| Senate Confirms USTR | 
               
              
                | 2/6. The U.S. Senate confirmed Robert Zoellick to be USTR by a vote
                  of 98-0. He was widely praised. The debate was not over
                  whether to confirm, but rather, how he should proceed on
                  several issues. Senate
                  Finance Committee Chairman Charles Grassley (R-IA)
                  stated that "The President, any President, needs trade
                  negotiating authority from Congress because his negotiating
                  credibility is diminished without it." However, he added,
                  "I don't have any illusions that this will be easy to
                  accomplish." The main source of contention is that many
                  Democrats want fast track trade negotiating authority
                  to include non trade related social issues. For example, Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT)
                  the ranking Democrat on the Finance Committee, stated again
                  that he will oppose any proposal to give the President fast
                  track trade negotiating authority that does not also extend to
                  labor and environmental issues. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Inmate E-Mail | 
               
              
                | 2/6. The California
                  Court of Appeal (1st Appellate Dist., Div. 1) issued its opinion
                  [PDF] in In
                  Re Aaron Collins, a case regarding access to
                  e-mail messages by prison inmates. The Court of Appeal
                  reversed a trial court order granting a petition for habeas
                  corpus filed in connection with a prison policy that denied
                  access to materials sent by e-mail. Aaron Collins, a prisoner
                  in California's maximum security Pelican Bay State Prison, was
                  a subscriber to a service for prison inmates that prints any
                  e-mail messages received by the inmate subscriber and sends
                  them to the inmate by regular U.S. mail. The prison warden
                  adopted a policy that the prison mailroom would not accept
                  such mail. Collins filed a petition for habeas corpus. The
                  trial court granted the petition on First Amendment grounds,
                  and ruled that inmates could receive printed copies of e-mail.
                  The Court of Appeal reversed, stating that the prison had
                  legitimate security concerns, particularly, preventing inmates
                  from participating in criminal activity via mail. The court
                  concluded that the potential high volume of e-mail, the
                  relative anonymity of the senders, and the ability of senders
                  to easily send or attach lengthy articles and other
                  publications would greatly increase the risk that prohibited
                  criminal communications would enter the prison undetected and
                  would make tracing their source more difficult. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Commerce Dept. | 
               
              
                2/6. William Daley was elected to the EDS Board of Directors. Most
                  recently, he was chairman of Gore Lieberman presidential
                  campaign. Before that he headed the Department of Commerce. He is
                  also a former partner in the law firm of Mayer, Brown & Platt.
                  See, EDS
                  release.
                   
                  2/5. Don Evans was sworn in as the new Secretary of
                  Commerce. President Bush stated at the event that "Don
                  shares with me a conviction that open trade is a powerful
                  force for good in the world.  In all our dealings
                  abroad, we must stand for free markets and for the principles
                  of democracy." Sec. Evans stated that "Bush has a
                  vision for America. It is a vision where our e-commerce
                  entrepreneurs are free from excessive regulation, so that they
                  can dream and build. We look forward to leading the
                  administration's e-commerce efforts, by our activities at NTIA,
                  at NIST,
                  at PTO,
                  EDA, MBDA." Evans concluded that "Our e-commerce
                  leaders can make plans secure in the knowledge that we will
                  provide guidelines with certainty. Our economic team can
                  implement your economic policy with data that is reliable and
                  certain. Our trading partners can know we will enforce
                  our trade agreements with certainty." See, transcript. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | New Documents | 
               
              
                USCA:
                  scheduling
                  order in Microsoft antitrust case, 2/6 (PDF, USCA).
                   
                  USCA:
                  opinion
                  in ALS Scan v. RemarQ re DMCA, 2/6 (HTML, USCA).
                   
                  CCA:
                  opinion
                  in In Re Aaron Collins re access to e-mail messages by prison
                  inmates, 2/6 (PDF, CCA).
                   
                  USCA:
                  opinion
                  in Bachow v. FCC re 39 GHz band, 2/6 (HTML, USCA). | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Microsoft Appeal | 
               
