commerce
                  Committee. In addition, Judiciary Committee Chairman James Sensenbrenner
                  (R-WI) has also asserted jurisdiction over the Tauzin Dingell
                  bill.
                   
                  Reaction. The USTA, whose
                  membership includes ILECs, issued a release
                  condemning the Cannon Conyers bill. USTA President Gary Lytle
                  said that "HR 1542 is the best vehicle for spurring
                  broadband deployment." The main provision of HR 1542
                  would exempt interLATA data traffic from the
                  requirements of Section
                  271 ot the Telecom Act of 1996, which requires the Bells
                  to open up their facilities to competitors before they are
                  allowed to provided interLATA (or long distance) services. In
                  contrast, the Consumers
                  Union (CU) and Consumer
                  Federation of America praised the Cannon Conyers bill.
                  "By attempting to streamline dispute resolution and
                  increase penalties for failure to comply with network opening
                  requirements, this legislation offers consumers a much better
                  chance of seeing local markets open to competition than either
                  the Tauzin-Dingell bill or the status quo," said the CU's
                  Gene Kimmelman. "We are concerned that the Tauzin Dingell
                  bill would have exactly the opposite effect of its professed
                  aim. Due to the economic slowdown, many of those who were the
                  real innovators for Internet services and local phone
                  competition are faltering. Tauzin-Dingell would hobble those
                  innovators by giving the monopoly Bell companies further
                  advantage over their potential competitors."  | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Patent Ruling Upheld | 
               
              
                | 5/2. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (FedCir) issued its opinion
                  in Oak
                  Technology v. ITC, an appeal of a Section 337
                  determination by the U.S.
                  International Trade Commission pertaining to the
                  importation of CD-ROM drive controllers. The ITC instituted an
                  investigation of MediaTek, United Microelectronics, Lite-On
                  Technology, and AOpen at the request of Oak Technology. Oak
                  asserted that MediaTek and the others imported articles into
                  the U.S. in violation of Oak's U.S.
                  Patent No. 5,581,715. The ITC ruled, pursuant to
                  Section 337, that the '715 patent was not infringed by
                  MediaTek and the others. The Court of Appeals affirmed. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | More News | 
               
              
                5/2. The FBI's National
                  Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC) issued an advisory
                  regarding a buffer overflow vulnerability in Microsoft's
                  Internet Information Services 5.0. The advisory stated that
                  "the threat level of the above vulnerability is
                  high." See also, Microsoft's Security
                  Bulletin MS01-023.
                   
                  5/3. The Treasury Department's Committee on Foreign
                  Investment in the United States approved ASM Lithography
                  Holding NV's acquisition of Silicon
                  Valley Group. ASM is a Dutch company. SVG is Intel's primary supplier of
                  automated wafer processing equipment for making
                  semiconductors. See, SVG
                  release.
                   
                  5/3. The SEC launched
                  of a web-based
                  survey that asks investors to provide information about
                  how they use electronic media, including the Internet, to make
                  investment decisions. See, SEC release.
                   
                  5/2. Anthony Wayne, Assistant Secretary of State For Economic
                  and Business Affairs, gave a speech
                  in Brussels, Belgium, to the Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD)
                  Opening Plenary. He touched on e-commerce disputes. "The
                  third issue is e-commerce codes of conduct, including
                  Alternative Dispute Resolution. I know this is a top priority
                  for Commissioner Byrne and DG SANCO. The U.S. Federal Trade
                  Commission and Department of Commerce have sponsored a number
                  of workshops on the issue. There are a number of interesting
                  models for alternative dispute resolution. I understand that
                  TACD NGOs have met with the Global Electronic Business
                  Dialogue (GBDE) to discuss ADR and other e-commerce issues.
                  Already, we can see the potential benefits of
                  collaboration."
                   
                  5/3. The Consumer Electronics
                  Association (CEA) submitted another comment
                  [PDF] to the FCC regarding
                  the compatibility between digital cable systems and consumer
                  electronic products. See also, CEA
                  release. PP Docket No. 00-67. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Today | 
               
              
                Day two of Computer Law
                  Association conference. Location: Monarch Hotel,
                  Washington DC.
                   
                  8:30 AM - 2:00 PM. The National Science Foundation's Special
                  Emphasis Panel in Advanced
                  Computational Infrastructure and Research will hold the
                  second of two days of closed meetings to review Distributed
                  Terascale Facility (DTF) proposals for financial support.
                  Location: Hyatt Reston, 1800 Presidents Street, Reston, VA.
                  See, notice in Federal Register, April 20, 2001, Vol. 66, No.
                  77, at Page 20337 - 20338.
                   
                  12:15 PM. The Federal
                  Communications Bar Association's Wireless and Legislation
                  Committee will host a luncheon. The price to attend is $15.
                  The speakers will be Mike Chappell, Legislative Director to
                  Rep. Chip Pickering (R-MS), and Paul Begey, Legislative
                  Assistant to Rep. Al Wynn (D-MD). RSVP to Arlice. Location: Sidley
                  & Austin, 1722 Eye Street, NW, 9th Floor, Washington DC. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal is a free access web site
                  and e-mail alert that provides news, records, and analysis of
                  legislation, litigation, and regulation affecting the computer
                  and Internet industry. This e-mail service is offered free of
                  charge to anyone who requests it. Just provide TLJ an e-mail
                  address. 
                   
                  Number of subscribers: 1,486. 
                   
                  Contact: 202-364-8882; E-mail. 
                  P.O. Box 15186, Washington DC, 20003. 
                   
                  Privacy
                  Policy | Notices
                  & Disclaimers | 
                  Copyright 1998 - 2001 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     |