| House Passes Bush Tax Bill | 
               
              
                | 3/8. The House passed HR 3,
                  the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Act of 2001, President
                  Bush's proposal to reduce tax rates, by a vote of 230 to 198.
                  See, Roll
                  Call No. 45. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | SEC & the Internet | 
               
              
                3/8. The U.S. District Court (NDIll)
                  approved a settlement agreement in the SEC's civil
                  enforcement action against Yun Soo Oh Park, an Internet stock
                  picker known as Tokyo Joe, and the company that he
                  controls. Tokyo Joe and his company consented to entry of an
                  order that enjoins them from violating the antifraud and other
                  provisions of the federal securities laws, and orders them to
                  pay $324,934 in ill-gotten gains and $429,696 in civil
                  penalties. They also agreed to post a hyperlink to the court
                  order on the home page of their stock picking web site. The SEC had
                  charged Tokyo Joe and his company with defrauding subscribers
                  by failing to disclose that he purchased shares of the stock
                  that he was recommending and that he planned to sell his
                  shares when the price rose following his recommendations. The
                  SEC had also charged Tokyo Joe with illegal touting. The Court
                  had previously rejected Tokyo Joe's argument that he was not
                  an "investment advisor" within the meaning of the
                  Investment Advisors Act. Said SEC Enforcement Director Richard
                  Walker, "This case has established groundbreaking
                  precedent. Those who are in the business of offering
                  investment advice on the Internet may take on the same duties
                  and responsibilities as other investment advisers." 
                  See, SEC
                  release.
                   
                  3/2. Acting SEC Chairman
                  Laura Unger gave a speech
                  in Washington DC in which she addressed regulation of financial
                  portals. She stated that "Financial portals provide a
                  central location where investors can find all types of
                  financial information and portfolio analysis tools. They can
                  aggregate their financial account data, and they can also
                  click on hyperlinks to broker-dealer websites to open
                  brokerage accounts and enter trades. ... But as portals have
                  gained in popularity, with Yahoo! Finance and other financial
                  portals becoming household words, broker-dealers are
                  increasingly finding themselves competing with the financial
                  portals for customers. At least one of the questions
                  broker-dealers ask is why aren't the portals registered? My
                  first question, though, is: what are the portals doing?
                  What are their relationships with the broker-dealers they
                  hyperlink to? What are their business arrangements and
                  compensation arrangements? How do the hyperlinks work, and
                  what do they look like? We're all familiar with the various
                  factors considered in analyzing whether an entity must
                  register as a broker-dealer. But these are difficult questions
                  with broad-ranging implications. ... I'm in the process of
                  organizing a roundtable to discuss some of these issues in
                  April."
                   
                  3/2. SEC Commissioner Isaac Hunt gave a speech
                  in Washington DC in which he suggested re-examination of the
                  subject of online communications made during a public
                  offering, especially during the waiting period. He stated
                  that the "Internet provides a mechanism that would allow
                  investors and companies to get together on a non-selective
                  basis to discuss a company's public offering. It is my hope
                  that the Commission will find a way to allow companies and
                  investors to take greater advantage of the Internet and thus
                  ... transform the waiting period into the education
                  period." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Judiciary Markup | 
               
              
                | 3/8. The House
                  Judiciary Committee approved several tech related bills at
                  a mark up session. HR 809,
                  a bill to make minor technical corrections to various antitrust
                  laws, was approved without debate or amendment. S 320,
                  a bill to make technical corrections in patent, copyright,
                  and trademark laws, was adopted quickly with a technical
                  amendment. HR 741
                  was also adopted. It amends the Trademark Act of 1946 to
                  implement the Madrid Protocol, an international
                  trademark treaty. The Protocol seeks to provide a one-stop
                  inexpensive method for trademark registration and protection. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | More IP News | 
               
              
                2/28. A panel of
                  the WIPO
                  Arbitration and Mediation Center issued its opinion
                  in a domain name dispute resolution proceeding
                  involving www.yahooasian.com and 4 other domain names which
                  include the word "yahoo." Yahoo!, the Santa Clara,
                  California, based Internet giant filed a complaint against the
                  Thai company formed in 2000 that registered the five
                  variations on its trademark. The panel found that the five
                  domain names are confusingly similar to the Yahoo! trademark,
                  that the respondent has no rights or legitimate interest in
                  the disputed domain name, and that the disputed domain names
                  were registered in bad faith. It ordered, therefore, that the
                  five domain names be transferred to Yahoo!
                   