              
                | 2/6. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (DCCir) issued a scheduling order
                  [PDF] in the Microsoft antitrust case which sets the
                  amount of time allotted for each appeal argument. The Court's
                  time assignments differ significantly from those recommended
                  by the parties in their joint
                  filing of Feb. 2, and perhaps reflects the thinking of
                  some members of the Court regarding the relative importance of
                  the different issues. The parties had agreed to have the court
                  consider the issue of Judge Jackson's out of court statements
                  on written submissions. However, the Court's order provides
                  for one hour of oral argument on this issue. The Court also
                  assigned the most amount of time (150 minutes) to the monopoly
                  maintenance issue; the parties had recommended 90 minutes. The
                  Court also raised the amount of time for the remedies issue
                  from 60 to 90 minutes. The Court also assigned 90 for the
                  tying issue, as the parties had urged. The Court also hinted
                  that it may actually take much more time for arguments and
                  questions. Its order further states that "The court
                  reserves the possibility that the time allotted will be
                  extended if it is determined to be insufficient to address the
                  questions at issue. The parties, therefore, should be
                  available between 9:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. on both February 26
                  and 27, 2001. If argument extends into the afternoon on either
                  day, the court will take a ninety (90) minute recess for
                  lunch." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Business Method Patents | 
               
              
                | 2/6. The Intellectual Property
                  Owners Association (IPO) is holding its midwinter meeting
                  in Florida. Its Board of Directors announced that it has
                  reaffirmed the statement on
                  business method patents that it first adopted on June
                  28, 2000. This document states that, "IPO does not
                  believe that Congress should legislate in the area of business
                  method patents at the present time. Additionally, IPO is not
                  aware of any legislative proposals today that merit serious
                  consideration or debate." Since this statement was first
                  adopted, Rep. Howard
                  Berman (D-CA) and Rep.
                  Rick Boucher (D-VA) introduced the Business
                  Method Patent Improvement Act. The bill was introduced
                  late in the 106th Congress, but the two stated that they would
                  refile in the current Congress. The IPO Board also adopted a
                  position that intellectual property should not be a subject
                  for the next round of global trade negotiations. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | DMCA | 
               
              
                | 2/6. The U.S.
                  District Court (4thCir) issued its opinion
                  in ALS
                  Scan v. RemarQ, a case regarding copyright
                  infringement under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).
                  Title II of the DMCA provides a ISPs a limited immunity from
                  liability for copyright infringement for certain acts,
                  including storage of information on its systems or networks at
                  the direction of users. However, the DMCA also requires that
                  ISPs take down or block infringing material upon notice from a
                  copyright holder that complies with DMCA. This case addresses
                  the effect of a defective notice. The Appeals Court ruled that
                  an ISP cannot rely on a defense of defective notice to
                  maintain the immunity defense provided by the DMCA safe harbor
                  provision where there was substantial compliance. Here are the
                  facts. ALS is a pornographer; it holds copyrights in porn
                  pictures. RemarQ is an ISP that provided its subscribers two
                  porn newsgroups. RemarQ's subscribers posted porn pictures
                  copyrighted by ALS in these newsgroups. ALS mailed to RemarQ a
                  demand that it "cease carrying these newsgroups".
                  RemarQ responded that it would take down infringing pictures
                  if ALS identified them "with sufficient
                  specificity", as required by the DMCA. ALS did not
                  provide specificity. Instead, it filed a complaint in the U.S.
                  District Court (DMd) alleging violations of the Copyright Act
                  (both direct and contributory infringement) and Title II of
                  the DMCA, as well as unfair competition. RemarQ moved to
                  dismiss on the grounds that ALS's failure to comply with the
                  DMCA notice requirements provided it with a defense to ALS's
                  copyright infringement claim. The District Court agreed, and
                  dismissed. This appeal followed. The Appeals Court reversed.
                  Defective notice under Title II of the DMCA that is in
                  substantial compliance is sufficient. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | More News | 
               
              
                2/6. The U.S.
                  Court of Appeals (DCCir) issued its opinion
                  in Bachow
                  Communications v. FCC, a case regarding the FCC's
                  conversion of its system for awarding licenses in the 39
                  GHz band from a comparative application process to a
                  public auction. The Court affirmed the FCC's orders.
                   
                  2/6. The U.S. District Court (DDC),
                  held a status hearing in EPIC
                  v. DOJ. This is a FOIA suit
                  regarding the production of documents pertaining to the FBI's
                  e-mail surveillance system named Carnivore. The parties
                  stated that only 3 pages remain to be processed by the
                  government.
                   
                  2/6. The Federal Communications
                  Bar Association hosted a seminar titled "Technology
                  and the FCC: What Every Advocate Should Know." Topics
                  included the AOL Time Warner merger reviews, secondary markets
                  for spectrum rights, ultrawideband technologies, and spectrum
                  sharing policies.
                   
                  2/6. NCTA
                  CEO Robert Sachs gave a speech in Washington DC in observance
                  of the fifth anniversary of the Telecom Act of 1996 in which
                  he stated that "Internet protocol (IP) telephony over
                  broadband cable networks is next on cable's priority
                  chart." See, release.
                   