                  3/6. The European
                  Patent Office published in its web site PDF copies of 88
                  decisions of its Board of Patent Appeals from 2000 and
                  early 2001.
                   
                  3/8. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (DC Cir) heard oral argument in Platte River
                  Cellular Limited Partnership v. FCC. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | New Documents | 
               
              
                Tauzin:
                  statement
                  re EU Privacy Directive, 3/8 (HTML, TLJ).
                   
                  Hunt:
                  speech
                  re initial stock offerings and the Internet, 3/2 (HTML, SEC).
                   
                  Unger: speech
                  re SEC regulation of financial portals, 3/2 (HTML, SEC). | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          | 
            
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Quote of the Day | 
               
              
                "The EU Privacy Directive is the EU's
                  Helms-Burton." 
                   
                  Jonathan Winer, testimony at House Trade Subcommittee
                  hearing, March 8. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | EU Privacy Directive
                  Criticized at Hearing | 
               
              
                3/8. The House
                  Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and
                  Consumer Protection held a long hearing titled EU Data
                  Protection Directive: Implications for the U.S. Privacy Debate.
                  The event provided several subcommittee members and witnesses
                  the opportunity to criticize the EU Privacy Directive, as well
                  as the Safe Harbor.
                   
                  Committee Chairman Billy
                  Tauzin (R-LA) was not present, but submitted a scathing
                  criticism of the EU Privacy Directive for the record. He
                  called it "an effort to impose the EU's will on the
                  U.S." It also "could be the imposition of one of the
                  largest trade barriers ever seen and is a direct reversal of
                  the efforts we have made in various free trade
                  agreements." Moreover, "the costs would be in the
                  multi-billions, and are all costs that will be passed on to
                  consumers." He also wrote that the Europeans do not
                  enforce it against themselves; "In fact, a number of
                  nations have not even bothered to ... enact implementing
                  legislation." He suggested that EU enforcement against
                  U.S. companies would therefore constitute a "double
                  standard." He also pointed out that the EU Privacy
                  Directive creates a private right of action. This, Tauzin
                  wrote, would infringe U.S. sovereignty, and subject U.S.
                  companies to financially crippling class action lawsuits.
                  Tauzin also criticized the Safe Harbor.
                   
                  Subcommittee Chairman Cliff
                  Stearns (R-FL) presided. He stated that "I am
                  concerned about the potentially regressive impact of the
                  Directive ... on international commerce and more specifically
                  on commerce between the European Community and the United
                  States. I am not convinced ... that the safe harbor provisions
                  negotiated by Ambassador Aaron in the previous administration
                  will help mitigate the concern over regressive effects." Rep. Steve Buyer (R-IN)
                  attacked the EU for trying to set standards for the rest of
                  the world, and for opposing free trade. He also quipped that
                  he understands "the good judgment of my ancestors to
                  leave the continent." Two Democrats had kind words for
                  the EU Privacy Directive, Rep. Diana DeGette
                  (D-CO) and Rep. Ed
                  Markey (D-MA). However, Markey's comments were directed
                  mostly at the privacy provisions of the Gramm Leach Bliley
                  bill, which he called "a pathetic joke", the
                  Republican Party, for denying him floor votes on privacy
                  amendments, and corporate America, for violating privacy.
                   
                  Two Europeans testified, Stefano Rodota (Chairman of the EU
                  Data Protection Working Party) and David Smith (Office of the
                  UK Information Commissioner). Smith often qualified his
                  remarks with the statement that he did not speak on behalf of
                  the EU. Rodota speaks English with difficulty. Moreover, the
                  two confused subcommittee members with contradictory or
                  non-responsive responses to questions about EU law and
                  procedure. See, Rodota
                  statement and Smith
                  statement.
                   
                  Finally, the subcommittee heard from a panel of U.S. and
                  Canadian witnesses. Jonathan Winer, an attorney with the law
                  firm of Alston & Byrd,
                  condemned the EU Privacy Directive in his testimony;
                  "The stakes are not just protecting privacy, but
                  simultaneously protecting sovereignty, protecting
                  Constitutional freedoms, especially the freedom of expression,
                  and preventing the risk of serious harm to the U.S. and to the
                  global economy." Former Ambassador David Aaron read a statement
                  in which he said that "there are a number of fundamental
                  problems with the European Directive. First, it was conceived
                  over a dozen years ago when there was no World Wide Web 
                  ..." In contrast, Joel Reidenberg, a law professor at
                  Fordham University, praised the Directive. See, statement.
                  Barbara Lawler of Hewlitt Packard explained her company's
                  participation in the Safe Harbor. Denis Henry of Bell Canada
                  also testified. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Computer Crime | 
               
              
                3/8. The FBI's NIPC
                  issued an advisory
                  and a release
                  regarding "a series of organized hacker activities
                  specifically targeting U.S. computer systems associated with
                  e-commerce or e-banking. Despite previous advisories, many
                  computer owners have not patched their systems, allowing these
                  kinds of attacks to continue ..." The advisory
                  states that "several organized hacker groups from Eastern
                  Europe, specifically Russia and the Ukraine ... have
                  penetrated U.S. e-commerce computer systems by exploiting
                  vulnerabilities in unpatched Microsoft Windows NT operating
                  systems." They download proprietary information, customer
                  databases, and credit card information, and then extort money
                  under the guise of providing security services. Microsoft also commented.
                  "One of the most troubling aspects of these attacks is
                  that virtually all of them were carried out via known
                  vulnerabilities for which patches have been available for
                  months or, in some cases, years," said Scott Culp,
                  Security Program Manager of the Microsoft Security Response
                  Center, in a Security Bulletin. See also, Microsoft companion
                  article.
                   
                  3/6. Mark Dipadova and Theresa Ford plead guilty in U.S.
                  District Court (DSC)
                  to conspiracy to traffic in counterfeit watches and
                  other goods, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. They
                  conducted their criminal operation through a website formerly
                  located at www.fakegifts.com. This case is being prosecuted by
                  AUSA
                  Dean Eichelberger. See, DOJ
                  release.
                   
                  3/8. A grand jury of the U.S. District Court (EDCal)
                  returned an indictment against three individuals for wire
                  fraud and mail fraud for operating a fraudulent bidding
                  ring on the eBay auction web site. The indictment alleges
                  that the defendants created more than 40 User IDs on eBay
                  using false registration information, and then used those
                  aliases to place fraudulent bids to artificially inflate the
                  prices of hundreds of paintings they auctioned on eBay. The
                  case is being prosecuted by AUSAs
                  Christopher Sonderby and Michael Malecek. See, DOJ
                  release.
                   
                  3/7. Jesus Oquendo was convicted in U.S. District Court (SDNY)
                  of illegal computer intrusion and electronic eavesdropping.
                  He is a former computer security specialist whose hacking
                  began with access to the offices of his first victim. See, DOJ
                  release. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | More News | 
               
              
                3/8. The House
                  Commerce Committee's Subcommittee on Telecommunications
                  and the Internet held an information gathering hearing titled Technology
                  and Education: A Review of Federal, State, and Private Sector
                  Programs. See, witness statements: Kate
                  Moore (USAC), David
                  Spencer (Michigan Virtual Univ.), Dan
                  Domenech (Fairfax County Pub. Sch.), Dale
                  McDonald (Nat. Cath. Educ. Assoc.), Judith
                  McHale (Discovery Comms.), Hal
                  Krisbergh (WorldGate Comms.), Rae
                  Grad (PowerUP), Jennifer
                  House (Classroom Connect), Emlyn
                  Koster (Liberty Science Center). 
                   
                  3/8. EU Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy gave a speech
                  in Washington DC on EU US trade disputes. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Copyright Law & Online Education | 
               
              
                3/7. Sen. Orrin Hatch
                  (R-UT) and Sen. Patrick
                  Leahy (D-VT) introduced S 487, the Technology
                  Education and Copyright Harmonization Act -- TEACH Act. This
                  bill would amend § 110(2)
                  of the Copyright Act to expand the educational use
                  exemption in the copyright law to include online distance
                  learning.
                   
                  3/7. Sen. Hatch stated in the Senate that "copyright law
                  contains a number of exemptions to copyright owners' rights
                  relating to face-to-face classroom teaching and instructional
                  broadcasts. While these exemptions embody the policy that
                  certain uses of copyrighted works for instructional purposes
                  should be exempt from copyright control, the current
                  exemptions were not drafted with online, interactive digital
                  technologies in mind. As a result, the Copyright Office
                  concluded that the current exemptions related to instructional
                  purposes are probably inapplicable to most advanced digital
                  delivery systems ..." He added that "the primary
                  goal of this legislation is ... to promote digital distance
                  learning by permitting certain limited instructional
                  activities to take place without running afoul of the rights
                  of copyright owners."
                   