                  2/6. The FTC's Bureau of Consumer
                  Protection held a workshop on alternative dispute resolution. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     | 
     | 
    
      
        
          
            
              
                | Powell Speaks | 
               
              
                | 2/6. The new FCC Chairman, Michael
                  Powell, held his first press conference as Chairman. He
                  revealed that he will lead the FCC much differently from his
                  predecessors, William Kennard and Reed Hundt. He stated that
                  he favors a less regulatory and less legislative agency; he
                  will be more cautious and more aware of the FCC's limitations.
                  Also, he stated that he will implement the laws passed by the
                  Congress, and refrain from policy making, or even speaking out
                  on many policy questions. He indicated that the FCC will
                  continue to conduct antitrust merger reviews, but he hopes to
                  speed up the process, and treat similar parties similarly. He
                  stated that the FCC will try to facilitate the development of
                  3G wireless technologies, but added that it will not be an
                  easy process. He praised the Telecom Act for unleashing
                  broadband Internet access; he elaborated that it allowed
                  AT&T to buy cable companies, and provide cable Internet
                  access, which in turn prompted the phones companies to provide
                  DSL service. He answered questions for about an hour with a
                  command of the issues, and a sense of direction. He also joked
                  about several topics. When asked about the "digital
                  divide", he added, "I think there is a Mercedes
                  divide. I would like one. I can't afford one." When asked
                  if he could give his definition of the "public
                  interest", he said, "I have no idea." | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Antitrust | 
               
              
                | 2/6. The Antitrust
                  Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced
                  that it has approved the merger of JDS Uniphase (JDSU) and
                  SDL, subject to JDS
                  Uniphase's agreement to sell its Zurich subsidiary to Nortel Networks.
                  JDSU is an optical fiber network component maker. It makes
                  semiconductor lasers, high speed external modulators, and
                  transmitters for fiber optic networks. Fiber optic networks
                  are enabling the rapid growth of Internet bandwidth. SDL makes
                  products that power the transmission of data over fiber optic
                  networks. Nortel is a communications company. According to the
                  DOJ, the issue was that the merger "as originally
                  proposed, would have led to the loss of head-to-head
                  competition in the production of 980 nm pump laser
                  chips." The DOJ stated that "Under the divestiture,
                  JDS Uniphase has agreed to sell its entire Uniphase Laser
                  Enterprise (ULE) division to Nortel Networks in a transaction
                  valued at about $3 billion. ULE is a major manufacturer of 980
                  nm pump laser chips." See, JDSU release,
                  Nortel release,
                  SDL release,
                  and DOJ release. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Tax Policy | 
               
              
                | 2/5. President Bush announced his intention to nominate Mark
                  Weinberger as Assistant Secretary of Treasury for Tax
                  Policy. The Office
                  of Tax Policy has in the past been involved in many high
                  tech issues, including depreciation schedules for computer
                  equipment, the research and development tax credit, capital
                  gains treatment of investments in venture capital
                  partnerships, taxation of Internet sales, and the foreign
                  sales corporation regime. However, President Bush's proposed
                  $1.6 Trillion across the board tax cut may be a higher
                  priority. Weinberger is presently the Director of National Tax
                  Practice at Ernst &
                  Young in Washington DC. See, release. | 
               
             
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | Today | 
               
              
                10:30 AM. The Senate
                  Banking Committee will hold a hearing on export
                  controls. The scheduled witnesses include Dan Hoydysh
                  (Computer Coalition for Responsible Exports), Paul Freedenberg
                  (Association for Manufacturing Technology), and Richard Cupitt
                  (Center for International Trade and Security). Location: Room
                  538, Dirksen Building.
                   
                  12:30 PM. AT&T Chairman
                  and CEO Michael Armstrong will speak at a National Press Club Luncheon.
                  Location: NPC Ballroom, 529 14th St. NW, 13th Floor,
                  Washington DC, 20045. | 
              
           | 
         
        
           | 
         
        
          
            
              
                | About Tech Law Journal | 
               
                Tech Law Journal is a free access web site
                  and e-mail alert that provides news, records, and analysis of
                  legislation, litigation, and regulation affecting the computer
                  and Internet industry. 
                   
                  This e-mail service is offered free of charge to anyone who
                  requests it. Just provide TLJ an e-mail address. 
                   
                  Number of subscribers (as of Feb. 6): 760. 
                   
                  Contact TLJ: 
                  202-364-8882. 
                  E-mail. 
                  P.O. Box 15186, Washington DC, 20003. 
                   
                  Privacy
                  Policy 
                   
                  Notices
                  & Disclaimers 
                   
                  Copyright 1998 - 2001 David Carney, dba Tech Law Journal. All
                  rights reserved. | 
               
             
           | 
         
       
     |