                  3/7. Sen. Leahy stated in the Senate that S 487
                  "makes three significant expansions in the distance
                  learning exemption in our copyright law ... First, the bill
                  eliminates the current eligibility requirements for the
                  distance learning exemption that the instruction occur in a
                  physical classroom or that special circumstances prevent the
                  attendance of students in the classroom. Second, the bill
                  clarifies that the distance learning exemption covers the
                  temporary copies necessarily made in networked servers in the
                  course of transmitting material over the Internet. Third, the
                  current distance learning exemption only permits the
                  transmission of the performance of 'non-dramatic literary or
                  musical works,' but does not allow the transmission of movies
                  or videotapes, or the performance of plays." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Tech Education Bills | 
               
              
                3/7. Rep. Mark
                  Udall (D-CO) introduced HR 932, the Science Teacher
                  Scholarships for Scientists and Engineers Act, a bill to
                  provide scholarships for scientists and engineers to become
                  certified as science, mathematics, and technology teachers in
                  elementary and secondary schools. It was referred to the House Science Committee.
                  See, release.
                   
                  3/7. Sen. Mike Crapo
                  (R-ID) introduced S 473, a bill to amend the Elementary
                  and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to improve training for
                  teachers in the use of technology. It was referred to the
                  Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
                   
                  3/7. Sen. Pat Roberts
                  (R-KS) introduced S 478, a bill to establish and expand
                  programs relating to engineering, science, technology and
                  mathematics education. It was referred to the Committee on
                  Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. He stated that
                  "the American educational system is not producing enough
                  students with specialized skills in engineering, science,
                  technology, and math ... As a result of this shortage of
                  skilled workers, Congress had to increase the number of H-1B
                  visas by almost 300,000 from fiscal year 2000 to fiscal year
                  2002." He also stated that this is a national security
                  issue. "We don't have the people to do the job to protect
                  our country in regard to cyber threats ..." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Today | 
               
              
                10:00 AM. The USTR will
                  conduct a hearing regarding software and music piracy in
                  Russia and Brazil. It will conduct a hearing on the two
                  countries' eligibility for duty free status under the
                  Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). Pursuant to The Trade
                  Act of 1974, the GSP program grants duty-free
                  treatment to designated eligible articles that are imported
                  from designated beneficiary developing countries, including
                  the Russian Federation and Brazil. The IIPA
                  filed petitions on Aug. 21, 2000, requesting that the duty
                  free status of these countries be withdrawn. See, petition
                  re Russia [PDF] and petition
                  re Brazil [PDF]. On Jan. 10, 2001, the USTR published a Notice
                  in the Federal Register regarding this hearing. See, Vol. 66,
                  No. 7, at Pages 2034 - 2035. Location: Office of the U.S.
                  Trade Representative, 1724 F Street, NW, Washington DC.
                   
                  12:00 NOON. FTC Commissioner Thomas Leary will deliver the
                  keynote address at the 37th Annual Symposium on Associations
                  and Antitrust, sponsored by the Antitrust and Association Law
                  Committee of the Bar Association of the District of Columbia.
                  Location: Hilton Washington & Towers, 1919 Connecticut
                  Avenue, NW, Washington DC.
                   
                  Deadline to file reply comments with the FCC in response
                  to its notice
                  of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) regarding reallocation of
                  spectrum for use by Third Generation (3G) wireless services.
                  3G is intended to provide broadband Internet access to
                  portable devices. See, Federal Register, Jan. 23, 2001, Vol.
                  66, No. 15, Pages 7438 - 7443. ET Docket No. 00-258.
                   
                  10:00 AM. The NTIA
                  will release a report titled Assessment of Compatibility
                  between Ultrawideband (UWB) Systems and Global Positioning
                  Systems (GPS) Receivers. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal is a free access web site
                  and e-mail alert that provides news, records, and analysis of
                  legislation, litigation, and regulation affecting the computer
                  and Internet industry. This e-mail service is offered free of
                  charge to anyone who requests it. Just provide TLJ an e-mail
                  address. 
                   
                  Number of subscribers: 984. 
                   
                  Contact: 202-364-8882; E-mail. 
                  P.O. Box 15186, Washington DC, 20003. 
                   
                  Privacy
                  Policy 
                   
                  Notices
                  & Disclaimers 
                   
                  Copyright 1998 - 2001 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     |